* [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE
@ 2011-11-16 1:01 Julian Pidancet
2011-11-23 16:39 ` Julian Pidancet
2011-11-24 3:32 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julian Pidancet @ 2011-11-16 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: B29882, Julian Pidancet
This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables binutils to operate on both
32bit and 64bit binaries. It differs from multilib toolchains in
that it does not require to compile a version of the libc for each
architecture variant. However, the code produced for the secondary
architecture will not be linkable against the libc.
v2: - Renamed the feature name from "biarch" to "multiarch". The GCC
installation manual claims that the mips-linux can be made a tri-arch
compiler (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html)
- For x86_64, the compiler is made bi-arch by default, so nothing
has to be done in particular.
- I analyzed the gcc/config.gcc from GCC sources and added in this
patch all the architectures that could be made biarch with the version
of gcc currently used in OE, which are powerpc, and sparc, in addition
to x86. mips and s390 will probably be supported in future versions of
gcc. For x86 and sparc, only the --enable-targets=all option is valid
to make this work (this option doesn't have any other side effects than
making the compiler bi-arch). For powerpc, I used the
--enable-targets=powerpc64 option (although 'all' also works).
Note: - Untested on powerpc and sparc. But I believe it works the same
as with x86.
- gcc in meta-toolchain is also made multiarch.
Signed-off-by: Julian Pidancet <julian.pidancet@gmail.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc | 3 ++-
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 3 ++-
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc | 10 ++++++++++
meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
index 982224f..f07907e 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
@@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-sysroot=${STAGING_DIR_TARGET} \
--disable-werror \
--disable-nls \
--enable-poison-system-directories \
- ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ld-is-gold', '--enable-gold=default', '', d)}"
+ ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ld-is-gold', '--enable-gold=default', '', d)} \
+ ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'multiarch', '--enable-64-bit-bfd', '', d)}"
do_install () {
oe_runmake 'DESTDIR=${D}' install
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
index 58fee85..51e4257 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ B = "${S}/build.${HOST_SYS}.${TARGET_SYS}"
EXTRA_OECONF = "--program-prefix=${TARGET_PREFIX} \
--enable-install-libbfd \
- --enable-shared"
+ --enable-shared \
+ ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'multiarch', '--enable-64-bit-bfd', '', d)}"
EXTRA_OECONF_virtclass-native = "--enable-target=all --enable-64-bit-bfd --enable-install-libbfd"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc
index 69e0213..7ec2f7e 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc
@@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ def get_gcc_mips_plt_setting(bb, d):
return "--with-mips-plt"
return ""
+def get_gcc_multiarch_setting(bb, d):
+ if 'multiarch' in bb.data.getVar('DISTRO_FEATURES',d,1).split() :
+ if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'i586', 'i686' ] :
+ return "--enable-targets=all"
+ if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'powerpc' ] :
+ return "--enable-targets=powerpc64"
+ if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'sparc' ] :
+ return "--enable-targets=all"
+ return ""
+
# We really need HOST_SYS here for some packages and TARGET_SYS for others.
# For now, libgcc is most important so we fix for that - RP.
SHLIBSDIR = "${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}/shlibs"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
index ae23e8e..d014980 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
@@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "${@['--enable-clocale=generic', ''][d.getVar('USE_NLS', 1) != 'n
${EXTRA_OECONF_BASE} \
${EXTRA_OECONF_FPU} \
${EXTRA_OECONF_PATHS} \
- ${@get_gcc_mips_plt_setting(bb, d)}"
+ ${@get_gcc_mips_plt_setting(bb, d)} \
+ ${@get_gcc_multiarch_setting(bb, d)}"
# Build uclibc compilers without cxa_atexit support
EXTRA_OECONF_append_linux = " --enable-__cxa_atexit"
--
Julian Pidancet
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE
2011-11-16 1:01 [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE Julian Pidancet
@ 2011-11-23 16:39 ` Julian Pidancet
2011-11-23 16:47 ` Richard Purdie
2011-11-24 3:32 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julian Pidancet @ 2011-11-23 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: B29882, Julian Pidancet
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Julian Pidancet
<julian.pidancet@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
> both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables binutils to operate on both
> 32bit and 64bit binaries. It differs from multilib toolchains in
> that it does not require to compile a version of the libc for each
> architecture variant. However, the code produced for the secondary
> architecture will not be linkable against the libc.
