[PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[tom.zanussi]

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>

oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:

NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux

This patchset restores the build.

Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.

More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]

The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
  Darren Hart (1):
        n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
  http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix

Tom Zanussi (2):
  meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
  meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend

 .../initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend            |    2 -
 .../initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_2.0.bb    |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
 create mode 100644 common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_2.0.bb

[PATCH 1/2] meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install

[tom.zanussi]

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>

x86_64 compatibility was removed from the oe-core
initramfs-live-install because it didn't work well with grub 0.97.
The meta-intel x86-64 machines still need to use
initramfs-live-install so we need an x86_64-compatible recipe.

More fixes for [YOCTO #1428].

Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
---
 .../initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_2.0.bb    |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_2.0.bb

diff --git a/common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_2.0.bb b/common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_2.0.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..da8a64d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_2.0.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "A live image init script"
+LICENSE = "MIT"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://${COREBASE}/meta/COPYING.MIT;md5=3da9cfbcb788c80a0384361b4de20420"
+SRC_URI = "file://init-install.sh"
+
+PR = "r0"
+
+RDEPENDS="grub parted e2fsprogs-mke2fs"
+
+do_install() {
+        install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/init-install.sh ${D}/install.sh
+}
+
+# While this package maybe an allarch due to it being a 
+# simple script, reality is that it is Host specific based
+# on the COMPATIBLE_HOST below, which needs to take precedence
+#inherit allarch
+INHIBIT_DEFAULT_DEPS = "1"
+
+FILES_${PN} = " /install.sh "
+
+# Alternatives to grub need adding for other arch support
+# consistent with grub 1.98 (grub 2)
+COMPATIBLE_HOST = "x86_64.*-linux"
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH 2/2] meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend

[tom.zanussi]

From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>

We can no longer use the 1.0 version of initramfs-live-install, so
remove the corresponding .bbappend.

Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
---
 .../initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend            |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend

diff --git a/common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend b/common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
deleted file mode 100644
index d3420e0..0000000
--- a/common/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bbappend
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-THISDIR := "${@os.path.dirname(bb.data.getVar('FILE', d, True))}"
-FILESPATH =. "${@base_set_filespath(["${THISDIR}/${PN}"], d)}:"
-- 
1.7.0.4

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Richard Purdie]

On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
> 
> oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
> broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:
> 
> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
> ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux
> 
> This patchset restores the build.
> 
> Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.
> 
> More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]
> 
> The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
>   Darren Hart (1):
>         n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%
> 
> are available in the git repository at:
> 
>   git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
>   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix
> 
> Tom Zanussi (2):
>   meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
>   meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend

Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing
these pieces into sync?

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Tom Zanussi]

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
> > 
> > oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
> > broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:
> > 
> > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
> > ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux
> > 
> > This patchset restores the build.
> > 
> > Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.
> > 
> > More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]
> > 
> > The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
> >   Darren Hart (1):
> >         n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
> >   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix
> > 
> > Tom Zanussi (2):
> >   meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
> >   meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend
> 
> Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing
> these pieces into sync?
> 

Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2
cycle...

Tom

> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Richard Purdie]

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
> > > broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:
> > > 
> > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> > > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
> > > ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux
> > > 
> > > This patchset restores the build.
> > > 
> > > Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.
> > > 
> > > More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
> > >   Darren Hart (1):
> > >         n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%
> > > 
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > 
> > >   git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
> > >   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix
> > > 
> > > Tom Zanussi (2):
> > >   meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
> > >   meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend
> > 
> > Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing
> > these pieces into sync?
> > 
> 
> Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2
> cycle...

If someone can confirm that 32 and 64 bit live images work with grub2
and there is no good reason not to do this, I'd be in favour of doing
this now rather than explain why its a mess...

Cheers,

Richard

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Tom Zanussi]

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:45 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote:
> > > > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
> > > > broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:
> > > > 
> > > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> > > > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
> > > > ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux
> > > > 
> > > > This patchset restores the build.
> > > > 
> > > > Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.
> > > > 
> > > > More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]
> > > > 
> > > > The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
> > > >   Darren Hart (1):
> > > >         n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%
> > > > 
> > > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > > 
> > > >   git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
> > > >   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix
> > > > 
> > > > Tom Zanussi (2):
> > > >   meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
> > > >   meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend
> > > 
> > > Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing
> > > these pieces into sync?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2
> > cycle...
> 
> If someone can confirm that 32 and 64 bit live images work with grub2
> and there is no good reason not to do this, I'd be in favour of doing
> this now rather than explain why its a mess...
> 

I haven't tried the 32-bit BSPs with grub2 - been focused on other
things until this incomplete fix for 1428 seems to have forced the
issue, but can try it over the weekend and see what happens.

grub2 isn't a simple version bump from the legacy grub 0.97, but is a
completely incompatible re-write - I thought being more cautious in
removing the grub 0.97 that's worked fine for everything but the couple
of 64-bit meta-intel BSPs that need it would be something for 1.2, but
if it can go in now, why not...

