All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
	SystemTap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 5/26]  5: uprobes: Adding and remove a uprobe in a rb tree.
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:20:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303129228.32491.777.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110401143328.15455.19094.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6>

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:03 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> +static int match_inode(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct inode *inode,
> +                                               struct rb_node **p)
> +{
> +       struct rb_node *n = *p;
> +
> +       if (inode < uprobe->inode)
> +               *p = n->rb_left;
> +       else if (inode > uprobe->inode)
> +               *p = n->rb_right;
> +       else
> +               return 1;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int match_offset(struct uprobe *uprobe, loff_t offset,
> +                                               struct rb_node **p)
> +{
> +       struct rb_node *n = *p;
> +
> +       if (offset < uprobe->offset)
> +               *p = n->rb_left;
> +       else if (offset > uprobe->offset)
> +               *p = n->rb_right;
> +       else
> +               return 1;
> +       return 0;
> +}
>+
> +/* Called with treelock held */
> +static struct uprobe *__find_uprobe(struct inode * inode,
> +                        loff_t offset, struct rb_node **near_match)
> +{
> +       struct rb_node *n = uprobes_tree.rb_node;
> +       struct uprobe *uprobe, *u = NULL;
> +
> +       while (n) {
> +               uprobe = rb_entry(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
> +               if (match_inode(uprobe, inode, &n)) {
> +                       if (near_match)
> +                               *near_match = n;
> +                       if (match_offset(uprobe, offset, &n)) {
> +                               /* get access ref */
> +                               atomic_inc(&uprobe->ref);
> +                               u = uprobe;
> +                               break;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +       }
> +       return u;
> +}

Here you break out the match functions for some reason.

> +/*
> + * Find a uprobe corresponding to a given inode:offset
> + * Acquires treelock
> + */
> +static struct uprobe *find_uprobe(struct inode * inode, loff_t offset)
> +{
> +       struct uprobe *uprobe;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&treelock, flags);
> +       uprobe = __find_uprobe(inode, offset, NULL);
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&treelock, flags);
> +       return uprobe;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Acquires treelock.
> + * Matching uprobe already exists in rbtree;
> + *     increment (access refcount) and return the matching uprobe.
> + *
> + * No matching uprobe; insert the uprobe in rb_tree;
> + *     get a double refcount (access + creation) and return NULL.
> + */
> +static struct uprobe *insert_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
> +{
> +       struct rb_node **p = &uprobes_tree.rb_node;
> +       struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
> +       struct uprobe *u;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&treelock, flags);
> +       while (*p) {
> +               parent = *p;
> +               u = rb_entry(parent, struct uprobe, rb_node);
> +               if (u->inode > uprobe->inode)
> +                       p = &(*p)->rb_left;
> +               else if (u->inode < uprobe->inode)
> +                       p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> +               else {
> +                       if (u->offset > uprobe->offset)
> +                               p = &(*p)->rb_left;
> +                       else if (u->offset < uprobe->offset)
> +                               p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> +                       else {
> +                               /* get access ref */
> +                               atomic_inc(&u->ref);
> +                               goto unlock_return;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +       }
> +       u = NULL;
> +       rb_link_node(&uprobe->rb_node, parent, p);
> +       rb_insert_color(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
> +       /* get access + drop ref */
> +       atomic_set(&uprobe->ref, 2);
> +
> +unlock_return:
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&treelock, flags);
> +       return u;
> +} 

And here you open-code the match functions..

Why not have something like:

static int match_probe(struct uprobe *l, struct uprobe *r)
{
	if (l->inode < r->inode)
		return -1;
	else if (l->inode > r->inode)
		return 1;
	else {
		if (l->offset < r->offset)
			return -1;
		else if (l->offset > r->offset)
			return 1;
	}

	return 0;
}

And use that as:

static struct uprobe *
__find_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
{
	struct uprobe r = { .inode = inode, .offset = offset };
	struct rb_node *n = uprobes_tree.rb_node;
	struct uprobe *uprobe;
	int match;

	while (n) {
		uprobe = rb_node(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
		match = match_probe(uprobe, &r);
		if (!match) {
			atomic_inc(&uprobe->ref);
			return uprobe;
		}
		if (match < 0)
			n = n->rb_left;
		else
			n = n->rb_right;
	}

	return NULL;
}

static struct uprobe *__insert_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
{
	struct rb_node **p = &uprobes_tree.rb_node;
	struct rn_node *parent = NULL;
	struct uprobe *u;
	int match;

	while (*p) {
		parent = *p;
		u = rb_entry(parent, struct uprobe, rb_node);
		match = match_uprobe(u, uprobe);
		if (!match) {
			atomic_inc(&u->ref);
			return u;
		}
		if (match < 0)
			p = &parent->rb_left;
		else
			p = &parent->rb_right;
	}

	atomic_set(&uprobe->ref, 2);
	rb_link_node(&uprobe->rb_node, parent, p);
	rb_insert_color(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
	return uprobe;
}