>
> v2: - Renamed the feature name from "biarch" to "multiarch". The GCC
> installation manual claims that the mips-linux can be made a tri-arch
> compiler (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html)
> - For x86_64, the compiler is made bi-arch by default, so nothing
> has to be done in particular.
> - I analyzed the gcc/config.gcc from GCC sources and added in this
> patch all the architectures that could be made biarch with the version
> of gcc currently used in OE, which are powerpc, and sparc, in addition
> to x86. mips and s390 will probably be supported in future versions of
> gcc. For x86 and sparc, only the --enable-targets=all option is valid
> to make this work (this option doesn't have any other side effects than
> making the compiler bi-arch). For powerpc, I used the
> --enable-targets=powerpc64 option (although 'all' also works).
>
> Note: - Untested on powerpc and sparc. But I believe it works the same
> as with x86.
> - gcc in meta-toolchain is also made multiarch.
>
Anybody got the time to review this ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE
2011-11-23 16:39 ` Julian Pidancet
@ 2011-11-23 16:47 ` Richard Purdie
2011-11-23 17:28 ` Julian Pidancet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-11-23 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Pidancet; +Cc: B29882, openembedded-core
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:39 +0000, Julian Pidancet wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Julian Pidancet
> <julian.pidancet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
> > both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables binutils to operate on both
> > 32bit and 64bit binaries. It differs from multilib toolchains in
> > that it does not require to compile a version of the libc for each
> > architecture variant. However, the code produced for the secondary
> > architecture will not be linkable against the libc.
> >
> > v2: - Renamed the feature name from "biarch" to "multiarch". The GCC
> > installation manual claims that the mips-linux can be made a tri-arch
> > compiler (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html)
> > - For x86_64, the compiler is made bi-arch by default, so nothing
> > has to be done in particular.
> > - I analyzed the gcc/config.gcc from GCC sources and added in this
> > patch all the architectures that could be made biarch with the version
> > of gcc currently used in OE, which are powerpc, and sparc, in addition
> > to x86. mips and s390 will probably be supported in future versions of
> > gcc. For x86 and sparc, only the --enable-targets=all option is valid
> > to make this work (this option doesn't have any other side effects than
> > making the compiler bi-arch). For powerpc, I used the
> > --enable-targets=powerpc64 option (although 'all' also works).
> >
> > Note: - Untested on powerpc and sparc. But I believe it works the same
> > as with x86.
> > - gcc in meta-toolchain is also made multiarch.
> >
>
> Anybody got the time to review this ?
Funnily enough I was just talking with Saul about this. We're going to
try and expose this to some extended testing (which we try and do for
all compiler changes).
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE
2011-11-23 16:47 ` Richard Purdie
@ 2011-11-23 17:28 ` Julian Pidancet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julian Pidancet @ 2011-11-23 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: openembedded-core
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Richard Purdie
<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:39 +0000, Julian Pidancet wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Julian Pidancet
>> <julian.pidancet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
>> > both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables binutils to operate on both
>> > 32bit and 64bit binaries. It differs from multilib toolchains in
>> > that it does not require to compile a version of the libc for each
>> > architecture variant. However, the code produced for the secondary
>> > architecture will not be linkable against the libc.
>> >
>> > v2: - Renamed the feature name from "biarch" to "multiarch". The GCC
>> > installation manual claims that the mips-linux can be made a tri-arch
>> > compiler (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html)
>> > - For x86_64, the compiler is made bi-arch by default, so nothing
>> > has to be done in particular.
>> > - I analyzed the gcc/config.gcc from GCC sources and added in this
>> > patch all the architectures that could be made biarch with the version
>> > of gcc currently used in OE, which are powerpc, and sparc, in addition
>> > to x86. mips and s390 will probably be supported in future versions of
>> > gcc. For x86 and sparc, only the --enable-targets=all option is valid
>> > to make this work (this option doesn't have any other side effects than
>> > making the compiler bi-arch). For powerpc, I used the
>> > --enable-targets=powerpc64 option (although 'all' also works).
>> >
>> > Note: - Untested on powerpc and sparc. But I believe it works the same
>> > as with x86.
>> > - gcc in meta-toolchain is also made multiarch.