Tom

> Cheers,
> 
> Richard
> 

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Mark Hatle]

On 9/9/11 2:13 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:45 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
>>>>> broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
>>>>> ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
>>>>> ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset restores the build.
>>>>>
>>>>> Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.
>>>>>
>>>>> More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]
>>>>>
>>>>> The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
>>>>>   Darren Hart (1):
>>>>>         n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%
>>>>>
>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>
>>>>>   git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
>>>>>   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom Zanussi (2):
>>>>>   meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
>>>>>   meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend
>>>>
>>>> Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing
>>>> these pieces into sync?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2
>>> cycle...
>>
>> If someone can confirm that 32 and 64 bit live images work with grub2
>> and there is no good reason not to do this, I'd be in favour of doing
>> this now rather than explain why its a mess...
>>
> 
> I haven't tried the 32-bit BSPs with grub2 - been focused on other
> things until this incomplete fix for 1428 seems to have forced the
> issue, but can try it over the weekend and see what happens.
> 
> grub2 isn't a simple version bump from the legacy grub 0.97, but is a
> completely incompatible re-write - I thought being more cautious in
> removing the grub 0.97 that's worked fine for everything but the couple
> of 64-bit meta-intel BSPs that need it would be something for 1.2, but
> if it can go in now, why not...

We need to keep the older grub 0.97 as well.  grub2 is GPLv3 and a lot of people
will refuse to use it based on that.

--Mark

> Tom
> 
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Tom Zanussi]

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:01 -0700, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 9/9/11 2:13 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:45 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote:
> >>>>> From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
> >>>>> broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> >>>>> ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
> >>>>> ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patchset restores the build.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
> >>>>>   Darren Hart (1):
> >>>>>         n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%
> >>>>>
> >>>>> are available in the git repository at:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
> >>>>>   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tom Zanussi (2):
> >>>>>   meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
> >>>>>   meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend
> >>>>
> >>>> Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing
> >>>> these pieces into sync?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2
> >>> cycle...
> >>
> >> If someone can confirm that 32 and 64 bit live images work with grub2
> >> and there is no good reason not to do this, I'd be in favour of doing
> >> this now rather than explain why its a mess...
> >>
> > 
> > I haven't tried the 32-bit BSPs with grub2 - been focused on other
> > things until this incomplete fix for 1428 seems to have forced the
> > issue, but can try it over the weekend and see what happens.
> > 
> > grub2 isn't a simple version bump from the legacy grub 0.97, but is a
> > completely incompatible re-write - I thought being more cautious in
> > removing the grub 0.97 that's worked fine for everything but the couple
> > of 64-bit meta-intel BSPs that need it would be something for 1.2, but
> > if it can go in now, why not...
> 
> We need to keep the older grub 0.97 as well.  grub2 is GPLv3 and a lot of people
> will refuse to use it based on that.
> 

Yeah, thanks for pointing that out.  Will keep the legacy version around
in any case...

Thanks,

Tom


> --Mark
> 
> > Tom
> > 
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Richard
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > yocto mailing list
> > yocto@yoctoproject.org
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Tom Zanussi]

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:24 -0700, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:01 -0700, Mark Hatle wrote:
> > On 9/9/11 2:13 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:45 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > >>>> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanussi@intel.com wrote:
> > >>>>> From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@intel.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428
> > >>>>> broke meta-intel x86_64 builds:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> > >>>>> ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
> > >>>>> ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host x86_64-poky-linux
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This patchset restores the build.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> More fixes for [YOCTO #1428]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The following changes since commit b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9:
> > >>>>>   Darren Hart (1):
> > >>>>>         n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0%
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> are available in the git repository at:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>   git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix
> > >>>>>   http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Tom Zanussi (2):
> > >>>>>   meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install
> > >>>>>   meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing
> > >>>> these pieces into sync?
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2
> > >>> cycle...
> > >>
> > >> If someone can confirm that 32 and 64 bit live images work with grub2
> > >> and there is no good reason not to do this, I'd be in favour of doing
> > >> this now rather than explain why its a mess...
> > >>
> > > 
> > > I haven't tried the 32-bit BSPs with grub2 - been focused on other
> > > things until this incomplete fix for 1428 seems to have forced the
> > > issue, but can try it over the weekend and see what happens.
> > > 
> > > grub2 isn't a simple version bump from the legacy grub 0.97, but is a
> > > completely incompatible re-write - I thought being more cautious in
> > > removing the grub 0.97 that's worked fine for everything but the couple
> > > of 64-bit meta-intel BSPs that need it would be something for 1.2, but
> > > if it can go in now, why not...
> > 
> > We need to keep the older grub 0.97 as well.  grub2 is GPLv3 and a lot of people
> > will refuse to use it based on that.
> > 
> 
> Yeah, thanks for pointing that out.  Will keep the legacy version around
> in any case...
> 

And I just pushed a fix to update the recipe as well...

Tom

> Thanks,
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> > --Mark
> > 
> > > Tom
> > > 
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Richard
> > >>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > yocto mailing list
> > > yocto@yoctoproject.org
> > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > yocto mailing list
> > yocto@yoctoproject.org
> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [PATCH 0/2] More fixes for bug 1428

[Darren Hart]

On 09/09/2011 01:01 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:

> We need to keep the older grub 0.97 as well.  grub2 is GPLv3 and a lot of people
> will refuse to use it based on that.

This is a concern, iirc we needed GRUB 2 for x86_64. I was considering
dropping grub entirely and using syslinux in the 1.2 timeframe. I asked
on list if there were any non-x86 grub users and didn't get any responses.

--
Darren

> 
> --Mark
> 
>> Tom
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
> 
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel