From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] perf: panic due to inclied cpu context task_ctx value
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:57:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301324275.4859.25.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110328133033.GA8254@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 15:30 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/26, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 18:35 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > On 03/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 03/26, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > > > index c75925c..e9e4e35 100644
> > > > > --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > > > +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > > > @@ -1073,6 +1073,8 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
> > > > > if (!is_software_event(event))
> > > > > cpuctx->active_oncpu--;
> > > > > ctx->nr_active--;
> > > > > + if (!ctx->nr_active && cpuctx->task_ctx == ctx)
> > > > > + cpuctx->task_ctx = NULL;
> > > >
> > > > If we clear cpuctx->task_ctx, we should also clear ctx->is_active.
> >
> > Right.
>
> Wait... Yes, we have to clear ctx->is_active, otherwise we break, say,
> perf_install_in_context().
>
> But if we clear ->is_active we break perf_event_enable(). Suppose we
> are doing ioctl(PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE) + ioctl(PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE).
> PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE can sched_out the last event, but _IOC_ENABLE
> treats ctx->is_active == F as "it is not running".
Right, same for the tick, if say we can only schedule 1 event at a time
and we close the 1 event that is active, the tick will not rotate a new
event in.
/me goes ponder things..
> Btw, why ctx_sched_out() checks nr_events under perf_pmu_disable() ?
hysterical-raisins or somesuch, how about the below:
---
Subject: perf: Optimize ctx_sched_out
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:55:36 CEST 2011
Oleg noted that ctx_sched_out() disables the PMU even though it might
not actually do something, avoid needless PMU-disabling.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1767,7 +1767,6 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_ev
struct perf_event *event;
raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
- perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu);
ctx->is_active = 0;
if (likely(!ctx->nr_events))
goto out;
@@ -1777,6 +1776,7 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_ev
if (!ctx->nr_active)
goto out;
+ perf_pmu_disable(ctx->pmu);
if (event_type & EVENT_PINNED) {
list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->pinned_groups, group_entry)
group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
@@ -1786,8 +1786,8 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_ev
list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->flexible_groups, group_entry)
group_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
}
-out:
perf_pmu_enable(ctx->pmu);
+out:
raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-28 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 16:44 [PATCH,RFC] perf: panic due to inclied cpu context task_ctx value Jiri Olsa
2011-03-25 19:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-26 16:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 16:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-26 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 17:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-26 18:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 13:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-03-28 15:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 15:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 15:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-28 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 16:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-29 8:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-29 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-29 19:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 13:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-30 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 16:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 18:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-03-30 19:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 21:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 21:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-31 10:32 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-31 12:41 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix task context scheduling tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-31 13:28 ` [PATCH,RFC] perf: panic due to inclied cpu context task_ctx value Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-31 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-31 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-04-04 16:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 15:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 15:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-30 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-30 17:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-26 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1301324275.4859.25.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.