>> >
>>
>> Anybody got the time to review this ?
>
> Funnily enough I was just talking with Saul about this. We're going to
> try and expose this to some extended testing (which we try and do for
> all compiler changes).
>
That's good news. In the mean-time, if there is any additional testing
you'd like me to perform, feel free to ask.
--
Julian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE
2011-11-16 1:01 [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE Julian Pidancet
2011-11-23 16:39 ` Julian Pidancet
@ 2011-11-24 3:32 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-24 12:44 ` Julian Pidancet
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-11-24 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: B29882, Julian Pidancet
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Julian Pidancet
<julian.pidancet@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
> both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables binutils to operate on both
> 32bit and 64bit binaries. It differs from multilib toolchains in
> that it does not require to compile a version of the libc for each
> architecture variant. However, the code produced for the secondary
> architecture will not be linkable against the libc.
>
> v2: - Renamed the feature name from "biarch" to "multiarch". The GCC
> installation manual claims that the mips-linux can be made a tri-arch
> compiler (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html)
> - For x86_64, the compiler is made bi-arch by default, so nothing
> has to be done in particular.
> - I analyzed the gcc/config.gcc from GCC sources and added in this
> patch all the architectures that could be made biarch with the version
> of gcc currently used in OE, which are powerpc, and sparc, in addition
> to x86. mips and s390 will probably be supported in future versions of
> gcc. For x86 and sparc, only the --enable-targets=all option is valid
> to make this work (this option doesn't have any other side effects than
> making the compiler bi-arch). For powerpc, I used the
> --enable-targets=powerpc64 option (although 'all' also works).
>
> Note: - Untested on powerpc and sparc. But I believe it works the same
> as with x86.
> - gcc in meta-toolchain is also made multiarch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Pidancet <julian.pidancet@gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc | 3 ++-
> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 3 ++-
> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc | 10 ++++++++++
> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc | 3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
> index 982224f..f07907e 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
> @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-sysroot=${STAGING_DIR_TARGET} \
> --disable-werror \
> --disable-nls \
> --enable-poison-system-directories \
> - ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ld-is-gold', '--enable-gold=default', '', d)}"
> + ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ld-is-gold', '--enable-gold=default', '', d)} \
> + ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'multiarch', '--enable-64-bit-bfd', '', d)}"
>
> do_install () {
> oe_runmake 'DESTDIR=${D}' install
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> index 58fee85..51e4257 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> @@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ B = "${S}/build.${HOST_SYS}.${TARGET_SYS}"
>
> EXTRA_OECONF = "--program-prefix=${TARGET_PREFIX} \
> --enable-install-libbfd \
> - --enable-shared"
> + --enable-shared \
> + ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'multiarch', '--enable-64-bit-bfd', '', d)}"
>
> EXTRA_OECONF_virtclass-native = "--enable-target=all --enable-64-bit-bfd --enable-install-libbfd"
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc
> index 69e0213..7ec2f7e 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc
> @@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ def get_gcc_mips_plt_setting(bb, d):
> return "--with-mips-plt"
> return ""
>
> +def get_gcc_multiarch_setting(bb, d):
> + if 'multiarch' in bb.data.getVar('DISTRO_FEATURES',d,1).split() :
> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'i586', 'i686' ] :
> + return "--enable-targets=all"
> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'powerpc' ] :
> + return "--enable-targets=powerpc64"
> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'sparc' ] :
> + return "--enable-targets=all"
> + return ""
you forgot mips here
> +
> # We really need HOST_SYS here for some packages and TARGET_SYS for others.
> # For now, libgcc is most important so we fix for that - RP.
