From: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com>
To: <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/07] ONKEY: OnKey module for DA9052/53 PMIC v1
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 13:32:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1328515337.30549.22.camel@dhruva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C3AE124F08223B42BC95AEB82F0F6CED1FDDA5AA@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com>
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 19:33 +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > That doesn't seem to address the concern. You're setting ret in
> > > exactly one place and scheduling the work in exactly one place,
> why
> >> are these two things split?
>
> > schedule_delayed_work() is conditional because it should get invoke
> > when onkey button is pressed and not when released. For this reason
> > onkey event is first queried and work is scheduled only when event
> is
> > present. Now when work is scheduled, onkey event gets queried and
> in
> > absence of the onkey event work will not get schedule again. By this
> > logic I'm able to simulated the release of the onkey button.
>
> You're once more completely missing my point. You've got a
> conditional which detects if the button is pressed in which you set a
> flag which is checked later to see if you should also schedule the
> work. Since the only thing that ever sets that flag is the button
> being pressed having the flag seems pointless, you may as well just
> schedule the work instead of setting the flag.
Do you meant to have something like below
if(..) {
} else {
ret = ret & DA9052_EVENTB_ENONKEY;
input_report_key(.., ret);
...
schedule_delayed_work(..);
}
/*
if(ret)
schedule_delayed_work(..);
*/
but this turns out to be a for ever loop.
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <C3AE124F08223B42BC95AEB82F0F6CED1FDDA5AA@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com>
2012-02-06 8:02 ` Ashish Jangam [this message]
2012-02-06 11:19 ` [PATCH 07/07] ONKEY: OnKey module for DA9052/53 PMIC v1 Mark Brown
[not found] <C3AE124F08223B42BC95AEB82F0F6CED1FDDA575@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com>
2012-02-03 13:24 ` Ashish Jangam
2012-02-03 13:52 ` Mark Brown
[not found] <C3AE124F08223B42BC95AEB82F0F6CED1FDDA3ED@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com>
2012-02-01 8:28 ` Ashish Jangam
2012-02-01 9:50 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-17 13:29 Ashish Jangam
2012-01-17 19:55 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1328515337.30549.22.camel@dhruva \
--to=ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.