From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_log()
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:48:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288993685.2065.5.camel@cowboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288993499.2065.4.camel@cowboy>
Sorry, the title should have been:
[PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_poll()
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 18:44 -0300, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review this patch, I am not very familiar with MCE/RCU so I'm not sure that this is the correct fix (otherwise consider it a bug report :)).
> This does "fix" the message though and I can use MCE normally.
>
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
>
>
> From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
>
> Based on the following message:
>
> ===================================================
> [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> ---------------------------------------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> no locks held by mcelog/2350.
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 2350, comm: mcelog Tainted: G W 2.6.37-rc1+ #7
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8108e6d4>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xa4/0xc0
> [<ffffffff810189e9>] mce_poll+0xa9/0xd0
> [<ffffffff81160585>] do_sys_poll+0x275/0x550
> [<ffffffff8115f0e0>] ? __pollwait+0x0/0xf0
> [<ffffffff8115f1d0>] ? pollwake+0x0/0x60
> [<ffffffff8115f1d0>] ? pollwake+0x0/0x60
> [<ffffffff8130431c>] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x2c/0x30
> [<ffffffff8130549a>] ? radix_tree_lookup_element+0xda/0x100
> [<ffffffff81121f08>] ? __do_fault+0x128/0x470
> [<ffffffff81100bdb>] ? filemap_fault+0xdb/0x4e0
> [<ffffffff810ffe75>] ? unlock_page+0x25/0x30
> [<ffffffff81069ddf>] ? sigprocmask+0x3f/0x100
> [<ffffffff8183672b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x60
> [<ffffffff8108fefd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
> [<ffffffff8108ff4d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [<ffffffff8183672b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x60
> [<ffffffff811608a7>] sys_ppoll+0x47/0x190
> [<ffffffff8108fefd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
> [<ffffffff81835d39>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> [<ffffffff810030eb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> At this point the arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> no locks held by mcelog/2350.
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 2350, comm: mcelog Tainted: G W 2.6.37-rc1+ #7
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8108e6d4>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xa4/0xc0
> [<ffffffff810189e9>] mce_poll+0xa9/0xd0
> [<ffffffff81160585>] do_sys_poll+0x275/0x550
> [<ffffffff8115f0e0>] ? __pollwait+0x0/0xf0
> [<ffffffff8115f1d0>] ? pollwake+0x0/0x60
> [<ffffffff8115f1d0>] ? pollwake+0x0/0x60
> [<ffffffff8130431c>] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x2c/0x30
> [<ffffffff8130549a>] ? radix_tree_lookup_element+0xda/0x100
> [<ffffffff81121f08>] ? __do_fault+0x128/0x470
> [<ffffffff81100bdb>] ? filemap_fault+0xdb/0x4e0
> [<ffffffff810ffe75>] ? unlock_page+0x25/0x30
> [<ffffffff81069ddf>] ? sigprocmask+0x3f/0x100
> [<ffffffff8183672b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x60
> [<ffffffff8108fefd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
> [<ffffffff8108ff4d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [<ffffffff8183672b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x60
> [<ffffffff811608a7>] sys_ppoll+0x47/0x190
> [<ffffffff8108fefd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
> [<ffffffff81835d39>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> [<ffffffff810030eb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> At this point the lockdep_is_held(&mce_read_mutex) call is failing.
> So check if the mce_read_mutex is held before derefencing instead of using rcu_dereference_check_mce()
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> index 7a35b72..6f95b2c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> @@ -1625,8 +1625,12 @@ out:
> static unsigned int mce_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> {
> poll_wait(file, &mce_wait, wait);
> - if (rcu_dereference_check_mce(mcelog.next))
> - return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> +
> + if (mutex_is_locked(&mce_read_mutex)) {
> + if (rcu_dereference_index_check(mcelog.next,
> + rcu_read_lock_sched_held()))
> + return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> + }
> if (!mce_apei_read_done && apei_check_mce())
> return POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> return 0;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-05 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-05 21:44 [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_log() Davidlohr Bueso
2010-11-05 21:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2010-11-06 18:53 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-07 13:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-08 11:30 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2010-11-08 13:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-10 13:44 ` [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_poll() Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-29 9:45 ` [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_log() Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-31 1:14 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-31 1:37 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-31 2:13 ` [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_poll() Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-31 9:30 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, mce: Fix " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-31 10:03 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-31 16:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-31 21:32 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-31 22:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288993685.2065.5.camel@cowboy \
--to=dave@gnu.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.