From: Rustam Adilov <adilov@disroot.org>
To: markus.stockhausen@gmx.de
Cc: 'Chris Packham' <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
'Daniel Lezcano' <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: [PATCH] clocksource: rtl-otto: Change driver to use __raw reads and writes
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 18:21:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1282957d0625682218b277f0f92f5d7f@disroot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <007b01dce48e$dbebb9a0$93c32ce0$@gmx.de>
On 2026-05-15 17:18, markus.stockhausen@gmx.de wrote:
>> Von: Rustam Adilov <adilov@disroot.org>
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Mai 2026 16:33
>> An: markus.stockhausen@gmx.de
>> Betreff: Re: AW: [PATCH] clocksource: rtl-otto: Change driver to use __raw
> reads and writes
>> ...
>> > IIRC the current functions use memory barriers while the
>> > new ones do not. Timers are critical and cost me a lot
>> > of time in the past [1]. We nearly lost support for several
>> > devices last year. So I like to have at least some stability
>> > confirmation from downstream.
>>
>> As far as i can see, if you untangle the the BUILDIO_MEM(l, u32) in [1]
>> you should see they do have barriers as denoted by barrier argument being
> set.
>> So that means, in MIPS, both readl/writel are the same as their __raw
> variants.
>> And both ioread32/iowrite32 are using readl/writel under the hood so...
>
> Hi,
>
> will the __relaxed functions serve your IO_SWAP scenario too?
>
> Markus
Not really because the readl_relaxed and readl appear to be both mapped to ioswabl
which changes behavior as per IO_SWAP config [1].
[1] - https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0.6/source/arch/mips/include/asm/io.h#L49
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 13:15 [PATCH] clocksource: rtl-otto: Change driver to use __raw reads and writes Rustam Adilov
2026-05-13 18:31 ` Rustam Adilov
2026-05-13 21:05 ` Chris Packham
2026-05-14 20:50 ` AW: " markus.stockhausen
2026-05-15 14:32 ` Rustam Adilov
2026-05-15 17:18 ` AW: " markus.stockhausen
2026-05-15 18:21 ` Rustam Adilov [this message]
2026-05-15 18:39 ` AW: " markus.stockhausen
2026-05-15 19:47 ` Rustam Adilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1282957d0625682218b277f0f92f5d7f@disroot.org \
--to=adilov@disroot.org \
--cc=Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.stockhausen@gmx.de \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.