From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: conflicts between omap/cleanup branch and omap_dss2 tree
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:19:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311232784.1874.3.camel@deskari> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107191459.44992.arnd@arndb.de>
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 14:59 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Archit Taneja wrote:
> > Tomi is on vacation right now, but he checks his mail once in a while,
> > so we may get a response soon.
> >
> > Tomi's for-next branch is not up to date yet. So it shouldn't be
> > considered for now. The HWMOD patches in Tomi's for-next branch will be
> > pushed by Paul as 3.1-rc fixes.
> >
> > We will make a temporary branch which will contain all the DSS2 patches
> > which Tomi intended to push for this merge window, once he gets a
> > chance, he can quickly update his for-next branch with it.
>
> Ok, just let me know when you upload that branch so I can remove the
> dependency from the arm-soc tree. Right now, I'm pulling the
> omap_dss2/for_next branch into arm-soc/for_next as a dependency
> to resolve the conflict.
I've pushed a new for-next branch to
git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git for-next. However, I
decided to just reset it to -rc4 for now.
The latest DSS code does not work without bunch of HWMOD/omap_device
patches so I'm not sure if there's any point to push the code to
linux-next which, afaik, does not currently have those HWMOD/omap_device
patches (Paul, correct me if I'm wrong).
Tomi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (Tomi Valkeinen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: conflicts between omap/cleanup branch and omap_dss2 tree
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:19:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311232784.1874.3.camel@deskari> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201107191459.44992.arnd@arndb.de>
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 14:59 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 July 2011, Archit Taneja wrote:
> > Tomi is on vacation right now, but he checks his mail once in a while,
> > so we may get a response soon.
> >
> > Tomi's for-next branch is not up to date yet. So it shouldn't be
> > considered for now. The HWMOD patches in Tomi's for-next branch will be
> > pushed by Paul as 3.1-rc fixes.
> >
> > We will make a temporary branch which will contain all the DSS2 patches
> > which Tomi intended to push for this merge window, once he gets a
> > chance, he can quickly update his for-next branch with it.
>
> Ok, just let me know when you upload that branch so I can remove the
> dependency from the arm-soc tree. Right now, I'm pulling the
> omap_dss2/for_next branch into arm-soc/for_next as a dependency
> to resolve the conflict.
I've pushed a new for-next branch to
git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git for-next. However, I
decided to just reset it to -rc4 for now.
The latest DSS code does not work without bunch of HWMOD/omap_device
patches so I'm not sure if there's any point to push the code to
linux-next which, afaik, does not currently have those HWMOD/omap_device
patches (Paul, correct me if I'm wrong).
Tomi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-17 21:39 conflicts between omap/cleanup branch and omap_dss2 tree Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-17 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-18 8:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-07-18 8:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-07-19 12:27 ` Archit Taneja
2011-07-19 12:27 ` Archit Taneja
2011-07-19 12:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-19 12:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-21 7:19 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2011-07-21 7:19 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-07-21 14:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-07-21 14:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311232784.1874.3.camel@deskari \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=archit@ti.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.