From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dccp: handle invalid feature options length
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 14:43:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304693032.1849.2.camel@dan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304688438.29544.16.camel@dan>
> Can you please check again: did you experience this condition, to me it
> seems the patch is based on reading this code.
>
I saw this while reading the code.
> In this case, please consider the condition before the switch statement:
>
> /* Check if this isn't a single byte option */
> if (opt > DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED) {
> if (opt_ptr = opt_end)
> goto out_nonsensical_length;
>
> len = *opt_ptr++;
> if (len < 2)
> goto out_nonsensical_length;
>
> The described range (DCCPO_CHANGE_L = 32 ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R = 35) is after DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED = 31,
> so that the above test applies.
>
> Hence for these option types the len is always at least 1, so that (len - 1) >= 0.
>
You just missed the important part:
if (len < 2)
goto out_nonsensical_length;
/*
* Remove the type and len fields, leaving
* just the value size
*/
len -= 2;
If the len is 2, this check will pass, and the resulting len will be 0,
causing the underflow.
Regards,
Dan
> | --- a/net/dccp/options.c
> | +++ b/net/dccp/options.c
> | @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, struct dccp_request_sock *dreq,
> | case DCCPO_CHANGE_L ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R:
> | if (pkt_type = DCCP_PKT_DATA) /* RFC 4340, 6 */
> | break;
> | + if (len = 0)
> | + goto out_invalid_option;
> | rc = dccp_feat_parse_options(sk, dreq, mandatory, opt,
> | *value, value + 1, len - 1);
> | if (rc)
> |
> |
>
> --
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
To: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dccp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dccp: handle invalid feature options length
Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 10:43:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304693032.1849.2.camel@dan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110506135345.GA3434@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
> Can you please check again: did you experience this condition, to me it
> seems the patch is based on reading this code.
>
I saw this while reading the code.
> In this case, please consider the condition before the switch statement:
>
> /* Check if this isn't a single byte option */
> if (opt > DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED) {
> if (opt_ptr == opt_end)
> goto out_nonsensical_length;
>
> len = *opt_ptr++;
> if (len < 2)
> goto out_nonsensical_length;
>
> The described range (DCCPO_CHANGE_L = 32 ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R = 35) is after DCCPO_MAX_RESERVED = 31,
> so that the above test applies.
>
> Hence for these option types the len is always at least 1, so that (len - 1) >= 0.
>
You just missed the important part:
if (len < 2)
goto out_nonsensical_length;
/*
* Remove the type and len fields, leaving
* just the value size
*/
len -= 2;
If the len is 2, this check will pass, and the resulting len will be 0,
causing the underflow.
Regards,
Dan
> | --- a/net/dccp/options.c
> | +++ b/net/dccp/options.c
> | @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, struct dccp_request_sock *dreq,
> | case DCCPO_CHANGE_L ... DCCPO_CONFIRM_R:
> | if (pkt_type == DCCP_PKT_DATA) /* RFC 4340, 6 */
> | break;
> | + if (len == 0)
> | + goto out_invalid_option;
> | rc = dccp_feat_parse_options(sk, dreq, mandatory, opt,
> | *value, value + 1, len - 1);
> | if (rc)
> |
> |
>
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-06 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-06 13:27 [PATCH] dccp: handle invalid feature options length Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-06 13:27 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-06 13:53 ` Gerrit Renker
2011-05-06 13:53 ` Gerrit Renker
2011-05-06 14:43 ` Dan Rosenberg [this message]
2011-05-06 14:43 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-06 19:57 ` Gerrit Renker
2011-05-06 19:57 ` Gerrit Renker
2011-05-06 20:04 ` David Miller
2011-05-06 20:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304693032.1849.2.camel@dan \
--to=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.