From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
To: Jeremy Puhlman <jpuhlman@gmail.com>
Cc: Yocto Mailer <yocto@yoctoproject.org>,
"dvhart@linux.intel.com" <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 22:37:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306381066.22553.52.camel@elmorro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDDAA38.8070404@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:17 -0700, Jeremy Puhlman wrote:
> Opps sent from wrong account.
>
> I was working with some layerinfo code, and I noticed that the values of
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf in the meta-intel repo are kind of all over the map:
>
> for each in */conf/layer.conf; do cat $each; done | grep BBFILE_COLLECTIONS
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_crownbay += "crownbay"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_crownbay-noemgd += "crownbay-noemgd"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_fishriver += "fishriver"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_jasperforest += "jasperforest"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_sugarbay += "sugarbay"
>
> For the above layers when I just list out oe-core and one of the above,
> the results from BBFILE_COLLECTIONS ends up
> just being what ever was set above.
>
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "n450"
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "emenlow"
>
> When using these layers, the final BBFILE_COLLECTIONS is the list of all
> the layers as expected.
>
> Was just curious if there was a intentional reason why the
> difference(i.e. is there some code that I am missing that fixes this up)?
No, not intentional - looks like a case of an overzealous overriding
typo that propagated. I'll cook up a patch to make them all just
'BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += xxxx'
Tom
> -- Jeremy Puhlman Montavista Sofware, LLC.
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-26 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-26 1:17 In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf Jeremy Puhlman
2011-05-26 3:37 ` Tom Zanussi [this message]
2011-05-26 3:49 ` Jeremy Puhlman
2011-05-26 7:39 ` Martin Jansa
2011-05-26 9:49 ` Richard Purdie
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-26 0:54 Jeremy Puhlman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306381066.22553.52.camel@elmorro \
--to=tom.zanussi@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jpuhlman@gmail.com \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.