All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/31] memblock: Factor the lowest level alloc function
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:20:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279822864-17154-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279822864-17154-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
 mm/memblock.c |   59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 83643f3..9b71de0 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static u64 memblock_align_up(u64 addr, u64 size)
 	return (addr + (size - 1)) & ~(size - 1);
 }
 
-static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
-					   u64 size, u64 align)
+static u64 __init memblock_alloc_region(u64 start, u64 end,
+				   u64 size, u64 align)
 {
 	u64 base, res_base;
 	long j;
@@ -318,6 +318,13 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
 	return ~(u64)0;
 }
 
+u64 __weak __init memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
+{
+	*nid = 0;
+
+	return end;
+}
+
 static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
 				       u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
 {
@@ -333,8 +340,7 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
 
 		this_end = memblock_nid_range(start, end, &this_nid);
 		if (this_nid == nid) {
-			u64 ret = memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(start, this_end,
-							   size, align);
+			u64 ret = memblock_alloc_region(start, this_end, size, align);
 			if (ret != ~(u64)0)
 				return ret;
 		}
@@ -351,6 +357,10 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid(u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
 
 	BUG_ON(0 == size);
 
+	/* We do a bottom-up search for a region with the right
+	 * nid since that's easier considering how memblock_nid_range()
+	 * works
+	 */
 	size = memblock_align_up(size, align);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < mem->cnt; i++) {
@@ -383,7 +393,7 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 
 u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 {
-	long i, j;
+	long i;
 	u64 base = 0;
 	u64 res_base;
 
@@ -396,33 +406,24 @@ u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 	if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
 		max_addr = MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT;
 
+	/* Pump up max_addr */
+	if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
+		max_addr = ~(u64)0;
+
+	/* We do a top-down search, this tends to limit memory
+	 * fragmentation by keeping early boot allocs near the
+	 * top of memory
+	 */
 	for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
 		u64 memblockbase = memblock.memory.regions[i].base;
 		u64 memblocksize = memblock.memory.regions[i].size;
 
 		if (memblocksize < size)
 			continue;
-		if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
-			base = memblock_align_down(memblockbase + memblocksize - size, align);
-		else if (memblockbase < max_addr) {
-			base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
-			base = memblock_align_down(base - size, align);
-		} else
-			continue;
-
-		while (base && memblockbase <= base) {
-			j = memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
-			if (j < 0) {
-				/* this area isn't reserved, take it */
-				if (memblock_add_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size) < 0)
-					return 0;
-				return base;
-			}
-			res_base = memblock.reserved.regions[j].base;
-			if (res_base < size)
-				break;
-			base = memblock_align_down(res_base - size, align);
-		}
+		base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
+		res_base = memblock_alloc_region(memblockbase, base, size, align);
+		if (res_base != ~(u64)0)
+			return res_base;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -502,9 +503,3 @@ int memblock_is_region_reserved(u64 base, u64 size)
 	return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
 }
 
-u64 __weak memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
-{
-	*nid = 0;
-
-	return end;
-}
-- 
1.6.4.2

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/31] memblock: Factor the lowest level alloc function
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:20:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279822864-17154-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20100722182038.GQNpfX4qGGm5zHOMuAi8pAnqWuu8K257qPT2-jQDI00@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279822864-17154-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
 mm/memblock.c |   59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 83643f3..9b71de0 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static u64 memblock_align_up(u64 addr, u64 size)
 	return (addr + (size - 1)) & ~(size - 1);
 }
 
-static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
-					   u64 size, u64 align)
+static u64 __init memblock_alloc_region(u64 start, u64 end,
+				   u64 size, u64 align)
 {
 	u64 base, res_base;
 	long j;
@@ -318,6 +318,13 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
 	return ~(u64)0;
 }
 
+u64 __weak __init memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
+{
+	*nid = 0;
+
+	return end;
+}
+
 static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
 				       u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
 {
@@ -333,8 +340,7 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
 
 		this_end = memblock_nid_range(start, end, &this_nid);
 		if (this_nid == nid) {
-			u64 ret = memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(start, this_end,
-							   size, align);
+			u64 ret = memblock_alloc_region(start, this_end, size, align);
 			if (ret != ~(u64)0)
 				return ret;
 		}
@@ -351,6 +357,10 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid(u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
 
