* [PATCH 2/2] IPv6 - support for NLM_F_* flags at IPv6 routing requests
@ 2011-11-03 7:16 Matti Vaittinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Matti Vaittinen @ 2011-11-03 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, shemminger; +Cc: netdev
The support for NLM_F_* flags at IPv6 routing requests.
If NLM_F_CREATE flag is not defined for RTM_NEWROUTE request,
warning is printed, but no error is returned. Instead new route is added.
Exception is when NLM_F_REPLACE flag is given without NLM_F_CREATE, and
no matching route is found. In this case it should be safe to assume
that the request issuer is familiar with NLM_F_* flags, and does really
not want route to be created.
Specifying NLM_F_REPLACE flag will now make the kernel to search for
matching route, and replace it with new one. If no route is found and
NLM_F_CREATE is specified as well, then new route is created.
Also, specifying NLM_F_EXCL will yield returning of error if matching route
is found.
Patch is created against linux-3.1-rc4
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <Mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
diff -uNr linux-3.1-rc4.orig/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c linux-3.1-rc4.new/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
--- linux-3.1-rc4.orig/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 2011-11-01 14:01:55.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-3.1-rc4.new/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c 2011-11-03 08:34:51.000000000 +0200
@@ -429,7 +429,8 @@
static struct fib6_node * fib6_add_1(struct fib6_node *root, void *addr,
int addrlen, int plen,
- int offset)
+ int offset, int allow_create,
+ int replace_required)
{
struct fib6_node *fn, *in, *ln;
struct fib6_node *pn = NULL;
@@ -451,8 +452,12 @@
* Prefix match
*/
if (plen < fn->fn_bit ||
- !ipv6_prefix_equal(&key->addr, addr, fn->fn_bit))
+ !ipv6_prefix_equal(&key->addr, addr, fn->fn_bit)) {
+ if (!allow_create)
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ "NLM_F_CREATE should be specified when creating new rt\n");
goto insert_above;
+ }
/*
* Exact match ?
@@ -481,10 +486,26 @@
fn = dir ? fn->right: fn->left;
} while (fn);
+ if (replace_required && !allow_create) {
+ /* We should not create new node because
+ * NLM_F_REPLACE was specified without NLM_F_CREATE
+ * I assume it is safe to require NLM_F_CREATE when
+ * REPLACE flag is used! Later we may want to remove the
+ * check for replace_required, because according
+ * to netlink specification, NLM_F_CREATE
+ * MUST be specified if new route is created.
+ * That would keep IPv6 consistent with IPv4
+ */
+ printk(KERN_WARNING
+ "NLM_F_CREATE should be specified when creating new rt - ignoring request\n");
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+ }
/*
* We walked to the bottom of tree.
* Create new leaf node without children.
*/
+ if (!allow_create)
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "NLM_F_CREATE should be specified when creating new rt\n");
ln = node_alloc();
@@ -618,6 +639,12 @@
{
struct rt6_info *iter = NULL;
struct rt6_info **ins;
+ int replace = (NULL != info &&
+ NULL != info->nlh &&
+ (info->nlh->nlmsg_flags&NLM_F_REPLACE));
+ int add = ((NULL == info || NULL == info->nlh) ||
+ (info->nlh->nlmsg_flags&NLM_F_CREATE));
+ int found = 0;
ins = &fn->leaf;
@@ -630,6 +657,13 @@
/*
* Same priority level
*/
+ if (NULL != info->nlh &&
+ (info->nlh->nlmsg_flags&NLM_F_EXCL))
+ return -EEXIST;
+ if (replace) {
+ found++;
+ break;
+ }
if (iter->rt6i_dev == rt->rt6i_dev &&
iter->rt6i_idev == rt->rt6i_idev &&
@@ -659,17 +693,40 @@
/*
* insert node
*/
+ if (!replace) {
+ if (!add)
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "NLM_F_CREATE should be specified when creating new rt\n");
+
+add:
+ rt->dst.rt6_next = iter;
+ *ins = rt;
+ rt->rt6i_node = fn;
+ atomic_inc(&rt->rt6i_ref);
+ inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, info);
+ info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_rt_entries++;
+
+ if ((fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO) == 0) {
+ info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_route_nodes++;
+ fn->fn_flags |= RTN_RTINFO;
+ }
- rt->dst.rt6_next = iter;
- *ins = rt;
- rt->rt6i_node = fn;
- atomic_inc(&rt->rt6i_ref);
- inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, info);
- info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_rt_entries++;
-
- if ((fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO) == 0) {
- info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_route_nodes++;
- fn->fn_flags |= RTN_RTINFO;
+ } else {
+ if (!found) {
+ if (add)
+ goto add;
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "add rtinfo to node - NLM_F_REPLACE specified, but no existing node found! bailing out\n");
+ return -ENOENT;
+ }
+ *ins = rt;
+ rt->rt6i_node = fn;
+ rt->dst.rt6_next = iter->dst.rt6_next;
+ atomic_inc(&rt->rt6i_ref);
+ inet6_rt_notify(RTM_NEWROUTE, rt, info);
+ rt6_release(iter);
+ if ((fn->fn_flags & RTN_RTINFO) == 0) {
+ info->nl_net->ipv6.rt6_stats->fib_route_nodes++;
+ fn->fn_flags |= RTN_RTINFO;
+ }
}
return 0;
@@ -700,9 +757,25 @@
{
struct fib6_node *fn, *pn = NULL;
int err = -ENOMEM;
+ int allow_create = 1;
+ int replace_required = 0;
+ if (NULL != info && NULL != info->nlh) {
+ if (!(info->nlh->nlmsg_flags&NLM_F_CREATE))
+ allow_create = 0;
+ if ((info->nlh->nlmsg_flags&NLM_F_REPLACE))
+ replace_required = 1;
+ }
+ if (!allow_create && !replace_required)
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "RTM_NEWROUTE with no NLM_F_CREATE or NLM_F_REPLACE\n");
fn = fib6_add_1(root, &rt->rt6i_dst.addr, sizeof(struct in6_addr),
- rt->rt6i_dst.plen, offsetof(struct rt6_info, rt6i_dst));
+ rt->rt6i_dst.plen, offsetof(struct rt6_info, rt6i_dst),
+ allow_create, replace_required);
+
+ if (IS_ERR(fn)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(fn);
+ fn = NULL;
+ }
if (fn == NULL)
goto out;
@@ -740,7 +813,8 @@
sn = fib6_add_1(sfn, &rt->rt6i_src.addr,
sizeof(struct in6_addr), rt->rt6i_src.plen,
- offsetof(struct rt6_info, rt6i_src));
+ offsetof(struct rt6_info, rt6i_src),
+ allow_create, replace_required);
if (sn == NULL) {
/* If it is failed, discard just allocated
@@ -757,8 +831,13 @@
} else {
sn = fib6_add_1(fn->subtree, &rt->rt6i_src.addr,
sizeof(struct in6_addr), rt->rt6i_src.plen,
- offsetof(struct rt6_info, rt6i_src));
+ offsetof(struct rt6_info, rt6i_src),
+ allow_create, replace_required);
+ if (IS_ERR(sn)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(sn);
+ sn = NULL;
+ }
if (sn == NULL)
goto st_failure;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-11-03 7:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-03 7:16 [PATCH 2/2] IPv6 - support for NLM_F_* flags at IPv6 routing requests Matti Vaittinen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.