From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:39:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294249159.2016.275.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D24ABD7.4040503@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 19:35 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Tejun, why did you end up not using preempt_notifiers in cmwq?
Because I told him to use explicit function calls because that keeps the
code easier to read.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-05 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-03 21:26 [RFC -v3 PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Rik van Riel
2011-01-03 21:27 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 1/3] kvm: keep track of which task is running a KVM vcpu Rik van Riel
2011-01-03 21:29 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 1:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 6:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-04 12:03 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 2:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-05 8:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 8:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-05 9:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 9:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-05 9:34 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 3:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-04 14:28 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:41 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:44 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 16:51 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:51 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:54 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 17:02 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 17:12 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 17:53 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 18:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 18:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 18:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-05 16:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-05 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 17:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-07 5:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13 3:02 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-13 3:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13 5:08 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-06 14:33 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-05 17:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 17:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 17:19 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 17:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-01-06 3:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-03 21:30 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 3/3] Subject: kvm: use yield_to instead of sleep in kvm_vcpu_on_spin Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 6:42 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-04 10:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 10:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-04 9:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-04 10:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294249159.2016.275.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.