* I have a problem with signal mask
@ 2007-10-03 12:16 Giana
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Giana @ 2007-10-03 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
I have done Streams multiplexers in Linux kernel. Created two multiplexers
and I could open these 2, close the file descriptors of each and could
link/unlink one with another properly .
But after linking, if i close the descriptor of the linked one: my signals
are unblocked automatically....
Scenario:
1. Created 2 Multiplexers. Link B under A.
2. Now I set SIG_BLOCK to my current running process.
3. Close file descriptor of B
4. Now the signals are received by the process, It automatically goes for
UN_BLOCK
5. But I want the SIG_BLOCK state should be continued in this case....
Only in this scenario, it happens. All other scenarios like (Unlink without
close fd / close fd with out link) works fine....
Please give me some suggestion on this....
Thanks & Regards,
Giana
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/I-have-a-problem-with-signal-mask-tf4561448.html#a13017702
Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-10-03 12:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-03 12:16 I have a problem with signal mask Giana
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.