From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>,
warthog9@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, devel@lists.fedoraprojet.org
Subject: Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory?
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:20:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101016192027.GA6883@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101016065206.GO4681@dastard>
Besides the algorithmic problems with ima, why is kernel.org using
IMA to start with? Except for IBM looking for a reason to jusity why
TPM isn't a completely waster of ressources it's pointless. And it was
only merged under the premise that it would not affect innocent normal
users.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-16 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-16 6:52 ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of memory? Dave Chinner
2010-10-16 19:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-10-16 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-17 0:35 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17 0:54 ` J.H.
2010-10-17 2:11 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 18:12 ` J.H.
2010-10-17 0:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17 1:09 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-17 1:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17 5:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-17 5:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-17 18:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-18 0:49 ` James Morris
2010-10-18 6:25 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-18 6:36 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-18 9:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-18 13:31 ` Mimi Zohar
2010-10-18 20:50 ` Ware, Ryan R
2010-10-26 7:31 ` Pavel Machek
2010-10-18 16:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2010-10-18 19:24 ` John Stoffel
2010-10-18 16:46 ` Ryan Ware
2010-10-18 16:48 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-18 17:10 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-18 17:34 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-18 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-18 18:13 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-18 18:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-18 18:43 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-19 0:58 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-18 18:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-18 18:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-18 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-10-25 13:18 ` Pavel Machek
2010-10-17 5:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2010-10-17 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-17 13:12 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-17 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-17 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-17 14:16 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-18 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18 14:59 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-18 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-18 15:02 ` Eric Paris
2010-10-17 18:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-18 16:44 ` Ryan Ware
2010-10-18 0:07 ` Dave Chinner
2010-10-17 14:09 ` Mimi Zohar
2010-10-17 18:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-10-17 19:39 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-18 15:09 Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101016192027.GA6883@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=devel@lists.fedoraprojet.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=warthog9@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.