Re: [PATCH 6/7] e1000e: cleanup: swap arguments to avoid checkpatch errors

[Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>]

On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 02:40 +0000, Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen wrote:
> Swap argument order in order to avoid checkpatch treating it as an
> unary operation, instead of an binary one, and obtain consistency
> with the 3 other similar assignments in netdev.c (tdlen & rdlen).
> 
> This patch fixes 3 checkpatch errors.

You have got to be kidding.  If the checkpatch warning offends you, fix
the bug in checkpatch instead of changing perfectly good code.

Ben.

> Signed-off-by: Asbjoern Sloth Toennesen <asbjorn@asbjorn.biz>
> ---
>  drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
> index bb6a1f5..bdd3774 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -2059,7 +2059,7 @@ int e1000e_setup_tx_resources(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>  	struct e1000_ring *tx_ring = adapter->tx_ring;
>  	int err = -ENOMEM, size;
>  
> -	size = sizeof(struct e1000_buffer) * tx_ring->count;
> +	size = tx_ring->count * sizeof(struct e1000_buffer);
>  	tx_ring->buffer_info = vzalloc(size);
>  	if (!tx_ring->buffer_info)
>  		goto err;
> @@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ int e1000e_setup_rx_resources(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>  	struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info;
>  	int i, size, desc_len, err = -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	size = sizeof(struct e1000_buffer) * rx_ring->count;
> +	size = rx_ring->count * sizeof(struct e1000_buffer);
>  	rx_ring->buffer_info = vzalloc(size);
>  	if (!rx_ring->buffer_info)
>  		goto err;
> @@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ static void e1000_clean_tx_ring(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>  		e1000_put_txbuf(adapter, buffer_info);
>  	}
>  
> -	size = sizeof(struct e1000_buffer) * tx_ring->count;
> +	size = tx_ring->count * sizeof(struct e1000_buffer);
>  	memset(tx_ring->buffer_info, 0, size);
>  
>  	memset(tx_ring->desc, 0, tx_ring->size);

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.