Isn't that much nicer?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
	SystemTap <systemtap@sources.redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 5/26]  5: uprobes: Adding and remove a uprobe in a rb tree.
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:20:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303129228.32491.777.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110401143328.15455.19094.sendpatchset@localhost6.localdomain6>

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:03 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> +static int match_inode(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct inode *inode,
> +                                               struct rb_node **p)
> +{
> +       struct rb_node *n = *p;
> +
> +       if (inode < uprobe->inode)
> +               *p = n->rb_left;
> +       else if (inode > uprobe->inode)
> +               *p = n->rb_right;
> +       else
> +               return 1;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int match_offset(struct uprobe *uprobe, loff_t offset,
> +                                               struct rb_node **p)
> +{
> +       struct rb_node *n = *p;
> +
> +       if (offset < uprobe->offset)
> +               *p = n->rb_left;
> +       else if (offset > uprobe->offset)
> +               *p = n->rb_right;
> +       else
> +               return 1;
> +       return 0;
> +}
>+
> +/* Called with treelock held */
> +static struct uprobe *__find_uprobe(struct inode * inode,
> +                        loff_t offset, struct rb_node **near_match)
> +{
> +       struct rb_node *n = uprobes_tree.rb_node;
> +       struct uprobe *uprobe, *u = NULL;
> +
> +       while (n) {
> +               uprobe = rb_entry(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
> +               if (match_inode(uprobe, inode, &n)) {
> +                       if (near_match)
> +                               *near_match = n;
> +                       if (match_offset(uprobe, offset, &n)) {
> +                               /* get access ref */
> +                               atomic_inc(&uprobe->ref);
> +                               u = uprobe;
> +                               break;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +       }
> +       return u;
> +}

Here you break out the match functions for some reason.

> +/*
> + * Find a uprobe corresponding to a given inode:offset
> + * Acquires treelock
> + */
> +static struct uprobe *find_uprobe(struct inode * inode, loff_t offset)
> +{
> +       struct uprobe *uprobe;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&treelock, flags);
> +       uprobe = __find_uprobe(inode, offset, NULL);
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&treelock, flags);
> +       return uprobe;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Acquires treelock.
> + * Matching uprobe already exists in rbtree;
> + *     increment (access refcount) and return the matching uprobe.
> + *
> + * No matching uprobe; insert the uprobe in rb_tree;
> + *     get a double refcount (access + creation) and return NULL.
> + */
> +static struct uprobe *insert_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
> +{
> +       struct rb_node **p = &uprobes_tree.rb_node;
> +       struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
> +       struct uprobe *u;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&treelock, flags);
> +       while (*p) {
> +               parent = *p;
> +               u = rb_entry(parent, struct uprobe, rb_node);
> +               if (u->inode > uprobe->inode)
> +                       p = &(*p)->rb_left;
> +               else if (u->inode < uprobe->inode)
> +                       p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> +               else {
> +                       if (u->offset > uprobe->offset)
> +                               p = &(*p)->rb_left;
> +                       else if (u->offset < uprobe->offset)
> +                               p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> +                       else {
> +                               /* get access ref */
> +                               atomic_inc(&u->ref);
> +                               goto unlock_return;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +       }
> +       u = NULL;
> +       rb_link_node(&uprobe->rb_node, parent, p);
> +       rb_insert_color(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
> +       /* get access + drop ref */
> +       atomic_set(&uprobe->ref, 2);
> +
> +unlock_return:
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&treelock, flags);
> +       return u;
> +} 

And here you open-code the match functions..

Why not have something like:

static int match_probe(struct uprobe *l, struct uprobe *r)
{
	if (l->inode < r->inode)
		return -1;
	else if (l->inode > r->inode)
		return 1;
	else {
		if (l->offset < r->offset)
			return -1;
		else if (l->offset > r->offset)
			return 1;
	}

	return 0;
}

And use that as:

static struct uprobe *
__find_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset)
{
	struct uprobe r = { .inode = inode, .offset = offset };
	struct rb_node *n = uprobes_tree.rb_node;
	struct uprobe *uprobe;
	int match;

	while (n) {
		uprobe = rb_node(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
		match = match_probe(uprobe, &r);
		if (!match) {
			atomic_inc(&uprobe->ref);
			return uprobe;
		}
		if (match < 0)
			n = n->rb_left;
		else
			n = n->rb_right;
	}

	return NULL;
}

static struct uprobe *__insert_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
{
	struct rb_node **p = &uprobes_tree.rb_node;
	struct rn_node *parent = NULL;
	struct uprobe *u;
	int match;

	while (*p) {
		parent = *p;
		u = rb_entry(parent, struct uprobe, rb_node);
		match = match_uprobe(u, uprobe);
		if (!match) {
			atomic_inc(&u->ref);
			return u;
		}
		if (match < 0)
			p = &parent->rb_left;
		else
			p = &parent->rb_right;
	}

	atomic_set(&uprobe->ref, 2);
	rb_link_node(&uprobe->rb_node, parent, p);
	rb_insert_color(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
	return uprobe;
}

Isn't that much nicer?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-18 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-01 14:32 [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 0/26] 0: Uprobes patchset with perf probe support Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:32 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 1/26] 1: mm: replace_page() loses static attribute Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:32   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:32 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 2/26] 2: mm: Move replace_page() to mm/memory.c Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:32   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 3/26] 3: X86 specific breakpoint definitions Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 4/26] 4: uprobes: Breakground page replacement Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-18 12:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 12:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 5/26] 5: uprobes: Adding and remove a uprobe in a rb tree Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-18 12:20   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-04-18 12:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 6/26] 6: Uprobes: register/unregister probes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-02  0:26   ` Stephen Wilson
2011-04-02  0:26     ` Stephen Wilson
2011-04-02  0:53     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-02  0:53       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-02  1:29       ` Stephen Wilson
2011-04-02  1:29         ` Stephen Wilson
2011-04-18 12:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 12:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 7/26] 7: x86: analyze instruction and determine fixups Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-19 13:29   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-19 13:29     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-21 17:31     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 17:31       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 17:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-21 17:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 14:33 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 8/26] 8: uprobes: store/restore original instruction Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:33   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-18 16:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 9/26] 9: uprobes: mmap and fork hooks Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:34   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-18 16:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19  6:45     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-19  6:45       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 10/26] 10: x86: architecture specific task information Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:34   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 11/26] 11: uprobes: task specific information Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:34   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:34 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 12/26] 12: uprobes: slot allocation for uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:34   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-18 16:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19  6:26     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-19  6:26       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-19  9:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19  9:02         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19  9:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19  9:11         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-20 13:40       ` Eric Paris
2011-04-20 13:40         ` Eric Paris
2011-04-20 14:51         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-04-20 14:51           ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-04-20 15:16           ` Stephen Smalley
2011-04-20 15:16             ` Stephen Smalley
2011-04-21 14:11         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 14:11           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 14:45           ` Eric Paris
2011-04-21 14:45             ` Eric Paris
2011-04-21 16:14             ` Roland McGrath
2011-04-21 16:14               ` Roland McGrath
2011-04-21 16:59             ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 16:59               ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:35 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 13/26] 13: uprobes: get the breakpoint address Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:35   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-18 16:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 14:35 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 14/26] 14: x86: x86 specific probe handling Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:35   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-18 16:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19  5:43     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-19  5:43       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-18 16:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-18 16:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 14:35 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 15/26] 15: uprobes: Handing int3 and singlestep exception Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:35   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-19 13:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19 13:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19 13:12     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-19 13:12       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-21 17:10     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 17:10       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 17:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-21 17:41         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19 13:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19 13:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-21 17:03     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 17:03       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:35 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 16/26] 16: x86: uprobes exception notifier for x86 Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:35   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:35 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 17/26] 17: uprobes: register a notifier for uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:35   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-19 13:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19 13:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 18/26] 18: uprobes: commonly used filters Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:36   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-05  1:26   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-05  1:26     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-19 13:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-19 13:57     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-21 11:09     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 11:09       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 11:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-21 11:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-21 11:49         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-21 11:49           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 19/26] 19: tracing: Extract out common code for kprobes/uprobes traceevents Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:36   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 20/26] 20: tracing: uprobes trace_event interface Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:36   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 21/26] 21: Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:36   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:47   ` [RESEND] [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 21/26] 21: Uprobe tracer documentation " Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:47     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 22/26] 22: perf: rename target_module to target Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:36   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-04 10:06   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-04 10:06     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-06 23:46     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-06 23:46       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 23/26] 23: perf: show possible probes in a given executable file or library Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:37   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-04 10:15   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-04 10:15     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-06 22:50     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-06 22:50       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 24/26] 24: perf: perf interface for uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:37   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 25/26] 25: perf: Documentation for perf uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:37   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:37 ` [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 26/26] 26: uprobes: filter chain Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-01 14:37   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-05  1:27   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-05  1:27     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-06 22:41     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-06 22:41       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2011-04-07  3:19       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-04-07  3:19         ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1303129228.32491.777.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.