All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: flag all buffers as metadata
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:41:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311720097.11557.16.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110726224016.GA10394@infradead.org>

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:40 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:38:55PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:06 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: 
> > > Now that REQ_META bios aren't treated specially in the CFQ I/O schedule
> > > anymore, we can tag all buffers as metadata to make blktrace traces more
> > > meaningful.  Note that we use buffers also to zero out partial blocks
> > > in the preallocation / hole punching code, and while they operate on
> > > data blocks the zeros written certainly aren't data.  I think this case
> > > is borderline metadata enough to not bother special casing it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > 
> > This looks good.  I plan to re-base the xfs master branch
> > after 3.1-rc1 is out, so I'll wait until after that to
> > commit this (and the others in this series).
> 
> I'd prefer to get it out to Linus ASAP after some review.  Just
> committing it to for-linus for now and later rebasing master on top
> should do fine for that.

OK, fine with me.  I'll get that process started this evening.

					-Alex

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-26 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20110726150633.GA17400@infradead.org>
2011-07-26 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: flag all buffers as metadata Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:38   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-26 22:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:41       ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-07-26 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: prevent against ioend livelocks in xfs_file_fsync Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:39   ` Alex Elder
2011-07-26 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: optimize the negative xattr caching Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 22:39   ` Alex Elder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1311720097.11557.16.camel@doink \
    --to=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.