All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Cc: eparis@redhat.com, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>,
	warthog9@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, devel@lists.fedoraprojet.org
Subject: Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory?
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:59:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287323960.1998.360.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinNbF9=5Ojn8kKEvSkGbpqQw+DGKyRWhAD1AYZK@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 09:12 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> We could split this into 2 structures, thus greatly shrinking the size
> of the structure needed for the default/disabled case,

Well, it does suck it needs to bloat data and code when its effectively
disabled. Isn't there a way to gather this data before we enable it, eg.
scan the files list on enable or somesuch?

I mean, if you mandate an external storage you might as well extend
struct inode, that's cheaper in each respect.

Me, I'm henceforth making sure to have CONFIG_IMA disabled...

>  but it doesn't
> help the fact that the suggested structure for storage (the radix
> tree) is apparently quite inefficient.  I'd love to hear other
> suggestions for a better structure.... 

radix tree is efficient for dense sets, not sparse sets.



  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-17 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-16  6:52 ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory? Dave Chinner
2010-10-16 19:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-16 21:10   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-17  0:35     ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17  0:54       ` J.H.
2010-10-17  2:11         ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 18:12           ` J.H.
2010-10-17  0:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17  1:09       ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-17  1:13         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17  5:49           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-17  5:40       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-17 18:46         ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-18  0:49           ` James Morris
2010-10-18  6:25             ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-18  6:36               ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-18  9:29                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 13:31                   ` Mimi Zohar
2010-10-18 20:50                     ` Ware, Ryan R
2010-10-26  7:31                       ` Pavel Machek
2010-10-18 16:03               ` Mimi Zohar
2010-10-18 19:24                 ` John Stoffel
2010-10-18 16:46               ` Ryan Ware
2010-10-18 16:48               ` Eric Paris
2010-10-18 17:10                 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-18 17:34                 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-18 17:56                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-18 18:13                   ` Eric Paris
2010-10-18 18:19                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-18 18:43                       ` Eric Paris
2010-10-19  0:58                       ` Eric Paris
2010-10-18 18:06                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-18 18:11                   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-18 18:13                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-25 13:18             ` Pavel Machek
2010-10-17  5:57   ` Mimi Zohar
2010-10-17 11:02     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-17 13:12       ` Eric Paris
2010-10-17 13:59         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-10-17 14:04           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-17 14:16           ` Eric Paris
2010-10-18 11:57             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18 14:59               ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-18 15:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18 15:02                 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-17 18:52           ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-18 16:44             ` Ryan Ware
2010-10-18  0:07         ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17 14:09       ` Mimi Zohar
2010-10-17 18:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17 19:39     ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-18 15:09 Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1287323960.1998.360.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=devel@lists.fedoraprojet.org \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog9@kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.