Re: In consistancy in the defition of BBFILE_COLLECTIONS in layer.conf

[Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 09:39 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Using machine override has one small benefit
> 
> when I have meta-nokia layer which has only recipes with
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "nokia900" and I'm building different machine (like
> om-gta02) I get this warning:
> WARNING: No bb files matched BBFILE_PATTERN_nokia-layer '^/OE/shr-core/meta-smartphone/meta-nokia/'
> because all bb files from this layer are ignored because of
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE

I think there is a change on bitbake master which should fix some of the
cases where this warning was appearing (where a layer only
contained .bbappend files).

> if I change it like this
> -BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "nokia-layer"
> +BBFILE_COLLECTIONS_nokia900 += "nokia-layer"
> maybe with more overrides per layer.conf if it supports multiple
> machines, the warning is gone, but seems like sstate checksums are
> different again, because during test I changed only this and another gcc
> rebuild is in runqueue now :/.

Ouch. If you can figure out what changed we can try and fix that. FWIW,
I also merged the signature generation data writing at stamp creation
time (with fixes).

Cheers,

Richard