From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pugs@cisco.com,
chrisw@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] APIC/IOAPIC EOI callback
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:59:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278885555.20397.181.camel@x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100711201246.GA12544@redhat.com>
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 23:12 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:03:34PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > What about threaded interrupts?
>
> Just to make the point, imagine a nested virt situation
> which uses current kvm device assignment in guest.
> Look at the interrupt handler we have there.
Is the problem you're worried about this:
guest masks qemu ioapic rte
device interrupt
host vfio DisINTx+
qemu vfio calls qemu_set_irq
...
In that case, the qemu ioapic irr bit is only toggled by qemu_set_irq
for level triggered interrupts, so the interrupt will be asserted in the
guest when it gets unmasked and we'll get the eoi.
I can't figure out where your other scenario can leave the DisINTx+:
device asserts interrupt
a) DisINTx+ via host vfio
guest disables interrupt
b) DisINTx+ via guest, already set
eoi
c) DisINTx- via qemu vfio
driver clears interrupt
guest enables interrupt
d) DisINTx- via guest
device asserts interrupt
So between c) & d) we're potentially getting more interrupts than we
want, but I can't see anywhere that we drop DisINTx. If you have a
scenario, let me know. Thanks,
Alex
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: chrisw@redhat.com, pugs@cisco.com, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] APIC/IOAPIC EOI callback
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:59:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278885555.20397.181.camel@x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100711201246.GA12544@redhat.com>
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 23:12 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:03:34PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > What about threaded interrupts?
>
> Just to make the point, imagine a nested virt situation
> which uses current kvm device assignment in guest.
> Look at the interrupt handler we have there.
Is the problem you're worried about this:
guest masks qemu ioapic rte
device interrupt
host vfio DisINTx+
qemu vfio calls qemu_set_irq
...
In that case, the qemu ioapic irr bit is only toggled by qemu_set_irq
for level triggered interrupts, so the interrupt will be asserted in the
guest when it gets unmasked and we'll get the eoi.
I can't figure out where your other scenario can leave the DisINTx+:
device asserts interrupt
a) DisINTx+ via host vfio
guest disables interrupt
b) DisINTx+ via guest, already set
eoi
c) DisINTx- via qemu vfio
driver clears interrupt
guest enables interrupt
d) DisINTx- via guest
device asserts interrupt
So between c) & d) we're potentially getting more interrupts than we
want, but I can't see anywhere that we drop DisINTx. If you have a
scenario, let me know. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-11 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-11 18:09 [RFC PATCH 0/5] QEMU VFIO device assignment Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] qemu_ram_map/unmap: Allow pre-allocated space to be mapped Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] Minimal RAM API support Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:18 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:20 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:24 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:29 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] RAM API: Make use of it for x86 PC Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] APIC/IOAPIC EOI callback Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:14 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:14 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:26 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:30 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-11 18:54 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-11 19:21 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 19:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 19:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-11 19:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-11 20:03 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 20:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 20:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-11 20:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-11 20:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-11 20:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-11 21:59 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2010-07-11 21:59 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-12 6:33 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 6:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 9:05 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-07-12 9:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gleb Natapov
2010-07-12 9:13 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 9:13 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] VFIO based device assignment Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:27 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 19:38 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 19:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-12 6:37 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 6:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:17 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] QEMU VFIO " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:37 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 18:43 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 18:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 20:24 ` Alex Williamson
2010-07-11 20:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2010-07-12 6:29 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 6:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-07-12 11:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-07-12 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278885555.20397.181.camel@x201 \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pugs@cisco.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.