From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/14] inode: remove iprune_sem
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 14:14:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310098486-6453-12-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310098486-6453-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Now that we have per-sb shrinkers with a lifecycle that is a subset
of the superblock lifecycle and can reliably detect a filesystem
being unmounted, there is not longer any race condition for the
iprune_sem to protect against. Hence we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 21 ---------------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index d8a562e..529bb0b 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -68,17 +68,6 @@ __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_sb_list_lock);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_wb_list_lock);
/*
- * iprune_sem provides exclusion between the icache shrinking and the
- * umount path.
- *
- * We don't actually need it to protect anything in the umount path,
- * but only need to cycle through it to make sure any inode that
- * prune_icache_sb took off the LRU list has been fully torn down by the
- * time we are past evict_inodes.
- */
-static DECLARE_RWSEM(iprune_sem);
-
-/*
* Empty aops. Can be used for the cases where the user does not
* define any of the address_space operations.
*/
@@ -535,14 +524,6 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
dispose_list(&dispose);
-
- /*
- * Cycle through iprune_sem to make sure any inode that prune_icache_sb
- * moved off the list before we took the lock has been fully torn
- * down.
- */
- down_write(&iprune_sem);
- up_write(&iprune_sem);
}
/**
@@ -628,7 +609,6 @@ void prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan)
int nr_scanned;
unsigned long reap = 0;
- down_read(&iprune_sem);
spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_lru_lock);
for (nr_scanned = nr_to_scan; nr_scanned >= 0; nr_scanned--) {
struct inode *inode;
@@ -704,7 +684,6 @@ void prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan)
spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_lru_lock);
dispose_list(&freeable);
- up_read(&iprune_sem);
}
static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode);
--
1.7.5.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/14] inode: remove iprune_sem
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 14:14:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310098486-6453-12-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310098486-6453-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Now that we have per-sb shrinkers with a lifecycle that is a subset
of the superblock lifecycle and can reliably detect a filesystem
being unmounted, there is not longer any race condition for the
iprune_sem to protect against. Hence we can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/inode.c | 21 ---------------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index d8a562e..529bb0b 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -68,17 +68,6 @@ __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_sb_list_lock);
__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_wb_list_lock);
/*
- * iprune_sem provides exclusion between the icache shrinking and the
- * umount path.
- *
- * We don't actually need it to protect anything in the umount path,
- * but only need to cycle through it to make sure any inode that
- * prune_icache_sb took off the LRU list has been fully torn down by the
- * time we are past evict_inodes.
- */
-static DECLARE_RWSEM(iprune_sem);
-
-/*
* Empty aops. Can be used for the cases where the user does not
* define any of the address_space operations.
*/
@@ -535,14 +524,6 @@ void evict_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
dispose_list(&dispose);
-
- /*
- * Cycle through iprune_sem to make sure any inode that prune_icache_sb
- * moved off the list before we took the lock has been fully torn
- * down.
- */
- down_write(&iprune_sem);
- up_write(&iprune_sem);
}
/**
@@ -628,7 +609,6 @@ void prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan)
int nr_scanned;
unsigned long reap = 0;
- down_read(&iprune_sem);
spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_lru_lock);
for (nr_scanned = nr_to_scan; nr_scanned >= 0; nr_scanned--) {
struct inode *inode;
@@ -704,7 +684,6 @@ void prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, int nr_to_scan)
spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_lru_lock);
dispose_list(&freeable);
- up_read(&iprune_sem);
}
static void __wait_on_freeing_inode(struct inode *inode);
--
1.7.5.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-08 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-08 4:14 [PATCH 0/14] Per superblock cache reclaim Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 01/14] dcache: fix __d_alloc prototype to use const Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 02/14] vmscan: add shrink_slab tracepoints Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 9:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 9:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-18 1:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-18 1:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 03/14] vmscan: shrinker->nr updates race and go wrong Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 04/14] vmscan: reduce wind up shrinker->nr when shrinker can't do work Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 05/14] vmscan: add customisable shrinker batch size Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 06/14] inode: convert inode_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 07/14] inode: Make unused inode LRU per superblock Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 08/14] inode: move to per-sb LRU locks Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 19:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 19:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-12 0:34 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-12 0:34 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 09/14] superblock: move pin_sb_for_writeback() to fs/super.c Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 10/14] superblock: introduce per-sb cache shrinker infrastructure Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 11/14] inode: remove iprune_sem Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 12/14] superblock: add filesystem shrinker operations Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 13/14] vfs: increase shrinker batch size Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
2011-07-11 10:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 10:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-08 4:14 ` [PATCH 14/14] xfs: make use of new shrinker callout for the inode cache Dave Chinner
2011-07-08 4:14 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310098486-6453-12-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.