From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
rainbow lum <rainbowlum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: phyX enumeration conflict
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:16:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286698604.3547.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286698152.3547.4.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 10:09 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> The commit failed to take into account that allocated wireless devices
> (wiphys) are not added into the device list upon allocation, but only
> when they are registered. Therefore, it opened up a race between
> allocating and registering a name, so that if two processes allocate and
> register concurrently ("alloc, alloc, register, register" rather than
> "alloc, register, alloc, register") the code will attempt to use the
> same name twice.
And as for the actual feature, as far as I'm concerned the discussion
ends here because we otherwise need to use something as complex as idr.
A udev rule can't break the kernel and works just as well, even if
you'll have to use a different namespace, i.e. not "phy%d" -- use say
"wiphy%d" instead.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-10 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-08 19:59 phyX enumeration conflict Christian Lamparter
2010-10-10 8:09 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-10 8:16 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2010-10-10 15:39 ` Ben Greear
2010-10-10 16:43 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 17:26 ` Ben Greear
2010-10-11 17:34 ` Johannes Berg
2010-10-11 17:46 ` Ben Greear
2010-10-11 17:56 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286698604.3547.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=rainbowlum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.