Re: [PATCH RFC] fs: introduce a default_open for simple f_op->open use

[Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>]

On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 15:04 -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> There are many f_op->open implementations that simply do:
> 
> 	file->private_data = inode->i_private;
> 
> This introduces a new global symbol, default_open, that can be
> used instead of the private implementations.
> 
> This also removes a couple private implementations that share the
> same symbol name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> If this patch looks reasonable, I have some additional patches that
> convert all other similar f_op->open implemenations to use default_open
> tree wide.  The full diffstat looks like this:

Looks good to me, thanks.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)