All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: david.wagner@free-electrons.com,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-embedded <linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:29:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315283397.19067.37.camel@sauron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315282208.19067.24.camel@sauron>

On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 07:10 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 06:44 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > It's not a dummy bus, in this approach it would be a the bus that gets
> > > used by all ubiblk devices, which is a very common concept by itself.
> > > It's more like the classic understanding of a 'device class' that Greg
> > > wants to see get replaced by bus_types in the kernel.
> > 
> > Yes, this sounds OK. Although UBI already has notifiers, so we could
> > just add 2 more events.
> 
> Hmm, with notifications the error handling becomes a problem - we want
> the ioctls for creating/removing the block device to be synchronous,
> and, should an error occur, we want to return the error code to the
> user-space. So the existing notifications mechanism does not work well.

... but we can change it a little and have error codes handling, this is
just UB implementation issues.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-embedded <linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org>,
	david.wagner@free-electrons.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:29:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315283397.19067.37.camel@sauron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315282208.19067.24.camel@sauron>

On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 07:10 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 06:44 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > It's not a dummy bus, in this approach it would be a the bus that gets
> > > used by all ubiblk devices, which is a very common concept by itself.
> > > It's more like the classic understanding of a 'device class' that Greg
> > > wants to see get replaced by bus_types in the kernel.
> > 
> > Yes, this sounds OK. Although UBI already has notifiers, so we could
> > just add 2 more events.
> 
> Hmm, with notifications the error handling becomes a problem - we want
> the ioctls for creating/removing the block device to be synchronous,
> and, should an error occur, we want to return the error code to the
> user-space. So the existing notifications mechanism does not work well.

... but we can change it a little and have error codes handling, this is
just UB implementation issues.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-06  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 118+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-24 13:34 [RFC] ubiblk: read-only block layer on top of UBI david.wagner
2011-06-24 13:34 ` david.wagner
2011-06-24 13:34 ` [PATCH] UBI: new module ubiblk: " david.wagner
2011-06-24 13:34   ` david.wagner
2011-06-27 19:26   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-27 19:26     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-28 11:35     ` David Wagner
2011-06-28 11:35       ` David Wagner
2011-06-29  6:52       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-29  6:52         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-28 14:50     ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-06-28 14:50       ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-06-28 15:32       ` David Wagner
2011-06-28 15:32         ` David Wagner
2011-06-29  6:25         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-29  6:25           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-24 13:45 ` [Addendum][RFC] ubiblk: read-only " David Wagner
2011-06-27 19:14 ` [RFC] " Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-27 19:14   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-28 15:24 ` [RFC PATCHv2] UBI: new module ubiblk: " david.wagner
2011-06-28 15:24   ` david.wagner
2011-06-28 15:24   ` david.wagner
2011-06-29  6:54   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-29  6:54     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-26 12:27 ` [PATCH] " David Wagner
2011-07-26 12:27   ` David Wagner
2011-07-26 12:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 12:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 12:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 12:58     ` David Wagner
2011-07-26 12:58       ` David Wagner
2011-07-28  6:14   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-28  6:14     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 11:56   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 11:56     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-17 13:17 ` [PATCHv3] " david.wagner
2011-08-17 13:17   ` david.wagner
2011-08-17 14:20   ` [PATCH] Tools for controling ubiblk David Wagner
2011-08-17 14:20     ` David Wagner
2011-08-22  8:17     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22  8:17       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22  7:39   ` [PATCHv3] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22  7:39     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22  7:42   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22  7:42     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-24 16:23     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-24 16:23       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-25  7:06       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-25  7:06         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-25 15:12         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-25 15:12           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-25 15:12           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-01 12:55           ` David Wagner
2011-09-01 12:55             ` David Wagner
2011-09-01 12:55             ` David Wagner
2011-09-06  3:44           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06  3:44             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06  4:10             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06  4:10               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06  4:10               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06  4:29               ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-09-06  4:29                 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-08 15:26               ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-08 15:26                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-08 15:26                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 11:53                 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 11:53                   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 12:02                   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 12:02                     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 14:25                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 14:25                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 15:27                     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 15:27                       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 14:41                   ` David Wagner
2011-09-09 14:41                     ` David Wagner
2011-09-09 14:41                     ` David Wagner
2011-09-09 14:51                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 14:51                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-11 10:18                     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-11 10:18                       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-11 10:18                       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-11 10:35                       ` David Wagner
2011-09-11 10:35                         ` David Wagner
2011-08-24 16:15 ` [PATCHv4] " david.wagner
2011-08-24 16:15   ` david.wagner
2011-08-24 16:21   ` [PATCH] document ubiblk's usage of the same ioctl magic as a part " David Wagner
2011-08-24 16:21     ` David Wagner
2011-09-06  4:58     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06  4:58       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06  4:55   ` [PATCHv4] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top " Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06  4:55     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-12  9:51 ` [PATCHv5] " David Wagner
2011-09-12  9:51   ` David Wagner
2011-09-12  9:51   ` David Wagner
2011-09-19  4:50   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-19  4:50     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-22  7:58 ` [PATCHv6] " David Wagner
2011-09-22  7:58   ` David Wagner
2011-09-23 10:58   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-23 10:58     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 12:58     ` David Wagner
2011-09-26 12:58       ` David Wagner
2011-09-26  9:17   ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-09-26  9:17     ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-09-26  9:17     ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-09-26 12:11   ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-09-26 12:38 ` [PATCHv7] " David Wagner
2011-09-26 12:38   ` David Wagner
2011-09-26 13:20   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 13:20     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 14:25 ` [PATCHv8] " David Wagner
2011-09-26 14:25   ` David Wagner
2011-09-26 14:36   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 14:36     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 14:40 ` [PATCHv9] " David Wagner
2011-09-26 14:40   ` David Wagner
2011-10-01 14:08   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-10-01 14:08     ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1315283397.19067.37.camel@sauron \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=david.wagner@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.