From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3 v3] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 21:19:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291925943.6803.50.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=GeCHZ23J5UDoUfbWnLHfVWCeA7f9Gh_sKYSqa@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 21:15 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:20 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> >> + /* Check CPUID signatures: 06_1AH, 06_1EH, 06_1FH */
> >> + family = boot_cpu_data.x86;
> >> + model = boot_cpu_data.x86_model;
> >> + if (family != 6 || (model != 0x1A && model != 0x1E && model != 0x1F))
> >> + return;
> >
> > So that's 26, 30 and 31? Curiously
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c does have 31.
That was clearly meant to say: doesn't.. Does Intel have an exhaustive
model list somewhere?
> It is also missing model 44 (0x2c).
Right.. but if the westmere uncore is the same, then its also missing
37.
The -EX chips have a different uncore, right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-09 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-02 5:20 [RFC PATCH 2/3 v3] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu Lin Ming
2010-12-02 5:57 ` Lin Ming
2010-12-07 6:15 ` Lin Ming
2010-12-09 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-09 19:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-09 20:15 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-12-09 20:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-09 20:27 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-12-09 23:46 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-12-10 8:31 ` Lin Ming
2010-12-10 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 10:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 15:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-12-11 5:49 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-12-13 8:27 ` Lin Ming
2010-12-13 16:42 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-12-13 16:51 ` Andi Kleen
2010-12-13 19:04 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-12-10 8:28 ` Lin Ming
2010-12-09 19:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-10 8:28 ` Lin Ming
2011-01-13 17:14 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-01-17 1:29 ` Lin Ming
2011-01-17 8:44 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-01-17 10:51 ` Lin Ming
2011-01-17 10:56 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291925943.6803.50.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.