From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mutex: Introduce arch_mutex_cpu_relax()
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:47:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290437256.7455.4.camel@thinkpad> (raw)
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
The spinning mutex implementation uses cpu_relax() in busy loops as a
compiler barrier. Depending on the architecture, cpu_relax() may do more
than needed in this specific mutex spin loops. On System z we also give
up the time slice of the virtual cpu in cpu_relax(), which prevents
effective spinning on the mutex.
This patch replaces cpu_relax() in the spinning mutex code with
arch_mutex_cpu_relax(), which can be defined by each architecture that
selects HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX. The default is still cpu_relax(), so
this patch should not affect other architectures than System z for now.
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/Kconfig | 3 +++
arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/s390/include/asm/mutex.h | 2 ++
include/linux/mutex.h | 4 ++++
kernel/mutex.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched.c | 3 ++-
6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -175,4 +175,7 @@ config HAVE_PERF_EVENTS_NMI
config HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
bool
+config HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
+ bool
+
source "kernel/gcov/Kconfig"
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ config S390
select HAVE_KERNEL_LZMA
select HAVE_KERNEL_LZO
select HAVE_GET_USER_PAGES_FAST
+ select HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK
select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_TRYLOCK_BH
select ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mutex.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mutex.h
@@ -7,3 +7,5 @@
*/
#include <asm-generic/mutex-dec.h>
+
+#define arch_mutex_cpu_relax() barrier()
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -160,4 +160,8 @@ extern int mutex_trylock(struct mutex *l
extern void mutex_unlock(struct mutex *lock);
extern int atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(atomic_t *cnt, struct mutex *lock);
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_MUTEX_CPU_RELAX
+#define arch_mutex_cpu_relax() cpu_relax()
+#endif
+
#endif
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
* memory barriers as we'll eventually observe the right
* values at the cost of a few extra spins.
*/
- cpu_relax();
+ arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
}
#endif
spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
#include <asm/tlb.h>
#include <asm/irq_regs.h>
+#include <asm/mutex.h>
#include "sched_cpupri.h"
#include "workqueue_sched.h"
@@ -4029,7 +4030,7 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lo
if (task_thread_info(rq->curr) != owner || need_resched())
return 0;
- cpu_relax();
+ arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
}
return 1;
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-22 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 14:47 Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2010-11-22 20:10 ` [PATCH] mutex: Introduce arch_mutex_cpu_relax() Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 14:12 ` Gerald Schaefer
2010-11-23 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-23 15:03 ` Gerald Schaefer
2010-11-26 15:02 ` [tip:sched/core] mutexes, sched: " tip-bot for Gerald Schaefer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-14 15:33 [PATCH] mutex: Introduce mutex_cpu_relax() Gerald Schaefer
2010-10-14 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-14 17:31 ` Gerald Schaefer
2010-10-14 17:40 ` Gerald Schaefer
2010-10-14 22:13 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-15 10:55 ` Gerald Schaefer
2010-10-15 11:07 ` [PATCH] mutex: Introduce arch_mutex_cpu_relax() Gerald Schaefer
2010-10-18 18:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-19 12:24 ` Gerald Schaefer
2010-10-19 15:18 ` Gerald Schaefer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290437256.7455.4.camel@thinkpad \
--to=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.