All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Boris Ranto <branto@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	Eric@oss.sgi.com, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: xfstests 258: Test xfs fs creation with fs size close to 4 TB
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:54:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316624075.2986.22.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316613160.781.8.camel@dhcp-26-208.brq.redhat.com>

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 15:52 +0200, Boris Ranto wrote:
> mkfs.xfs failed to create xfs filesystems with 4 TB minus few bytes due
> to round up error in mkfs.xfs code.
> 
> This test case is a regression test for the fs creation problem.
> 
> I've tested the test case with mkfs.xfs patch (in the form posted by
> Eric Sandeen) and the test passed (and therefore the patch fixed the
> issue for me).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ranto <branto@redhat.com>

This looks OK, but I'm a little concerned about the
shell's ability to handle > 32-bit values in its
arithmetic expressions (within $((...))).

Using ${fourtb} works for me, but I just don't know
whether it is written somewhere that bash always
supports 64-bit (or even arbitrary) precision values.

Do you know?

Same general concern goes for dd, but I am more inclined
to think it can handle large numbers.

Otherwise this looks good to me (though I haven't yet
tried it out).

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

. . .

> +fourtb=4398046511104
> +for sub in 1 512 1024 1025 2048 4096;
> +do
> +	echo "Trying to make $fourtb - $sub B long xfs fs image"
> +	rm -f "$testfile"
> +	dd if=/dev/zero "of=$testfile" bs=1 count=0 seek=$(($fourtb - $sub))
> >/dev/null 2>&1 || echo "dd failed"
> +	lofile=$(losetup -f)
> +	losetup $lofile "$testfile"
> +	"$MKFS_XFS_PROG" -b size=512 $lofile >/dev/null || echo "mkfs failed!"
> +	losetup -d $lofile
> +done
> +

. . .


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-21 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-21 13:52 xfstests 258: Test xfs fs creation with fs size close to 4 TB Boris Ranto
2011-09-21 16:54 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2011-09-21 19:06   ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-09-22  8:30   ` Boris Ranto
2011-09-22 16:30     ` Alex Elder
2011-09-26 11:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-26 12:18   ` Alex Elder
2011-09-26 15:59   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1316624075.2986.22.camel@doink \
    --to=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=Eric@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=branto@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.