From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@nokia.com>
To: ext Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] netfilter: xt_condition: export list management code
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:31:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279567881.11662.104.camel@powerslave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279566876.11662.102.camel@powerslave>
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 21:14 +0200, Coelho Luciano (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)
wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 18:13 +0200, ext Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Monday 2010-07-19 16:15, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > >@@ -3,12 +3,27 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > >
> > >+#define XT_CONDITION_MAX_NAME_SIZE 30
> > >+
> > > struct xt_condition_mtinfo {
> > >- char name[31];
> > >+ char name[XT_CONDITION_MAX_NAME_SIZE + 1];
> > > __u8 invert;
> >
> > Oh noes. Please please avoid any math operations inside []. It has
> > already driven XT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN into nuts ("was it now +1 or -1,
> > or even -2 that we needed to pass for various functions?"). Just let MAX
> > be 31 and have name[MAX].
>
> Yeah, I had already done as you suggested in my previous module
> (IDLETIMER), I don't know what I had in my head today when I did it
> differently. Even the name of the macro is totally wrong (_SIZE), it
> would make a tiny little bit more sense if it was _LEN. I'll change it.
I was not very clear here, I meant I'll change to what you proposed, ie.
keep it _SIZE and use 31, of course.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-19 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-19 14:15 [RFC 0/2] netfilter: xtables: CONDITION target implementation Luciano Coelho
2010-07-19 14:15 ` [RFC 1/2] netfilter: xt_condition: export list management code Luciano Coelho
2010-07-19 16:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-07-19 19:14 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-07-19 19:31 ` Luciano Coelho [this message]
2010-07-19 14:15 ` [RFC 2/2] netfilter: xtables: implement CONDITION target Luciano Coelho
2010-07-19 14:27 ` [RFC 0/2] netfilter: xtables: CONDITION target implementation Changli Gao
2010-07-19 14:31 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279567881.11662.104.camel@powerslave \
--to=luciano.coelho@nokia.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.