 	BUG_ON(0 == size);
 
+	/* We do a bottom-up search for a region with the right
+	 * nid since that's easier considering how memblock_nid_range()
+	 * works
+	 */
 	size = memblock_align_up(size, align);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < mem->cnt; i++) {
@@ -383,7 +393,7 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 
 u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 {
-	long i, j;
+	long i;
 	u64 base = 0;
 	u64 res_base;
 
@@ -396,33 +406,24 @@ u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 	if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
 		max_addr = MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT;
 
+	/* Pump up max_addr */
+	if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
+		max_addr = ~(u64)0;
+
+	/* We do a top-down search, this tends to limit memory
+	 * fragmentation by keeping early boot allocs near the
+	 * top of memory
+	 */
 	for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
 		u64 memblockbase = memblock.memory.regions[i].base;
 		u64 memblocksize = memblock.memory.regions[i].size;
 
 		if (memblocksize < size)
 			continue;
-		if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
-			base = memblock_align_down(memblockbase + memblocksize - size, align);
-		else if (memblockbase < max_addr) {
-			base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
-			base = memblock_align_down(base - size, align);
-		} else
-			continue;
-
-		while (base && memblockbase <= base) {
-			j = memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
-			if (j < 0) {
-				/* this area isn't reserved, take it */
-				if (memblock_add_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size) < 0)
-					return 0;
-				return base;
-			}
-			res_base = memblock.reserved.regions[j].base;
-			if (res_base < size)
-				break;
-			base = memblock_align_down(res_base - size, align);
-		}
+		base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
+		res_base = memblock_alloc_region(memblockbase, base, size, align);
+		if (res_base != ~(u64)0)
+			return res_base;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -502,9 +503,3 @@ int memblock_is_region_reserved(u64 base, u64 size)
 	return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
 }
 
-u64 __weak memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
-{
-	*nid = 0;
-
-	return end;
-}
-- 
1.6.4.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/31] memblock: Factor the lowest level alloc function
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:20:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279822864-17154-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1279822864-17154-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
 mm/memblock.c |   59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 83643f3..9b71de0 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static u64 memblock_align_up(u64 addr, u64 size)
 	return (addr + (size - 1)) & ~(size - 1);
 }
 
-static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
-					   u64 size, u64 align)
+static u64 __init memblock_alloc_region(u64 start, u64 end,
+				   u64 size, u64 align)
 {
 	u64 base, res_base;
 	long j;
@@ -318,6 +318,13 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end,
 	return ~(u64)0;
 }
 
+u64 __weak __init memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
+{
+	*nid = 0;
+
+	return end;
+}
+
 static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
 				       u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
 {
@@ -333,8 +340,7 @@ static u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
 
 		this_end = memblock_nid_range(start, end, &this_nid);
 		if (this_nid == nid) {
-			u64 ret = memblock_alloc_nid_unreserved(start, this_end,
-							   size, align);
+			u64 ret = memblock_alloc_region(start, this_end, size, align);
 			if (ret != ~(u64)0)
 				return ret;
 		}
@@ -351,6 +357,10 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_nid(u64 size, u64 align, int nid)
 
 	BUG_ON(0 == size);
 
+	/* We do a bottom-up search for a region with the right
+	 * nid since that's easier considering how memblock_nid_range()
+	 * works
+	 */
 	size = memblock_align_up(size, align);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < mem->cnt; i++) {
@@ -383,7 +393,7 @@ u64 __init memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 
 u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 {
-	long i, j;
+	long i;
 	u64 base = 0;
 	u64 res_base;
 
@@ -396,33 +406,24 @@ u64 __init __memblock_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr)
 	if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
 		max_addr = MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT;
 
