From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@nokia.com>
To: ext Kalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com>
Cc: "ext Gábor Stefanik" <netrolller.3d@gmail.com>,
"ext Grazvydas Ignotas" <notasas@gmail.com>,
"Shahar Levi" <shahar_levi@ti.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] wl1271: Change wl12xx Files Names
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:16:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1289207768.8423.15.camel@chilepepper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oca1zbt0.fsf@purkki.adurom.net>
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:07 +0100, ext Kalle Valo wrote:
> Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@nokia.com> writes:
>
> >> What about wl1251 vs. wl12agn (or wl12bgn if no .11a support), like iwlwifi?
> >
> > Hmmm... wl1251 supports bg. wl12xx supports abgn. I don't really see
> > the logic in this? What difference does it make comparing to calling it
> > wl12xx? From wl12agn the user still doesn't know whether wl1251 is
> > supported or not.
>
> Just to confuse even more: TI wl1253 (the chip) supports 11a and it
> would be easy to add wl1253 (the chip) support to wl1251 (the driver).
> I just haven't seen any linux devices using wl1253 yet.
Oh, I didn't even know that wl1253 even existed. :) But yeah, it
complicates things even more indeed.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-04 15:07 [PATCH v4] wl1271: Change wl12xx Files Names Shahar Levi
2010-11-04 16:37 ` Grazvydas Ignotas
2010-11-04 17:19 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-11-04 21:48 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-11-04 21:52 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-11-07 10:07 ` Kalle Valo
2010-11-08 9:16 ` Luciano Coelho [this message]
2010-11-17 18:08 ` Gabay, Benzy
2010-11-17 18:48 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-11-18 2:13 ` Gabay, Benzy
2010-11-18 5:18 ` Krakowski, Oz
2010-11-18 6:21 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1289207768.8423.15.camel@chilepepper \
--to=luciano.coelho@nokia.com \
--cc=kvalo@adurom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netrolller.3d@gmail.com \
--cc=notasas@gmail.com \
--cc=shahar_levi@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.