All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] mm, highmem: kmap_atomic rework
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:38:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282315092.2605.1134.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100819143129.81274c03.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 14:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:13:17 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > This patch-set reworks the kmap_atomic API to be a stack based, instead of
> > static slot based. Some might remember this from last year, some not ;-)
> > 
> > The advantage is that you no longer need to worry about KM_foo, the
> > disadvantage is that kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic now needs to be strictly
> > nested (CONFIG_HIGHMEM_DEBUG should complain in case its not) -- and of
> > course its a big massive patch changing a widely used API.
> 
> Nice.  That fixes the "use of irq-only slots from interrupts-on
> context" bugs which people keep adding.

Ah, I should add a:

  WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() && !irqs_disabled());

like check to ensure people don't use kmap_atomic() in nestable IRQ
contexts (nestable IRQ context is bad anyway) the old debug code I
deleted did something similar.

> We don't have any checks in there for the stack overflowing?

+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
+       BUG_ON(idx > KM_TYPE_NR);
+#endif

Seems to be that.

> Did you add every runtime check you could possibly think of? 
> kmap_atomic_idx_push() and pop() don't have much in there.  It'd be
> good to lard it up with runtime checks for at least a few weeks.

Right, so I currently have:

 - stack size check in push/pop
 - proper nesting check in pop (verifies that the vaddr you try to
   unmap is indeed the top most on the stack)

Aside from the proposed no irq-nesting thing to avoid unbounded
recursion I can't really come up with more creative abuse.

> Well, there's that monster conversion patch.  How's about you
> temporarily do
> 
> #define kmap_atomic(x, arg...)  __kmap_atomic(x)
> 
> so for a while, both kmap_atomic(a, KM_foo) and kmap_atomic(a) are
> turned into __kmap_atomic(a).  Once all the dust has settled, pull that
> out again?

Ah, that's a nifty trick, let me try that. 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] mm, highmem: kmap_atomic rework
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:38:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282315092.2605.1134.camel@laptop> (raw)
Message-ID: <20100820143812.-x3geImqeJBZ-MtWbfNI2IRtf3ngt3434Zxg2k7Y0I0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100819143129.81274c03.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 14:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:13:17 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > This patch-set reworks the kmap_atomic API to be a stack based, instead of
> > static slot based. Some might remember this from last year, some not ;-)
> > 
> > The advantage is that you no longer need to worry about KM_foo, the
> > disadvantage is that kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic now needs to be strictly
> > nested (CONFIG_HIGHMEM_DEBUG should complain in case its not) -- and of
> > course its a big massive patch changing a widely used API.
> 
> Nice.  That fixes the "use of irq-only slots from interrupts-on
> context" bugs which people keep adding.

Ah, I should add a:

  WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() && !irqs_disabled());

like check to ensure people don't use kmap_atomic() in nestable IRQ
contexts (nestable IRQ context is bad anyway) the old debug code I
deleted did something similar.

> We don't have any checks in there for the stack overflowing?

+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
+       BUG_ON(idx > KM_TYPE_NR);
+#endif

Seems to be that.

> Did you add every runtime check you could possibly think of? 
> kmap_atomic_idx_push() and pop() don't have much in there.  It'd be
> good to lard it up with runtime checks for at least a few weeks.

Right, so I currently have:

 - stack size check in push/pop
 - proper nesting check in pop (verifies that the vaddr you try to
   unmap is indeed the top most on the stack)

Aside from the proposed no irq-nesting thing to avoid unbounded
recursion I can't really come up with more creative abuse.

> Well, there's that monster conversion patch.  How's about you
> temporarily do
> 
> #define kmap_atomic(x, arg...)  __kmap_atomic(x)
> 
> so for a while, both kmap_atomic(a, KM_foo) and kmap_atomic(a) are
> turned into __kmap_atomic(a).  Once all the dust has settled, pull that
> out again?

Ah, that's a nifty trick, let me try that. 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-20 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-19 20:13 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] mm, highmem: kmap_atomic rework Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 20:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 20:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] mm: strictly nested kmap_atomic Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 20:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 20:50   ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-20 20:50     ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-24  7:09   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-24  7:09     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-19 20:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] mm: stack based kmap_atomic Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 20:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 21:34   ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-20 21:34     ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-24  7:24   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-24  7:24     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-24  7:35     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-08-24  8:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 20:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] mm, frv: Out-of-line kmap-atomic Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 20:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 21:48   ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-20 21:48     ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-19 20:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] mm: Remove all KM_type arguments Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 20:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 21:44   ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-20 21:44     ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-19 20:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] mm: Fix up KM_type argument removal fallout Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 20:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 21:45   ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-20 21:45     ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-19 20:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] mm: Remove pte_*map_nested() Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-19 20:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-08-20 21:47   ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-20 21:47     ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-19 21:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] mm, highmem: kmap_atomic rework Andrew Morton
2010-08-19 21:31   ` Andrew Morton
2010-08-20 14:38   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-08-20 14:38     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1282315092.2605.1134.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.