From: Onkalo Samu <samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com>
To: ext Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
mingo@elte.hu,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Onkalo Samu.P" <samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:58:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295441881.11678.41.camel@kolo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295436632.30950.1542.camel@laptop>
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:30 +0100, ext Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Hrm, I think the to bit is not needed with the from thing in place, the
> > enqueue from _setprio will already have added min_vruntime
>
>
> Would lead to something like this:
>
Doesn't work in my case.
> ---
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -8108,6 +8108,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__might_sleep);
> #ifdef CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
> static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> + struct sched_class *prev_class = p->sched_class;
> + int old_prio = p->prio;
> int on_rq;
>
> on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
> @@ -8118,6 +8120,8 @@ static void normalize_task(struct rq *rq
> activate_task(rq, p, 0);
> resched_task(rq->curr);
> }
> +
> + check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, old_prio, task_current(rq, p));
> }
>
> void normalize_rt_tasks(void)
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -4066,11 +4066,30 @@ static void prio_changed_fair(struct rq
> check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0);
> }
>
> +static void
> +switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
> +{
> + struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure the task's vruntime is normalized, so that when its
> + * switched back to the fair class the enqueue_entity(.flags=0) will
> + * do the right thing.
> + *
> + * If it was on_rq, then the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already
> + * have normalized the vruntime, if it was !on_rq, then only when
> + * the task is sleeping will it still have non-normalized vruntime.
> + */
> + if (!se->on_rq && p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
> + se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * We switched to the sched_fair class.
> */
> -static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> - int running)
> +static void
> +switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int running)
> {
> /*
> * We were most likely switched from sched_rt, so
> @@ -4163,6 +4182,7 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sch
> .task_fork = task_fork_fair,
>
> .prio_changed = prio_changed_fair,
> + .switched_from = switched_from_fair,
> .switched_to = switched_to_fair,
>
> .get_rr_interval = get_rr_interval_fair,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-19 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 14:42 Bug in scheduler when using rt_mutex Onkalo Samu
2011-01-17 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-17 15:15 ` samu.p.onkalo
2011-01-17 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-17 16:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18 8:23 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-18 8:59 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-18 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-18 14:25 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19 2:38 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19 3:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 4:35 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19 5:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 6:09 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-19 6:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-19 7:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-19 9:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 12:58 ` Onkalo Samu [this message]
2011-01-19 13:13 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-19 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-20 4:18 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 4:27 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 5:32 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 4:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20 5:30 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 6:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20 7:06 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 8:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-20 9:07 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 10:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-21 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 12:24 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-21 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 15:03 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-21 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 13:15 ` Yong Zhang
2011-01-20 7:07 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-21 6:25 ` Onkalo Samu
2011-01-20 3:10 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295441881.11678.41.camel@kolo \
--to=samu.p.onkalo@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.