From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, dokter@icg.tugraz.at
Subject: Re: Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 05:19:07 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1320149947.1840.YahooMailClassic@web65918.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EAFD891.8000204@icg.tugraz.at>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1437 bytes --]
Pasi,
Have you asked yourself a question why Fedora and Ubuntu always patch and package
Qemu-kvm-0.15(14)(13)(..).1.tar.gz , but not Qemu-0.15(14)(13)(..).1.tar.gz ?
Just install a couple of src.rpms to take a look - what's inside.
Boris.
--- On Tue, 11/1/11, Mark Dokter <dokter@icg.tugraz.at> wrote:
From: Mark Dokter <dokter@icg.tugraz.at>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2011, 7:31 AM
On 10/31/2011 10:40 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi!
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1110_xenkvm&num=1
>
> Ubuntu 11.10 with Xen 4.1.1 and Linux 3.0.
>
I've read the article and was surprised.
> Xen seems to be doing very poorly on that benchmark.
> If someone has time to repeat that benchmark it would be good..
>
> Comparing the results to those from Stefano from XenSummit 2011 NA there has be something wrong..
> the results at XenSummit were pretty much the opposite compared to those by Phoronix.
>
In that test, the KVM machine uses virtio disk and nic devices, while
the Xen machine uses the qemu emulated devices. Could that be the cause
for the poor performance?
> -- Pasi
Mark
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2155 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-01 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-31 21:40 Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10 Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-11-01 11:31 ` Mark Dokter
2011-11-01 11:57 ` Ian Campbell
2011-11-01 13:26 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-11-01 21:43 ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-01 23:00 ` Ian Campbell
2011-11-01 12:19 ` Boris Derzhavets [this message]
2011-11-01 20:57 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-02 13:08 Boris Derzhavets
2011-11-02 13:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-02 13:34 ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-02 17:07 ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-02 17:30 ` Boris Derzhavets
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1320149947.1840.YahooMailClassic@web65918.mail.ac4.yahoo.com \
--to=bderzhavets@yahoo.com \
--cc=dokter@icg.tugraz.at \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.