All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Dokter <dokter@icg.tugraz.at>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:31:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EAFD891.8000204@icg.tugraz.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111031214036.GG12984@reaktio.net>

On 10/31/2011 10:40 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello,
> 


Hi!

> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_1110_xenkvm&num=1
> 
> Ubuntu 11.10 with Xen 4.1.1 and Linux 3.0.
> 

I've read the article and was surprised.

> Xen seems to be doing very poorly on that benchmark.
> If someone has time to repeat that benchmark it would be good..
> 
> Comparing the results to those from Stefano from XenSummit 2011 NA there has be something wrong..
> the results at XenSummit were pretty much the opposite compared to those by Phoronix.
> 

In that test, the KVM machine uses virtio disk and nic devices, while
the Xen machine uses the qemu emulated devices. Could that be the cause
for the poor performance?

> -- Pasi

Mark

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-01 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-31 21:40 Phoronix Xen vs KVM vs Virtualbox benchmark with Ubuntu 11.10 Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-11-01 11:31 ` Mark Dokter [this message]
2011-11-01 11:57   ` Ian Campbell
2011-11-01 13:26     ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2011-11-01 21:43       ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-01 23:00       ` Ian Campbell
2011-11-01 12:19   ` Boris Derzhavets
2011-11-01 20:57     ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-02 13:08 Boris Derzhavets
2011-11-02 13:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-02 13:34 ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-02 17:07   ` Alex Bligh
2011-11-02 17:30     ` Boris Derzhavets

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EAFD891.8000204@icg.tugraz.at \
    --to=dokter@icg.tugraz.at \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.