From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Free memory never fully used, swapping
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:40:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290739243.12777.17.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101126110244.B6DC.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:31 +0800, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > record the order seems not sufficient. in balance_pgdat(), the for look
> > exit only when:
> > priority <0 or sc.nr_reclaimed >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX.
> > but we do if (sc.nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> > order = sc.order = 0;
> > this means before we set order to 0, we already reclaimed a lot of
> > pages, so I thought we need set order to 0 earlier before there are
> > enough free pages. below is a debug patch.
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index d31d7ce..ee5d2ed 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -2117,6 +2117,26 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +static int all_zone_enough_free_pages(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++) {
> > + struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> > +
> > + if (!populated_zone(zone))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, high_wmark_pages(zone) * 8,
> > + 0, 0))
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* is kswapd sleeping prematurely? */
> > static int sleeping_prematurely(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining)
> > {
> > @@ -2355,7 +2375,8 @@ out:
> > * back to sleep. High-order users can still perform direct
> > * reclaim if they wish.
> > */
> > - if (sc.nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> > + if (sc.nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX ||
> > + (order > 0 && all_zone_enough_free_pages(pgdat)))
> > order = sc.order = 0;
>
> Ummm. this doesn't work. this place is processed every 32 pages reclaimed.
> (see below code and comment). Theresore your patch break high order reclaim
> logic.
Yes, this will break high order reclaim, but we need a compromise.
wrongly reclaim pages is more worse. could increase the watermark in
all_zone_enough_free_pages() better?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Free memory never fully used, swapping
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:40:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290739243.12777.17.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101126110244.B6DC.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:31 +0800, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > record the order seems not sufficient. in balance_pgdat(), the for look
> > exit only when:
> > priority <0 or sc.nr_reclaimed >= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX.
> > but we do if (sc.nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> > order = sc.order = 0;
> > this means before we set order to 0, we already reclaimed a lot of
> > pages, so I thought we need set order to 0 earlier before there are
> > enough free pages. below is a debug patch.
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index d31d7ce..ee5d2ed 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -2117,6 +2117,26 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont,
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +static int all_zone_enough_free_pages(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++) {
> > + struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> > +
> > + if (!populated_zone(zone))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, high_wmark_pages(zone) * 8,
> > + 0, 0))
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* is kswapd sleeping prematurely? */
> > static int sleeping_prematurely(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining)
> > {
> > @@ -2355,7 +2375,8 @@ out:
> > * back to sleep. High-order users can still perform direct
> > * reclaim if they wish.
> > */
> > - if (sc.nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX)
> > + if (sc.nr_reclaimed < SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX ||
> > + (order > 0 && all_zone_enough_free_pages(pgdat)))
> > order = sc.order = 0;
>
> Ummm. this doesn't work. this place is processed every 32 pages reclaimed.
> (see below code and comment). Theresore your patch break high order reclaim
> logic.
Yes, this will break high order reclaim, but we need a compromise.
wrongly reclaim pages is more worse. could increase the watermark in
all_zone_enough_free_pages() better?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-15 19:52 Free memory never fully used, swapping Simon Kirby
2010-11-22 23:44 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-22 23:44 ` Andrew Morton
2010-11-23 1:34 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-23 1:34 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-23 8:35 ` Dave Hansen
2010-11-23 8:35 ` Dave Hansen
2010-11-24 8:46 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-24 8:46 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-25 1:07 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-25 1:07 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-25 9:03 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-25 9:03 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-25 10:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-25 10:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-25 17:13 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-25 17:13 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-26 0:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-26 0:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-25 10:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-25 10:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-25 16:15 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-25 16:15 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-26 2:00 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-26 2:00 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-26 2:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-26 2:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-26 2:40 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
2010-11-26 2:40 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-26 9:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-26 9:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-29 1:03 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-29 1:03 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-29 1:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-29 1:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-26 0:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-26 0:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-25 16:12 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-25 16:12 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-26 1:05 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-26 1:05 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-26 1:25 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-26 1:25 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-26 2:05 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-26 2:05 ` Shaohua Li
2010-11-26 11:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-26 11:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-26 11:11 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-26 11:11 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-30 6:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30 6:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30 10:41 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-30 10:41 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-30 11:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30 11:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30 8:22 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-30 8:22 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-29 9:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-29 9:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-23 10:04 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-23 10:04 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-24 6:43 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-24 6:43 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-24 9:27 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-24 9:27 ` Mel Gorman
2010-11-24 19:17 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-24 19:17 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-25 1:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-25 1:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-26 15:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 15:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-30 0:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30 0:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-11-30 19:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-30 19:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-01 10:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-01 10:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-01 15:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-01 15:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 2:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-02 2:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-02 14:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-12-02 14:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-30 9:13 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-30 9:13 ` Simon Kirby
2010-11-30 19:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-30 19:13 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290739243.12777.17.camel@sli10-conroe \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=sim@hostway.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.