All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: rongqing.li@windriver.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	lsm <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Export the raw sock's security context to proc.
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:51:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1312552267.19283.47.camel@moss-pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312534686-4099-3-git-send-email-rongqing.li@windriver.com>

On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:58 +0800, rongqing.li@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Roy.Li <rongqing.li@windriver.com>
> 
> The element sk_security of struct sock represents the socket
> security context ID, which is inheriting from the process when
> creates this socket on most of the time.
> 
> but when SELinux type_transition rule is applied to socket, or
> application sets /proc/xxx/attr/createsock, the socket security
> context would be different from the creating process. on this
> condition, the "netstat -Z" will return wrong value, since
> "netstat -Z" only returns the process security context as socket
> process security.
> 
> Export the raw sock's security context to proc, so that "netstat -Z"
> could be fixed by reading procfs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li <rongqing.li@windriver.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/raw.c |    9 +++++++--
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/raw.c b/net/ipv4/raw.c
> index 1457acb..645d373 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/raw.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/raw.c
> @@ -972,6 +972,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(raw_seq_stop);
>  
>  static void raw_sock_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, struct sock *sp, int i)
>  {
> +	int sclen;
>  	struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sp);
>  	__be32 dest = inet->inet_daddr,
>  	       src = inet->inet_rcv_saddr;
> @@ -979,12 +980,15 @@ static void raw_sock_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, struct sock *sp, int i)
>  	      srcp  = inet->inet_num;
>  
>  	seq_printf(seq, "%4d: %08X:%04X %08X:%04X"
> -		" %02X %08X:%08X %02X:%08lX %08X %5d %8d %lu %d %pK %d\n",
> +		" %02X %08X:%08X %02X:%08lX %08X %5d %8d %lu %d %pK %d",
>  		i, src, srcp, dest, destp, sp->sk_state,
>  		sk_wmem_alloc_get(sp),
>  		sk_rmem_alloc_get(sp),
>  		0, 0L, 0, sock_i_uid(sp), 0, sock_i_ino(sp),
>  		atomic_read(&sp->sk_refcnt), sp, atomic_read(&sp->sk_drops));
> +
> +	sock_write_secctx(sp, seq, &sclen);

You don't seem to use the return value or the sclen.  If that's
intentional, then why does sclen exist and why isn't the function void?

> +	seq_putc(seq, '\n');
>  }
>  
>  static int raw_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> @@ -992,7 +996,8 @@ static int raw_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>  	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
>  		seq_printf(seq, "  sl  local_address rem_address   st tx_queue "
>  				"rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt   uid  timeout "
> -				"inode ref pointer drops\n");
> +				"inode ref pointer drops %s",
> +				(selinux_is_enabled() ? "  scontext\n" : "\n"));

The rest of your code isn't SELinux-specific and should work for other
security modules, so there is no reason to make this SELinux-specific
either.  The audit system may provide a useful example.  I'd just always
include the field header (otherwise how can we add any further fields
unambiguously?), and make it something more general, like "seclabel".

>  	else
>  		raw_sock_seq_show(seq, v, raw_seq_private(seq)->bucket);
>  	return 0;

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: rongqing.li@windriver.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov,
	lsm <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Export the raw sock's security context to proc.
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:51:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1312552267.19283.47.camel@moss-pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312534686-4099-3-git-send-email-rongqing.li@windriver.com>

On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:58 +0800, rongqing.li@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Roy.Li <rongqing.li@windriver.com>
> 
> The element sk_security of struct sock represents the socket
> security context ID, which is inheriting from the process when
> creates this socket on most of the time.
> 
> but when SELinux type_transition rule is applied to socket, or
> application sets /proc/xxx/attr/createsock, the socket security
> context would be different from the creating process. on this
> condition, the "netstat -Z" will return wrong value, since
> "netstat -Z" only returns the process security context as socket
> process security.
> 
> Export the raw sock's security context to proc, so that "netstat -Z"
> could be fixed by reading procfs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li <rongqing.li@windriver.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/raw.c |    9 +++++++--
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/raw.c b/net/ipv4/raw.c
> index 1457acb..645d373 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/raw.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/raw.c
> @@ -972,6 +972,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(raw_seq_stop);
>  
>  static void raw_sock_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, struct sock *sp, int i)
>  {
> +	int sclen;
>  	struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sp);
>  	__be32 dest = inet->inet_daddr,
>  	       src = inet->inet_rcv_saddr;
> @@ -979,12 +980,15 @@ static void raw_sock_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, struct sock *sp, int i)
>  	      srcp  = inet->inet_num;
>  
>  	seq_printf(seq, "%4d: %08X:%04X %08X:%04X"
> -		" %02X %08X:%08X %02X:%08lX %08X %5d %8d %lu %d %pK %d\n",
> +		" %02X %08X:%08X %02X:%08lX %08X %5d %8d %lu %d %pK %d",
>  		i, src, srcp, dest, destp, sp->sk_state,
>  		sk_wmem_alloc_get(sp),
>  		sk_rmem_alloc_get(sp),
>  		0, 0L, 0, sock_i_uid(sp), 0, sock_i_ino(sp),
>  		atomic_read(&sp->sk_refcnt), sp, atomic_read(&sp->sk_drops));
> +
> +	sock_write_secctx(sp, seq, &sclen);

You don't seem to use the return value or the sclen.  If that's
intentional, then why does sclen exist and why isn't the function void?

> +	seq_putc(seq, '\n');
>  }
>  
>  static int raw_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> @@ -992,7 +996,8 @@ static int raw_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>  	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
>  		seq_printf(seq, "  sl  local_address rem_address   st tx_queue "
>  				"rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt   uid  timeout "
> -				"inode ref pointer drops\n");
> +				"inode ref pointer drops %s",
> +				(selinux_is_enabled() ? "  scontext\n" : "\n"));

The rest of your code isn't SELinux-specific and should work for other
security modules, so there is no reason to make this SELinux-specific
either.  The audit system may provide a useful example.  I'd just always
include the field header (otherwise how can we add any further fields
unambiguously?), and make it something more general, like "seclabel".

>  	else
>  		raw_sock_seq_show(seq, v, raw_seq_private(seq)->bucket);
>  	return 0;

-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-05 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-05  8:58 [PATCH 0/5] Export the sock's security context to proc rongqing.li
2011-08-05  8:58 ` rongqing.li
2011-08-05  8:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] Define the function to write sock's security context to seq_file rongqing.li
2011-08-05  8:58   ` rongqing.li
2011-08-05 13:32   ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-05 13:32     ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-05 13:56   ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-05 13:56     ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-08  9:32     ` Rongqing Li
2011-08-08  9:32       ` Rongqing Li
2011-08-08 13:25       ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-08 13:25         ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-05  8:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] Export the raw sock's security context to proc rongqing.li
2011-08-05  8:58   ` rongqing.li
2011-08-05 13:51   ` Stephen Smalley [this message]
2011-08-05 13:51     ` Stephen Smalley
2011-08-05  8:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] Export the udp " rongqing.li
2011-08-05  8:58   ` rongqing.li
2011-08-05  8:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] Export the unix " rongqing.li
2011-08-05  8:58   ` rongqing.li
2011-08-05  8:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] Export the tcp " rongqing.li
2011-08-05  8:58   ` rongqing.li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1312552267.19283.47.camel@moss-pluto \
    --to=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rongqing.li@windriver.com \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.