* [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe
@ 2011-12-15 13:08 Otavio Salvador
2011-12-15 13:11 ` Phil Blundell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2011-12-15 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core
There was a 'dropbear-systemd' binary package on meta-oe versioned as
'v1' and it has been merged on dropbear's bbappend; to fix the upgrade
path for the dropbear-systemd package on meta-oe we need to bump epoch
and to avoid messing it up this needs to go into OE-Core.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
---
meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc b/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc
index 1894715..073ac13 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/dropbear/dropbear.inc
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ DEPENDS = "zlib"
RPROVIDES = "ssh sshd"
DEPENDS += "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'pam', 'libpam', '', d)}"
+PE = "1"
+
SRC_URI = "http://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/releases/dropbear-${PV}.tar.gz \
file://urandom-xauth-changes-to-options.h.patch \
file://dropbear-0.53.1-static_build_fix.patch \
--
1.7.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe
2011-12-15 13:08 [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe Otavio Salvador
@ 2011-12-15 13:11 ` Phil Blundell
2011-12-15 13:14 ` Otavio Salvador
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Phil Blundell @ 2011-12-15 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:08 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> There was a 'dropbear-systemd' binary package on meta-oe versioned as
> 'v1' and it has been merged on dropbear's bbappend; to fix the upgrade
> path for the dropbear-systemd package on meta-oe we need to bump epoch
> and to avoid messing it up this needs to go into OE-Core.
If it's just a single output binary at issue then setting PKGE for that
one package would be less disruptive. I must admit I don't fully
understand why this needs to be in oe-core at all though: what exactly
is the "messing up" that would happen otherwise?
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe
2011-12-15 13:11 ` Phil Blundell
@ 2011-12-15 13:14 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-12-15 13:45 ` Otavio Salvador
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2011-12-15 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 993 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:11, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:08 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > There was a 'dropbear-systemd' binary package on meta-oe versioned as
> > 'v1' and it has been merged on dropbear's bbappend; to fix the upgrade
> > path for the dropbear-systemd package on meta-oe we need to bump epoch
> > and to avoid messing it up this needs to go into OE-Core.
>
> If it's just a single output binary at issue then setting PKGE for that
> one package would be less disruptive. I must admit I don't fully
> understand why this needs to be in oe-core at all though: what exactly
> is the "messing up" that would happen otherwise?
>
I didn't know about PKGE; this works for this case :-D
Richard, please ignore this patch!
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1551 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe
2011-12-15 13:14 ` Otavio Salvador
@ 2011-12-15 13:45 ` Otavio Salvador
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2011-12-15 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 790 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:14, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:11, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> If it's just a single output binary at issue then setting PKGE for that
>> one package would be less disruptive. I must admit I don't fully
>> understand why this needs to be in oe-core at all though: what exactly
>> is the "messing up" that would happen otherwise?
>>
>
> I didn't know about PKGE; this works for this case :-D
>
It seems setting:
PKGE_${PN}-systemd = "1" in the bbappend doesn't work.
Any clue?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1581 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-15 13:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-15 13:08 [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe Otavio Salvador
2011-12-15 13:11 ` Phil Blundell
2011-12-15 13:14 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-12-15 13:45 ` Otavio Salvador
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.