From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Be
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/17] x86,memblock: Add memblock_x86_reserve_range/memblock_x86_free_range
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:45:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280432737-1808-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280432737-1808-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
they are wrappers for core versions.
they are taking start/end/name instead of base/size.
will make x86 conversion more easy
could add more debug print out
-v2: change get_max_mapped() to memblock.default_alloc_limit according to Michael
Ellerman and Ben
change to memblock_x86_reserve_range and memblock_x86_free_range according to Michael Ellerman
-v3: call check_and_double after reserve/free, so could avoid to use
find_memblock_area. Suggested by Michael Ellerman
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h | 3 +++
arch/x86/mm/memblock.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 69cf853..e11ddf0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -6,4 +6,7 @@
u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
void memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end);
+void memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name);
+void memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end);
+
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index 8101084..9829eaf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -114,3 +114,25 @@ void __init memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end)
memblock_reserve_reserved_regions();
}
#endif
+
+void __init memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name)
+{
+ if (start == end)
+ return;
+
+ if (WARN_ONCE(start > end, "memblock_x86_reserve_range: wrong range [%#llx, %#llx]\n", start, end))
+ return;
+
+ memblock_reserve(start, end - start);
+}
+
+void __init memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end)
+{
+ if (start == end)
+ return;
+
+ if (WARN_ONCE(start > end, "memblock_x86_free_range: wrong range [%#llx, %#llx]\n", start, end))
+ return;
+
+ memblock_free(start, end - start);
+}
--
1.6.4.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/17] x86,memblock: Add memblock_x86_reserve_range/memblock_x86_free_range
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:45:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1280432737-1808-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20100729194525.MlfUUJwL6kNpAzE2YLxnFuZH0CssoU5JL6mAAXHdp2s@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280432737-1808-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
they are wrappers for core versions.
they are taking start/end/name instead of base/size.
will make x86 conversion more easy
could add more debug print out
-v2: change get_max_mapped() to memblock.default_alloc_limit according to Michael
Ellerman and Ben
change to memblock_x86_reserve_range and memblock_x86_free_range according to Michael Ellerman
-v3: call check_and_double after reserve/free, so could avoid to use
find_memblock_area. Suggested by Michael Ellerman
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h | 3 +++
arch/x86/mm/memblock.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 69cf853..e11ddf0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -6,4 +6,7 @@
u64 memblock_x86_find_in_range_size(u64 start, u64 *sizep, u64 align);
void memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end);
+void memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name);
+void memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end);
+
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index 8101084..9829eaf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -114,3 +114,25 @@ void __init memblock_x86_to_bootmem(u64 start, u64 end)
memblock_reserve_reserved_regions();
}
#endif
+
+void __init memblock_x86_reserve_range(u64 start, u64 end, char *name)
+{
+ if (start == end)
+ return;
+
+ if (WARN_ONCE(start > end, "memblock_x86_reserve_range: wrong range [%#llx, %#llx]\n", start, end))
+ return;
+
+ memblock_reserve(start, end - start);
+}
+
+void __init memblock_x86_free_range(u64 start, u64 end)
+{
+ if (start == end)
+ return;
+
+ if (WARN_ONCE(start > end, "memblock_x86_free_range: wrong range [%#llx, %#llx]\n", start, end))
+ return;
+
+ memblock_free(start, end - start);
+}
--
1.6.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-29 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-29 19:45 [PATCH -v27 00/17] Use memblock with x86 Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 01/17] memblock: Add memblock_free/reserve_reserved_regions() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 02/17] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 03/17] bootmem, x86: Add weak version of reserve_bootmem_generic Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 04/17] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_to_bootmem() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 05/17] x86,memblock: Add memblock_x86_reserve_range/memblock_x86_free_range Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 06/17] x86, memblock: Add get_free_all_memory_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 07/17] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_register_active_regions() and memblock_x86_hole_size() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 08/17] memblock: Add find_memory_core_early() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 09/17] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_find_in_range_node() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 10/17] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 11/17] x86, memblock: Add memblock_x86_memory_in_range() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 12/17] x86, memblock: Use memblock_debug to control debug message print out Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 13/17] x86: Use memblock to replace early_res Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 14/17] x86: Replace e820_/_early string with memblock_ Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 15/17] x86: Remove not used early_res code Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 16/17] x86, memblock: Use memblock_memory_size()/memblock_free_memory_size() to get correct dma_reserve Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` [PATCH 17/17] x86: remove old bootmem code Yinghai Lu
2010-07-29 19:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-07-31 7:15 ` [PATCH 01/17 -v2] memblock: Add memblock_free/reserve_reserved_regions() Yinghai Lu
2010-07-31 7:15 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1280432737-1808-6-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.