All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Hong Xu <hong.xu@atmel.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MTD/atmel_nand: Fix support for CPUs that do not support DMA access
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:17:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301667458.2789.85.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D95D517.30002@atmel.com>

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 15:37 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 01/04/2011 14:54, Artem Bityutskiy :
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 16:26 +0800, Hong Xu wrote:
> >> use_dma was always "1" even if the CPU does not support DMA
> >>
> >> Tested on AT91SAM9261EK by Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hong Xu <hong.xu@atmel.com>
> > 
> > Pushed to l2-mtd-2.6.git tree. This looks like a candidate for the
> > stable tree - should it be sent there?
> 
> Well, definitively the whole series is a candidate for .39-xx (also with
> the "[PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: Fall back to CPU I/O when buffer is in
> vmalloc(ed) region" that follows.

Thanks for pointing this, I could miss that patch.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dedekind1@gmail.com (Artem Bityutskiy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] MTD/atmel_nand: Fix support for CPUs that do not support DMA access
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:17:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301667458.2789.85.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D95D517.30002@atmel.com>

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 15:37 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 01/04/2011 14:54, Artem Bityutskiy :
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 16:26 +0800, Hong Xu wrote:
> >> use_dma was always "1" even if the CPU does not support DMA
> >>
> >> Tested on AT91SAM9261EK by Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hong Xu <hong.xu@atmel.com>
> > 
> > Pushed to l2-mtd-2.6.git tree. This looks like a candidate for the
> > stable tree - should it be sent there?
> 
> Well, definitively the whole series is a candidate for .39-xx (also with
> the "[PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: Fall back to CPU I/O when buffer is in
> vmalloc(ed) region" that follows.

Thanks for pointing this, I could miss that patch.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (????? ????????)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-01 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-30  8:26 [PATCH 1/3] MTD: atmel_nand: modify test case for using DMA operations Hong Xu
2011-03-30  8:26 ` Hong Xu
2011-03-30  8:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] MTD: atmel_nand: trivial: change DMA usage information trace Hong Xu
2011-03-30  8:26   ` Hong Xu
2011-04-01 12:51   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 12:51     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-03-30  8:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] MTD/atmel_nand: Fix support for CPUs that do not support DMA access Hong Xu
2011-03-30  8:26   ` Hong Xu
2011-04-01 12:54   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 12:54     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 13:37     ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-04-01 13:37       ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-04-01 13:37       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 13:37         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 14:17       ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-04-01 14:17         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] MTD: atmel_nand: modify test case for using DMA operations Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 12:49   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 14:40   ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Nicolas Ferre
2011-04-01 14:40     ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-04-01 14:40     ` Nicolas Ferre
2011-04-01 13:36     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 13:36       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-01 13:36       ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1301667458.2789.85.camel@localhost \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=hong.xu@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.