+	/* Pump up max_addr */
+	if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
+		max_addr = ~(u64)0;
+
+	/* We do a top-down search, this tends to limit memory
+	 * fragmentation by keeping early boot allocs near the
+	 * top of memory
+	 */
 	for (i = memblock.memory.cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
 		u64 memblockbase = memblock.memory.regions[i].base;
 		u64 memblocksize = memblock.memory.regions[i].size;
 
 		if (memblocksize < size)
 			continue;
-		if (max_addr == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE)
-			base = memblock_align_down(memblockbase + memblocksize - size, align);
-		else if (memblockbase < max_addr) {
-			base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
-			base = memblock_align_down(base - size, align);
-		} else
-			continue;
-
-		while (base && memblockbase <= base) {
-			j = memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
-			if (j < 0) {
-				/* this area isn't reserved, take it */
-				if (memblock_add_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size) < 0)
-					return 0;
-				return base;
-			}
-			res_base = memblock.reserved.regions[j].base;
-			if (res_base < size)
-				break;
-			base = memblock_align_down(res_base - size, align);
-		}
+		base = min(memblockbase + memblocksize, max_addr);
+		res_base = memblock_alloc_region(memblockbase, base, size, align);
+		if (res_base != ~(u64)0)
+			return res_base;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -502,9 +503,3 @@ int memblock_is_region_reserved(u64 base, u64 size)
 	return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
 }
 
-u64 __weak memblock_nid_range(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)
-{
-	*nid = 0;
-
-	return end;
-}
-- 
1.6.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-07-22 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-22 18:20 [PATCH -v26 00/31] generic changes for memblock Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 01/31] memblock: Rename memblock_region to memblock_type and memblock_property to memblock_region Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 02/31] memblock: No reason to include asm/memblock.h late Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 03/31] memblock: Introduce for_each_memblock() and new accessors, and use it Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 04/31] memblock: Remove nid_range argument, arch provides memblock_nid_range() instead Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-07-22 18:20   ` [PATCH 05/31] memblock: Factor the lowest level alloc function Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 06/31] memblock: Expose MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 07/31] memblock: Introduce default allocation limit and use it to replace explicit ones Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 08/31] memblock: Remove rmo_size, burry it in arch/powerpc where it belongs Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 09/31] memblock: Change u64 to phys_addr_t Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 10/31] memblock: Remove unused memblock.debug struct member Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 11/31] memblock: Remove memblock_type.size and add memblock.memory_size instead Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 12/31] memblock: Move memblock arrays to static storage in memblock.c and make their size a variable Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 13/31] memblock: Add debug markers at the end of the array Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 14/31] memblock: Make memblock_find_region() out of memblock_alloc_region() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 15/31] memblock: Define MEMBLOCK_ERROR internally instead of using ~(phys_addr_t)0 Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 16/31] memblock: Move memblock_init() to the bottom of the file Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 17/31] memblock: split memblock_find_base() out of __memblock_alloc_base() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 18/31] memblock: Move functions around into a more sensible order Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 19/31] memblock: Add array resizing support Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 20/31] memblock: Add arch function to control coalescing of memblock memory regions Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 21/31] memblock: Add "start" argument to memblock_find_base() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 22/31] memblock: NUMA allocate can now use early_pfn_map Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 23/31] memblock: Separate memblock_alloc_nid() and memblock_alloc_try_nid() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 24/31] memblock: Make memblock_alloc_try_nid() fallback to MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 25/31] memblock: Add debugfs files to dump the arrays content Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20 ` [PATCH 26/31] memblock: Prepare x86 to use memblock to replace early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 27/31] memblock: Print new doubled array location info Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 28/31] memblock: Export MEMBLOCK_ERROR again Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28  5:15   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28  5:19     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28  5:53       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28  6:01         ` David Miller
2010-07-28  6:13           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28  9:29             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28  9:25           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28  6:29         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28  5:24     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 29/31] memblock: Prepare to include linux/memblock.h in core file Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28  5:27   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 30/31] memblock: Add ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK to put memblock code to .init Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28  5:45   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-22 18:21 ` [PATCH 31/31] memblock: Add memblock_find_in_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-22 18:21   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28  5:36   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28  6:08     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28  6:38       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28  7:12         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 16:06           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 17:02         ` James Bottomley
2010-07-28 17:53           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 18:10             ` James Bottomley
2010-07-28 18:30               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 19:27                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-28 19:58                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28 22:58                 ` Ralph Campbell
2010-07-28 23:41                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-28  9:27       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-28  6:22     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-22 21:35 ` [PATCH -v26 00/31] generic changes for memblock Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-07-22 22:00   ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1279822864-17154-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
    --to=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.