All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_poll()
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:44:55 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289396695.2208.0.camel@cowboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101108131708.GC2580@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 05:17 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 08:30:19AM -0300, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 05:39 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:53:50PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 06:44:59PM -0300, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please review this patch, I am not very familiar with MCE/RCU so I'm not sure that this is the correct fix (otherwise consider it a bug report :)).
> > > > > This does "fix" the message though and I can use MCE normally.
> > > > 
> > > > The patch is certainly not correct. The variable needs to be read
> > > > independently of the mutex.
> > > 
> > > This code is simply checking the value of the pointer, and therefore
> > > need not protect any actual dereferences.  So why not replace the
> > > rcu_dereference_check_mce() with rcu_access_pointer()?  If this is
> > > OK, please see the patch below.
> > > 
> > > BTW, assigning the value returned by rcu_access_pointer() into a
> > > variable often indicates a bug.  ;-)
> > > 
> > > 							Thanx, Paul
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > > index 7a35b72..4d29d50 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
> > > @@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ out:
> > >  static unsigned int mce_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> > >  {
> > >  	poll_wait(file, &mce_wait, wait);
> > > -	if (rcu_dereference_check_mce(mcelog.next))
> > > +	if (rcu_access_pointer(mcelog.next))
> > 
> > this doesn't compile (mcelog.next is an index):
> > 
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c: In function ‘mce_poll’:
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628: error: invalid type argument of
> > ‘unary *’ (have ‘unsigned int’)
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628: warning: type defaults to ‘int’
> > in declaration of ‘_________p1’
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628: error: invalid type argument of
> > ‘unary *’ (have ‘unsigned int’)
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628: warning: type defaults to ‘int’
> > in declaration of ‘type name’
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628: warning: cast to pointer from
> > integer of different size
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628: error: invalid type argument of
> > ‘unary *’ (have ‘unsigned int’)
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1628: warning: type defaults to ‘int’
> > in declaration of ‘type name’
> > make[4]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.o] Error 1
> > 
> > 
> > Since the mutex is independent, what about this patch?
> 
> Looks good to me!
> 
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 

Andi, any further thoughts?

Thanks,
Davidlohr


  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-10 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-05 21:44 [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_log() Davidlohr Bueso
2010-11-05 21:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2010-11-06 18:53 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-07 13:39   ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-08 11:30     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2010-11-08 13:17       ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-11-10 13:44         ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2011-03-29  9:45         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-31  1:14           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-31  1:37             ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-31  2:13               ` [PATCH] mce: fix RCU lockdep from mce_poll() Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-31  9:30                 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, mce: Fix " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2011-03-31 10:03                   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-31 16:41                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-31 21:32                       ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-03-31 22:50                         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1289396695.2208.0.camel@cowboy \
    --to=dave@gnu.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.