All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] irq: add irq_domain translation infrastructure
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:24:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309166659.32158.380.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110627090059.GA31287@linutronix.de>

On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 11:00 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Grant Likely | 2011-05-26 00:54:38 [-0600]:
> 
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> >index 39645b6..9891cd4 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> >@@ -371,36 +321,49 @@ static struct of_ioapic_type of_ioapic_type[] =
> > 	},
> > };
> > 
> >-static int ioapic_xlate(struct irq_domain *id, const u32 *intspec, u32 intsize,
> >-			u32 *out_hwirq, u32 *out_type)
> >+static int ioapic_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *domain,
> >+				struct device_node *controller,
> >+				const u32 *intspec, u32 intsize,
> >+				irq_hw_number_t *out_hwirq, u32 *out_type)
> > {
> >-	struct mp_ioapic_gsi *gsi_cfg;
> > 	struct io_apic_irq_attr attr;
> > 	struct of_ioapic_type *it;
> > 	u32 line, idx, type;
> >+	int rc;
> > 
> >-	if (intsize < 2)
> >+	if (controller != domain->of_node)
> > 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Is there a reason not havining the (controller != domain->of_node) check
> in irq_create_of_mapping()?

Not all domains are associated with a single OF node.

Take xics, where there can be quite a few "source controllers" which act
as device-tree interrupt parents but there's a single global domain.
 
Cheers,
Ben.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
	<bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Andres Salomon <dilinger-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] irq: add irq_domain translation infrastructure
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:24:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309166659.32158.380.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110627090059.GA31287-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>

On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 11:00 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Grant Likely | 2011-05-26 00:54:38 [-0600]:
> 
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> >index 39645b6..9891cd4 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
> >@@ -371,36 +321,49 @@ static struct of_ioapic_type of_ioapic_type[] =
> > 	},
> > };
> > 
> >-static int ioapic_xlate(struct irq_domain *id, const u32 *intspec, u32 intsize,
> >-			u32 *out_hwirq, u32 *out_type)
> >+static int ioapic_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *domain,
> >+				struct device_node *controller,
> >+				const u32 *intspec, u32 intsize,
> >+				irq_hw_number_t *out_hwirq, u32 *out_type)
> > {
> >-	struct mp_ioapic_gsi *gsi_cfg;
> > 	struct io_apic_irq_attr attr;
> > 	struct of_ioapic_type *it;
> > 	u32 line, idx, type;
> >+	int rc;
> > 
> >-	if (intsize < 2)
> >+	if (controller != domain->of_node)
> > 		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Is there a reason not havining the (controller != domain->of_node) check
> in irq_create_of_mapping()?

Not all domains are associated with a single OF node.

Take xics, where there can be quite a few "source controllers" which act
as device-tree interrupt parents but there's a single global domain.
 
Cheers,
Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-27  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-26  6:54 [RFC PATCH] irq: add irq_domain translation infrastructure Grant Likely
2011-05-26  6:54 ` Grant Likely
2011-06-27  9:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-06-27  9:00   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-06-27  9:24   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2011-06-27  9:24     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-27  9:57     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-06-27  9:57       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-06-27 10:14       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-27 10:14         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1309166659.32158.380.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=dilinger@queued.net \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.