From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jonas@southpole.se,
lennox.wu@gmail.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/23] memblock: Track total size of regions automatically
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:31:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322508685-32532-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322508685-32532-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Total size of memory regions was calculated by memblock_analyze()
requiring explicitly calling the function between operations which can
change memory regions and possible users of total size, which is
cumbersome and fragile.
This patch makes each memblock_type track total size automatically
with minor modifications to memblock manipulation functions and remove
requirements on calling memblock_analyze(). [__]memblock_dump_all()
now also dumps the total size of reserved regions.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 2 +-
mm/memblock.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 6ac91c5..5bb1500 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -30,12 +30,12 @@ struct memblock_region {
struct memblock_type {
unsigned long cnt; /* number of regions */
unsigned long max; /* size of the allocated array */
+ phys_addr_t total_size; /* size of all regions */
struct memblock_region *regions;
};
struct memblock {
phys_addr_t current_limit;
- phys_addr_t memory_size; /* Updated by memblock_analyze() */
struct memblock_type memory;
struct memblock_type reserved;
};
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index b44875f..f399641 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -179,12 +179,14 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(void)
static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, unsigned long r)
{
+ type->total_size -= type->regions[r].size;
memmove(&type->regions[r], &type->regions[r + 1],
(type->cnt - (r + 1)) * sizeof(type->regions[r]));
type->cnt--;
/* Special case for empty arrays */
if (type->cnt == 0) {
+ WARN_ON(type->total_size != 0);
type->cnt = 1;
type->regions[0].base = 0;
type->regions[0].size = 0;
@@ -314,6 +316,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_insert_region(struct memblock_type *type,
rgn->size = size;
memblock_set_region_node(rgn, nid);
type->cnt++;
+ type->total_size += size;
}
/**
@@ -340,10 +343,11 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_add_region(struct memblock_type *type,
/* special case for empty array */
if (type->regions[0].size == 0) {
- WARN_ON(type->cnt != 1);
+ WARN_ON(type->cnt != 1 || type->total_size);
type->regions[0].base = base;
type->regions[0].size = size;
memblock_set_region_node(&type->regions[0], MAX_NUMNODES);
+ type->total_size = size;
return 0;
}
repeat:
@@ -453,7 +457,8 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
* to process the next region - the new top half.
*/
rgn->base = base;
- rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
+ rgn->size -= base - rbase;
+ type->total_size -= base - rbase;
memblock_insert_region(type, i, rbase, base - rbase,
memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
} else if (rend > end) {
@@ -462,7 +467,8 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_isolate_range(struct memblock_type *type,
* current region - the new bottom half.
*/
rgn->base = end;
- rgn->size = rend - rgn->base;
+ rgn->size -= end - rbase;
+ type->total_size -= end - rbase;
memblock_insert_region(type, i--, rbase, end - rbase,
memblock_get_region_node(rgn));
} else {
@@ -784,10 +790,9 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, i
* Remaining API functions
*/
-/* You must call memblock_analyze() before this. */
phys_addr_t __init memblock_phys_mem_size(void)
{
- return memblock.memory_size;
+ return memblock.memory.total_size;
}
/* lowest address */
@@ -803,7 +808,6 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_end_of_DRAM(void)
return (memblock.memory.regions[idx].base + memblock.memory.regions[idx].size);
}
-/* You must call memblock_analyze() after this. */
void __init memblock_enforce_memory_limit(phys_addr_t limit)
{
unsigned long i;
@@ -906,7 +910,9 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_dump(struct memblock_type *type, char *name
void __init_memblock __memblock_dump_all(void)
{
pr_info("MEMBLOCK configuration:\n");
- pr_info(" memory size = 0x%llx\n", (unsigned long long)memblock.memory_size);
+ pr_info(" memory size = %#llx reserved size = %#llx\n",
+ (unsigned long long)memblock.memory.total_size,
+ (unsigned long long)memblock.reserved.total_size);
memblock_dump(&memblock.memory, "memory");
memblock_dump(&memblock.reserved, "reserved");
@@ -914,13 +920,6 @@ void __init_memblock __memblock_dump_all(void)
void __init memblock_analyze(void)
{
- int i;
-
- memblock.memory_size = 0;
-
- for (i = 0; i < memblock.memory.cnt; i++)
- memblock.memory_size += memblock.memory.regions[i].size;
-
/* We allow resizing from there */
memblock_can_resize = 1;
}
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-28 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 19:31 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 01/23] memblock: Fix include breakages caused by 24aa07882b Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 02/23] memblock: Make memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return int and update prototypes Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 03/23] memblock: Use memblock_reserve() in memblock internal functions Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 04/23] memblock: Add __memblock_dump_all() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 05/23] memblock: Kill sentinel entries at the end of static region arrays Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 07/23] memblock: Separate out memblock_isolate_range() from memblock_set_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 08/23] memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 09/23] memblock: Make memblock functions handle overflowing range @size Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 10/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock_enforce_memory_limit() using __memblock_remove() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 11/23] powerpc: Cleanup memblock usage Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 13/23] memblock: s/memblock_analyze()/memblock_allow_resize()/ and update users Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 14/23] memblock: Implement memblock_add_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 15/23] powerpc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 16/23] sparc: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 17/23] SuperH: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 18/23] ia64: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 19/23] mips: " Tejun Heo
2011-12-08 16:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 20/23] s390: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 21/23] score: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 22/23] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 23/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 17:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 20:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-26 15:35 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 12/23] memblock: Track total size of regions automatically Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322508685-32532-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.