> SHLIBSDIR = "${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}/shlibs"
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> index ae23e8e..d014980 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc
> @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "${@['--enable-clocale=generic', ''][d.getVar('USE_NLS', 1) != 'n
> ${EXTRA_OECONF_BASE} \
> ${EXTRA_OECONF_FPU} \
> ${EXTRA_OECONF_PATHS} \
> - ${@get_gcc_mips_plt_setting(bb, d)}"
> + ${@get_gcc_mips_plt_setting(bb, d)} \
> + ${@get_gcc_multiarch_setting(bb, d)}"
>
> # Build uclibc compilers without cxa_atexit support
> EXTRA_OECONF_append_linux = " --enable-__cxa_atexit"
> --
> Julian Pidancet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE
2011-11-24 3:32 ` Khem Raj
@ 2011-11-24 12:44 ` Julian Pidancet
2011-11-24 17:36 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julian Pidancet @ 2011-11-24 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: B29882, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
>> +def get_gcc_multiarch_setting(bb, d):
>> + if 'multiarch' in bb.data.getVar('DISTRO_FEATURES',d,1).split() :
>> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'i586', 'i686' ] :
>> + return "--enable-targets=all"
>> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'powerpc' ] :
>> + return "--enable-targets=powerpc64"
>> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'sparc' ] :
>> + return "--enable-targets=all"
>> + return ""
>
>
> you forgot mips here
>
mips and s390 are not yet supported in the gcc version that OE is using.
--
Julian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE
2011-11-24 12:44 ` Julian Pidancet
@ 2011-11-24 17:36 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-24 17:51 ` Richard Purdie
2011-11-24 22:38 ` Julian Pidancet
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2011-11-24 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Pidancet; +Cc: B29882, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On (24/11/11 12:44), Julian Pidancet wrote:
> >> +def get_gcc_multiarch_setting(bb, d):
> >> + if 'multiarch' in bb.data.getVar('DISTRO_FEATURES',d,1).split() :
> >> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'i586', 'i686' ] :
> >> + return "--enable-targets=all"
> >> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'powerpc' ] :
> >> + return "--enable-targets=powerpc64"
> >> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'sparc' ] :
> >> + return "--enable-targets=all"
> >> + return ""
looking at above function can this be made into a single if statement
instead of 3
and we also need multiarch support in gdb recipes as well.
> >
> >
> > you forgot mips here
> >
>
> mips and s390 are not yet supported in the gcc version that OE is using.
yes right forgot about that it will be in 4.7
>
> --
> Julian
--
-Khem
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE
2011-11-24 17:36 ` Khem Raj
@ 2011-11-24 17:51 ` Richard Purdie
2011-11-24 22:38 ` Julian Pidancet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-11-24 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; +Cc: B29882, Julian Pidancet
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 09:36 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> On (24/11/11 12:44), Julian Pidancet wrote:
> > >> +def get_gcc_multiarch_setting(bb, d):
> > >> + if 'multiarch' in bb.data.getVar('DISTRO_FEATURES',d,1).split() :
> > >> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'i586', 'i686' ] :
> > >> + return "--enable-targets=all"
> > >> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'powerpc' ] :
> > >> + return "--enable-targets=powerpc64"
> > >> + if bb.data.getVar('TARGET_ARCH', d, 1) in [ 'sparc' ] :
> > >> + return "--enable-targets=all"
> > >> + return ""
>
> looking at above function can this be made into a single if statement
> instead of 3
Julian: Could you update this to use the syntax d.getVar instead of
bb.data.getVar(..., d) please? We recently did a fairly big cleanup of
these and I'd rather not see it creep back in! We also prefer "True"
instead of "1" although we've not done a big cleanup on that yet (its
planned).
As Khem mentioned, we can probably get this down to a couple of getVar
calls instead of the above too!
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE
2011-11-24 17:36 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-24 17:51 ` Richard Purdie
@ 2011-11-24 22:38 ` Julian Pidancet
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julian Pidancet @ 2011-11-24 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: B29882, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> and we also need multiarch support in gdb recipes as well.
>
Support for Biarch exists in gdb for x86 since May 2009, and it is
enabled by default as far as I can tell.
I managed to dig up the exact commit in the gdb sources:
http://sourceware.org/git/?p=gdb.git;a=commit;h=5d008094095c4a6f5ccc522abac263d6bc52738b
Regarding powerpc, it seems that gdb can only be made biarch when
configured for a powerpc64 machine.
--
Julian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-24 22:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-16 1:01 [PATCH v2] Introduce multiarch DISTRO_FEATURE Julian Pidancet
2011-11-23 16:39 ` Julian Pidancet
2011-11-23 16:47 ` Richard Purdie
2011-11-23 17:28 ` Julian Pidancet
2011-11-24 3:32 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-24 12:44 ` Julian Pidancet
2011-11-24 17:36 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-24 17:51 ` Richard Purdie
2011-11-24 22:38 ` Julian Pidancet
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.