From: "Michael Büsch" <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: b43-dev <b43-dev@lists.infradead.org>,
wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Odd behavior of ssb, b43, b43legacy, and b44
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 04:34:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294371276.15564.0.camel@maggie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D262109.20504@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20110106_210800_770742_63AA2C67)
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 14:07 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On one of my boxes, I have installed two PCI-format BCM43xx cards for testing.
> One is a BCM4306 Rev. 3, which uses b43. The other is a BCM4303, which uses
> b43legacy. The output of lspci -nn for these devices is
>
> 01:09.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g
> Wireless LAN Controller [14e4:4320] (rev 03)
> 01:0a.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4303 802.11b Wireless
> LAN Controller [14e4:4301] (rev 02)
>
> Upon booting, I noticed the following messages in the log:
>
> b44: b44.c:v2.0
> b44: Invalid MAC address found in EEPROM
> b44 ssb1:1: Problem fetching invariants of chip, aborting
>
> b44: probe of ssb1:1 failed with error -22
>
> As this box does not have a b44 installed, I wondered why this was happening.
> When I unloaded all the drivers and used modprobe to load ssb, I found that b43,
> b43legacy and b44 were all loaded. The console output is
>
> finger at pam:~> lsmod | grep b4 <== none loaded
> finger at pam:~> sudo modprobe -v ssb <== load ssb
> insmod /lib/modules/2.6.37-wl+/kernel/drivers/ssb/ssb.ko
>
> The above looks normal, but look at what is now resident!
>
> finger at pam:~> lsmod | grep b4
> b43legacy 115302 0
> b44 28767 0
> b43 174321 0
> ssb 38157 3 b43legacy,b44,b43
> mac80211 266240 2 b43legacy,b43
> cfg80211 161930 3 b43legacy,b43,mac80211
>
> Any idea why loading ssb should silently load b43legacy AND b44? Any ideas on
> where to look?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Larry
>
Does one of these wireless cards have a dangling ethernet core? I would
not be surprised...
--
Greetings Michael.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael Büsch" <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: b43-dev <b43-dev@lists.infradead.org>,
wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Odd behavior of ssb, b43, b43legacy, and b44
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 04:34:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294371276.15564.0.camel@maggie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D262109.20504@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20110106_210800_770742_63AA2C67)
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 14:07 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On one of my boxes, I have installed two PCI-format BCM43xx cards for testing.
> One is a BCM4306 Rev. 3, which uses b43. The other is a BCM4303, which uses
> b43legacy. The output of lspci -nn for these devices is
>
> 01:09.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4306 802.11b/g
> Wireless LAN Controller [14e4:4320] (rev 03)
> 01:0a.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4303 802.11b Wireless
> LAN Controller [14e4:4301] (rev 02)
>
> Upon booting, I noticed the following messages in the log:
>
> b44: b44.c:v2.0
> b44: Invalid MAC address found in EEPROM
> b44 ssb1:1: Problem fetching invariants of chip, aborting
>
> b44: probe of ssb1:1 failed with error -22
>
> As this box does not have a b44 installed, I wondered why this was happening.
> When I unloaded all the drivers and used modprobe to load ssb, I found that b43,
> b43legacy and b44 were all loaded. The console output is
>
> finger@pam:~> lsmod | grep b4 <== none loaded
> finger@pam:~> sudo modprobe -v ssb <== load ssb
> insmod /lib/modules/2.6.37-wl+/kernel/drivers/ssb/ssb.ko
>
> The above looks normal, but look at what is now resident!
>
> finger@pam:~> lsmod | grep b4
> b43legacy 115302 0
> b44 28767 0
> b43 174321 0
> ssb 38157 3 b43legacy,b44,b43
> mac80211 266240 2 b43legacy,b43
> cfg80211 161930 3 b43legacy,b43,mac80211
>
> Any idea why loading ssb should silently load b43legacy AND b44? Any ideas on
> where to look?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Larry
>
Does one of these wireless cards have a dangling ethernet core? I would
not be surprised...
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-07 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-06 20:07 Odd behavior of ssb, b43, b43legacy, and b44 Larry Finger
2011-01-06 20:07 ` Larry Finger
2011-01-07 3:34 ` Michael Büsch [this message]
2011-01-07 3:34 ` Michael Büsch
2011-01-07 4:31 ` Larry Finger
2011-01-07 4:31 ` Larry Finger
2011-01-07 14:45 ` Michael Büsch
2011-01-07 14:45 ` Michael Büsch
2011-01-07 18:03 ` Larry Finger
2011-01-07 18:03 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294371276.15564.0.camel@maggie \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.