From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
Cc: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:02:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281348164.12908.47.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100809090137.GP13165@mea-ext.zmailer.org>
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 12:01 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> It would probably be "against corporate policy" to use gmail for these
> emails...
If that's the case, then you really *do* need to get your boss to fix
it.
If the company provides a working email account, it makes a certain
amount of sense for them to ask you to use it.
But if all they provide is Microsoft Exchange, that's insane -- what
Exchange provides is *like* email, but it is *not* email. Once you start
trying to use it for real email, you find it's broken by design in a
large number of ways. It makes no sense for them to require that you use
Exchange for Internet email, because that's not what Exchange does.
If my corporate overloads told me I had to use my Exchange "messaging"
account for external email communication, they would get a quite clear
'no' in response. My response may also contain suggestions that they use
certain other objects for purposes for which they were not designed.
Seriously, just use an external email account and ignore the broken
corporate policy. 'Policy' is just a euphemism for not having to think
for yourself.
--
dwmw2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server.
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:26:54 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1281348164.12908.47.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100809090137.GP13165@mea-ext.zmailer.org>
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 12:01 +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> It would probably be "against corporate policy" to use gmail for these
> emails...
If that's the case, then you really *do* need to get your boss to fix
it.
If the company provides a working email account, it makes a certain
amount of sense for them to ask you to use it.
But if all they provide is Microsoft Exchange, that's insane -- what
Exchange provides is *like* email, but it is *not* email. Once you start
trying to use it for real email, you find it's broken by design in a
large number of ways. It makes no sense for them to require that you use
Exchange for Internet email, because that's not what Exchange does.
If my corporate overloads told me I had to use my Exchange "messaging"
account for external email communication, they would get a quite clear
'no' in response. My response may also contain suggestions that they use
certain other objects for purposes for which they were not designed.
Seriously, just use an external email account and ignore the broken
corporate policy. 'Policy' is just a euphemism for not having to think
for yourself.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-09 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-09 6:07 Query: Patches break with Microsoft exchange server viresh kumar
2018-06-19 20:23 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-09 6:42 ` Justin P. Mattock
2018-06-19 20:24 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-09 6:55 ` viresh kumar
2018-06-19 20:24 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-09 7:32 ` Justin P. Mattock
2018-06-19 20:24 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-09 6:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2018-06-19 20:24 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-08-09 6:56 ` viresh kumar
2018-06-19 20:24 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-09 7:19 ` Valeo de Vries
2010-08-09 7:47 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-09 9:00 ` Valeo de Vries
2010-08-09 9:01 ` Matti Aarnio
2018-06-19 20:26 ` Matti Aarnio
2010-08-09 9:35 ` viresh kumar
2018-06-19 20:26 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-09 9:43 ` Justin P. Mattock
2018-06-19 20:26 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-09 14:35 ` Mihai Donțu
2010-08-09 14:35 ` Mihai Donțu
2010-08-09 17:55 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-09 17:55 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-09 18:15 ` Mihai Donțu
2010-08-09 18:15 ` Mihai Donțu
2010-08-09 18:53 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-09 18:53 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-09 21:28 ` David Woodhouse
2010-08-09 21:28 ` David Woodhouse
2010-08-09 21:56 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-09 21:56 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-09 22:12 ` Valeo de Vries
2010-08-09 22:24 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-11 14:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-08-11 14:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-08-10 9:22 ` Gadiyar, Anand
2010-08-10 9:22 ` Gadiyar, Anand
2010-08-10 9:26 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-10 9:26 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-09 10:02 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2018-06-19 20:26 ` David Woodhouse
2018-06-19 20:42 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-06-19 20:42 ` Willy Tarreau
2010-08-09 14:19 ` Richard Cochran
2010-08-09 14:19 ` Richard Cochran
2010-08-09 14:34 ` Valeo de Vries
2010-08-10 22:04 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-08-10 22:04 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-08-10 22:04 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-08-11 7:01 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-11 7:01 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-11 10:11 ` Valeo de Vries
2010-08-11 10:53 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-11 11:38 ` Wouter Simons
2010-08-11 13:33 ` Justin P. Mattock
2010-08-11 15:46 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2010-08-11 15:46 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2010-08-11 15:46 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2010-08-11 15:58 ` David Woodhouse
2010-08-11 15:58 ` David Woodhouse
2010-08-11 16:16 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2010-08-11 16:16 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2010-08-11 16:18 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-08-11 16:18 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-08-11 16:30 ` David Woodhouse
2010-08-11 16:30 ` David Woodhouse
2010-08-11 16:39 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-08-11 16:39 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-08-12 4:41 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-12 4:41 ` viresh kumar
2010-08-16 0:32 ` Gururaja Hebbar K R
2010-08-16 1:02 ` Gururaja Hebbar K R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1281348164.12908.47.camel@localhost \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.