Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd/nand : don't free the global data fsl_lbc_ctrl_dev->nand in fsl_elbc_chip_remove()

[Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 09:50 +0800, b35362@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Liu Shuo <b35362@freescale.com>
> 
> The global data fsl_lbc_ctrl_dev->nand don't have to be freed in
> fsl_elbc_chip_remove(). The right place to do that is in fsl_elbc_nand_remove()
> if elbc_fcm_ctrl->counter is zero.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shuo <b35362@freescale.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c |    1 -
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> index 0bb254c..a212116 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> @@ -829,7 +829,6 @@ static int fsl_elbc_chip_remove(struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv)
>  
>  	elbc_fcm_ctrl->chips[priv->bank] = NULL;
>  	kfree(priv);
> -	kfree(elbc_fcm_ctrl);
>  	return 0;
>  }

Do we have to assign fsl_lbc_ctrl_dev->nand to NULL in
fsl_elbc_nand_remove() then? I think that assignment can be killed then.

        if (!elbc_fcm_ctrl->counter) {
                fsl_lbc_ctrl_dev->nand = NULL;
                kfree(elbc_fcm_ctrl);
        }

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy