From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
To: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:29:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305120583.3277.14.camel@odin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9185B06E-E2C4-4F35-8605-9654CA3BA966@slimlogic.co.uk>
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 01:43 -0500, Jorge Eduardo Candelaria wrote:
> On May 10, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi Jorge,
> >
> > On Tue, 10 May 2011 12:30:36 -0500 Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> On May 10, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 12:44 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>> Hi Liam,
> >>>>
> >>>> After merging the voltage tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> >>>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> ERROR: "tps65910_gpio_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "tps65910_irq_init" [drivers/mfd/tps65910.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "irq_modify_status" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "irq_set_chip_and_handler_name" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined!
> >>>> ERROR: "handle_edge_irq" [drivers/mfd/tps65910-irq.ko] undefined!
> >>>>
> >>>> I have used the voltage tree from next-20110509 for today.
> >>>
> >>> Jorge, could you send a fix for this today.
> >>
> >> The following patch should solve this:
> >>
> >> From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> >> MFD: Fix TPS65910 build
> >>
> >> Support for tps65910 as a module is not available. The driver can
> >> only be compiled as built-in. OTOH, the regulator driver can still
> >> be built as module without breaking the compilation.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> >
> > Today (even with the above patch included) I got these errors from the
> > x86_64 allmodconfig build:
> >
> > tps65910.c:(.text+0xf4140): undefined reference to `i2c_master_send'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_read':
> > tps65910.c:(.text+0xf41d2): undefined reference to `i2c_transfer'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_init':
> > tps65910.c:(.init.text+0xcb83): undefined reference to `i2c_register_driver'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65910_i2c_exit':
> > tps65910.c:(.exit.text+0x6e0): undefined reference to `i2c_del_driver'
> >
> > I have used the voltage tree from next-20110509 again today.
>
> Following patch should fix the dependency problems. Please review:
>
> From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> [PATCH] MFD: TPS65910: Fix I2C dependency
>
> TPS65910 driver can only be compiled built-in, so the I2C driver
> should be as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> index c78865e..0131d49 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> @@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ config MFD_OMAP_USB_HOST
>
> config MFD_TPS65910
> bool "TPS65910 Power Management chip"
> - depends on I2C && GPIOLIB
> + depends on I2C=y && GPIOLIB
> select MFD_CORE
> help
> if you say yes here you get support for the TPS65910 series of
Now applied.
Liam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-11 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-10 2:44 linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-10 8:38 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-10 17:30 ` Jorge Eduardo Candelaria
2011-05-10 19:57 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-11 2:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-11 6:43 ` Jorge Eduardo Candelaria
2011-05-11 13:29 ` Liam Girdwood [this message]
2011-05-11 8:47 ` [PATCH] mfd: TPS65910 depends on I2C and must be built in Mark Brown
2011-05-11 13:35 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-11 13:36 ` Mark Brown
[not found] <201105271759.p4RHxa2X008919@hera.kernel.org>
2011-05-27 19:58 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree Randy Dunlap
2011-05-27 21:13 ` Liam Girdwood
2011-05-27 21:21 ` Randy Dunlap
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-15 2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-15 9:04 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-12-15 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-14 4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-14 5:10 ` Yong Shen
2010-12-14 15:56 ` Liam Girdwood
2010-12-15 2:03 ` Yong Shen
2010-11-11 0:36 Stephen Rothwell
2010-11-11 11:46 ` Mark Brown
2010-11-11 12:09 ` Liam Girdwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305120583.3277.14.camel@odin \
--to=lrg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=jedu@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.