From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, ralf@linux-mips.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jonas@southpole.se,
lennox.wu@gmail.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init()
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:31:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322508685-32532-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322508685-32532-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
memblock_init() initializes arrays for regions and memblock itself;
however, all these can be done with struct initializers and
memblock_init() can be removed. This patch kills memblock_init() and
initializes memblock with struct initializer.
The only difference is that the first dummy entries don't have .nid
set to MAX_NUMNODES initially. This doesn't cause any behavior
difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
arch/arm/mm/init.c | 1 -
arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c | 1 -
arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 2 -
arch/sh/mm/init.c | 1 -
arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 2 -
arch/unicore32/mm/init.c | 1 -
arch/x86/kernel/head32.c | 2 -
arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 2 -
arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 -
include/linux/memblock.h | 1 -
mm/memblock.c | 48 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
12 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/init.c b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
index 9863f03..4140843 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/init.c
@@ -333,7 +333,6 @@ void __init arm_memblock_init(struct meminfo *mi, struct machine_desc *mdesc)
sort(&meminfo.bank, meminfo.nr_banks, sizeof(meminfo.bank[0]), meminfo_cmp, NULL);
- memblock_init();
for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_banks; i++)
memblock_add(mi->bank[i].start, mi->bank[i].size);
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
index 977484a..4d65e97 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_chosen, cmd_line);
/* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
- memblock_init();
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_root, NULL);
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory, NULL);
diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c
index 1bb58ba..7dbc6e0 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_chosen, cmd_line);
/* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
- memblock_init();
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_root, NULL);
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory, NULL);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
index fa1235b..a7ee83e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -733,8 +733,6 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_chosen_ppc, cmd_line);
/* Scan memory nodes and rebuild MEMBLOCKs */
- memblock_init();
-
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_root, NULL);
of_scan_flat_dt(early_init_dt_scan_memory_ppc, NULL);
diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
index 939ca0f..2528962 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
@@ -324,7 +324,6 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
unsigned long vaddr, end;
int nid;
- memblock_init();
sh_mv.mv_mem_init();
early_reserve_mem();
diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
index 8584a25..f42cc87 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c
@@ -1769,8 +1769,6 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
sun4v_ktsb_init();
}
- memblock_init();
-
/* Find available physical memory...
*
* Read it twice in order to work around a bug in openfirmware.
diff --git a/arch/unicore32/mm/init.c b/arch/unicore32/mm/init.c
index 5fb09e2..01e235b 100644
--- a/arch/unicore32/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/unicore32/mm/init.c
@@ -246,7 +246,6 @@ void __init uc32_memblock_init(struct meminfo *mi)
sort(&meminfo.bank, meminfo.nr_banks, sizeof(meminfo.bank[0]),
meminfo_cmp, NULL);
- memblock_init();
for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_banks; i++)
memblock_add(mi->bank[i].start, mi->bank[i].size);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c
index be9282b..51ff186 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head32.c
@@ -31,8 +31,6 @@ static void __init i386_default_early_setup(void)
void __init i386_start_kernel(void)
{
- memblock_init();
-
memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(&_text),
__pa_symbol(&__bss_stop) - __pa_symbol(&_text));
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
index fd25b11..3a3b779 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
@@ -98,8 +98,6 @@ void __init x86_64_start_reservations(char *real_mode_data)
{
copy_bootdata(__va(real_mode_data));
- memblock_init();
-
memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(&_text),
__pa_symbol(&__bss_stop) - __pa_symbol(&_text));
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index 1f92865..12eb07b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -1215,8 +1215,6 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
local_irq_disable();
early_boot_irqs_disabled = true;
- memblock_init();
-
xen_raw_console_write("mapping kernel into physical memory\n");
pgd = xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd, xen_start_info->nr_pages);
xen_ident_map_ISA();
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index 1a3bee7..6ac91c5 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ phys_addr_t memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
int memblock_free_reserved_regions(void);
int memblock_reserve_reserved_regions(void);
-void memblock_init(void);
void memblock_analyze(void);
int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index e808df8..5bbb87f 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -20,12 +20,23 @@
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
-struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock;
+static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
+static struct memblock_region memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
+
+struct memblock memblock __initdata_memblock = {
+ .memory.regions = memblock_memory_init_regions,
+ .memory.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
+ .memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS,
+
+ .reserved.regions = memblock_reserved_init_regions,
+ .reserved.cnt = 1, /* empty dummy entry */
+ .reserved.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS,
+
+ .current_limit = MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE,
+};
int memblock_debug __initdata_memblock;
int memblock_can_resize __initdata_memblock;
-static struct memblock_region memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
-static struct memblock_region memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS] __initdata_memblock;
/* inline so we don't get a warning when pr_debug is compiled out */
static inline const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
@@ -920,37 +931,6 @@ void __init memblock_analyze(void)
memblock_can_resize = 1;
}
-void __init memblock_init(void)
-{
- static int init_done __initdata = 0;
-
- if (init_done)
- return;
- init_done = 1;
-
- /* Hookup the initial arrays */
- memblock.memory.regions = memblock_memory_init_regions;
- memblock.memory.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS;
- memblock.reserved.regions = memblock_reserved_init_regions;
- memblock.reserved.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS;
-
- /* Create a dummy zero size MEMBLOCK which will get coalesced away later.
- * This simplifies the memblock_add() code below...
- */
- memblock.memory.regions[0].base = 0;
- memblock.memory.regions[0].size = 0;
- memblock_set_region_node(&memblock.memory.regions[0], MAX_NUMNODES);
- memblock.memory.cnt = 1;
-
- /* Ditto. */
- memblock.reserved.regions[0].base = 0;
- memblock.reserved.regions[0].size = 0;
- memblock_set_region_node(&memblock.reserved.regions[0], MAX_NUMNODES);
- memblock.reserved.cnt = 1;
-
- memblock.current_limit = MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE;
-}
-
static int __init early_memblock(char *p)
{
if (p && strstr(p, "debug"))
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-28 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-28 19:31 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 01/23] memblock: Fix include breakages caused by 24aa07882b Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 02/23] memblock: Make memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return int and update prototypes Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 03/23] memblock: Use memblock_reserve() in memblock internal functions Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 04/23] memblock: Add __memblock_dump_all() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 05/23] memblock: Kill sentinel entries at the end of static region arrays Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 07/23] memblock: Separate out memblock_isolate_range() from memblock_set_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 08/23] memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 09/23] memblock: Make memblock functions handle overflowing range @size Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 10/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock_enforce_memory_limit() using __memblock_remove() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 11/23] powerpc: Cleanup memblock usage Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 12/23] memblock: Track total size of regions automatically Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 13/23] memblock: s/memblock_analyze()/memblock_allow_resize()/ and update users Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 14/23] memblock: Implement memblock_add_node() Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 15/23] powerpc: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 16/23] sparc: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 17/23] SuperH: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 18/23] ia64: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 19/23] mips: " Tejun Heo
2011-12-08 16:19 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 20/23] s390: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 21/23] score: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 22/23] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-11-28 19:31 ` [PATCH 23/23] memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 16:31 ` [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[], take 2 Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-05 17:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-12-05 20:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-26 15:35 [PATCHSET tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Kill early_node_map[] Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` [PATCH 06/23] memblock: Kill memblock_init() Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 15:35 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322508685-32532-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=lennox.wu@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.