All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, afaerber@suse.de,
	liuwei@actions-semi.com, mp-cs@actions-semi.com,
	96boards@ucrobotics.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, daniel.thompson@linaro.org,
	amit.kucheria@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	hzhang@ucrobotics.com, bdong@ucrobotics.com,
	manivannanece23@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: actions: Add gpio support for Actions S900 SoC
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 11:18:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12834501.5lBvNSZm06@debian64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180518023056.7869-5-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

On Friday, May 18, 2018 4:30:55 AM CEST Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Add gpio support to pinctrl driver for Actions Semi S900 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
> [...]
> +static int owl_gpio_init(struct owl_pinctrl *pctrl)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *chip;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	chip = &pctrl->chip;
> +	chip->base = -1;
> +	chip->ngpio = pctrl->soc->ngpios;
> +	chip->label = dev_name(pctrl->dev);
> +	chip->parent = pctrl->dev;
> +	chip->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +	chip->of_node = pctrl->dev->of_node;
> +
> +	ret = gpiochip_add_data(&pctrl->chip, pctrl);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(pctrl->dev, "failed to register gpiochip\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip, dev_name(pctrl->dev),
> +							0, 0, chip->ngpio);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(pctrl->dev, "failed to add pin range\n");
> +		gpiochip_remove(&pctrl->chip);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
gpiochip_add_pin_range()? That's not going to work with gpio-hogs. 

But, you can easily test this. Just add a gpio-hog [0] 
( Section 2. gpio-controller nodes) into the Devicetree's
pinctrl node.

something like: (No idea if GPIO1 is already used, but any free
gpio will do)
| 		[...]
|		pinctrl@e01b0000 {
|			compatible = "actions,s900-pinctrl";
|			reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
|			clocks = <&cmu CLK_GPIO>;
|			gpio-controller;
|			#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
|			line_b {
|				gpio-hog;
|				gpios = <1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
|				output-low;
|				line-name = "foo-bar-gpio";
|			};
|		};

The pinctrl probe will fail. You can fix this by
replacing the gpiochip_add_pin_range() and use
the gpio-ranges [0] property to define the range.

[0] <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: chunkeey@gmail.com (Christian Lamparter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: actions: Add gpio support for Actions S900 SoC
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 11:18:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12834501.5lBvNSZm06@debian64> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180518023056.7869-5-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>

On Friday, May 18, 2018 4:30:55 AM CEST Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Add gpio support to pinctrl driver for Actions Semi S900 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
> [...]
> +static int owl_gpio_init(struct owl_pinctrl *pctrl)
> +{
> +	struct gpio_chip *chip;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	chip = &pctrl->chip;
> +	chip->base = -1;
> +	chip->ngpio = pctrl->soc->ngpios;
> +	chip->label = dev_name(pctrl->dev);
> +	chip->parent = pctrl->dev;
> +	chip->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +	chip->of_node = pctrl->dev->of_node;
> +
> +	ret = gpiochip_add_data(&pctrl->chip, pctrl);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(pctrl->dev, "failed to register gpiochip\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = gpiochip_add_pin_range(&pctrl->chip, dev_name(pctrl->dev),
> +							0, 0, chip->ngpio);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(pctrl->dev, "failed to add pin range\n");
> +		gpiochip_remove(&pctrl->chip);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
gpiochip_add_pin_range()? That's not going to work with gpio-hogs. 

But, you can easily test this. Just add a gpio-hog [0] 
( Section 2. gpio-controller nodes) into the Devicetree's
pinctrl node.

something like: (No idea if GPIO1 is already used, but any free
gpio will do)
| 		[...]
|		pinctrl at e01b0000 {
|			compatible = "actions,s900-pinctrl";
|			reg = <0x0 0xe01b0000 0x0 0x1000>;
|			clocks = <&cmu CLK_GPIO>;
|			gpio-controller;
|			#gpio-cells = <2>;
|
|			line_b {
|				gpio-hog;
|				gpios = <1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
|				output-low;
|				line-name = "foo-bar-gpio";
|			};
|		};

The pinctrl probe will fail. You can fix this by
replacing the gpiochip_add_pin_range() and use
the gpio-ranges [0] property to define the range.

[0] <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-19  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-18  2:30 [PATCH 0/5] Add gpio support for Action Semi S900 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add gpio bindings for Actions " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: dts: actions: Add gpio properties to pinctrl node for S900 Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: actions: Add gpio line names to Bubblegum-96 board Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: actions: Add gpio support for Actions S900 SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18 21:43   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-05-18 21:43     ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-05-19  9:18   ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2018-05-19  9:18     ` Christian Lamparter
2018-05-19 10:11     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-19 10:11       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add Actions Semi S900 pinctrl entries Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-05-18  2:30   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12834501.5lBvNSZm06@debian64 \
    --to=chunkeey@gmail.com \
    --cc=96boards@ucrobotics.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bdong@ucrobotics.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hzhang@ucrobotics.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuwei@actions-semi.com \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=manivannanece23@gmail.com \
    --cc=mp-cs@actions-semi.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.