From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: Avoid unnecessary work in reweight_entity
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:29:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329402561.2293.225.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3D0F41.1010205@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 22:14 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> In original code, using account_entity_dequeue and account_entity_enqueue
> as a pair will do some work unnecessary, such like remove node from list
> and add it back again immediately.
>
> And because there are no really enqueue and dequeue happen here, it is not
> suitable to use account_entity_dequeue and account_entity_enqueue here.
>
> This patch combine the work of them in order to save time.
And yet no numbers on how much it saves :-(
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 7c6414f..fda63ec 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -777,16 +777,28 @@ update_stats_curr_start(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> */
>
> #if defined CONFIG_SMP && defined CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> -static void
> +static inline void
> add_cfs_task_weight(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long weight)
> {
> cfs_rq->task_weight += weight;
> }
> +
> +static inline void
> +sub_add_cfs_task_weight(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long sub, unsigned long add)
> +{
> + cfs_rq->task_weight -= sub;
> + cfs_rq->task_weight += add;
> +}
This is pointless, just use: add_cfs_task_weight(cfs_rq, add - sub);
> #else
> static inline void
> add_cfs_task_weight(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long weight)
> {
> }
> +
> +static inline void
> +sub_add_cfs_task_weight(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long sub, unsigned long add)
> +{
> +}
> #endif
>
> static void
> @@ -938,6 +950,7 @@ static inline void update_entity_shares_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> {
> }
> # endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +
> static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
> unsigned long weight)
> {
> @@ -945,13 +958,15 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
> /* commit outstanding execution time */
> if (cfs_rq->curr == se)
> update_curr(cfs_rq);
> - account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
> + update_load_sub_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight, weight);
> + if (!parent_entity(se)) {
> + update_load_sub_add(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->load, se->load.weight, weight);
same here:
update_load_add(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->load, weight - se->load.weight);
Also superfluous use of curly-braces here.
> + }
> + if (entity_is_task(se)) {
> + sub_add_cfs_task_weight(cfs_rq, se->load.weight, weight);
> + }
idem.
> }
> -
> update_load_set(&se->load, weight);
> -
> - if (se->on_rq)
> - account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
> }
>
> static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 98c0c26..ec4430f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -779,6 +779,14 @@ static inline void update_load_sub(struct load_weight *lw, unsigned long dec)
> lw->inv_weight = 0;
> }
>
> +static inline void update_load_sub_add(struct load_weight *lw, unsigned long dec,
> + unsigned long inc)
> +{
> + lw->weight -= dec;
> + lw->weight += inc;
> + lw->inv_weight = 0;
> +}
again, pointless stuff.
> static inline void update_load_set(struct load_weight *lw, unsigned long w)
> {
> lw->weight = w;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 9:37 [PATCH] sched: Avoid unnecessary work in reweight_entity Michael Wang
2012-02-06 10:31 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-07 2:18 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-07 2:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Wang
2012-02-08 2:10 ` [PATCH v3] sched: " Michael Wang
2012-02-16 14:14 ` [PATCH v4] " Michael Wang
2012-02-16 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-02-17 2:28 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-17 6:03 ` [PATCH v5] " Michael Wang
2012-02-18 1:43 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-20 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-23 10:40 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-24 2:08 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-25 13:56 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-27 4:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-27 5:07 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-27 5:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-27 6:21 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-27 6:44 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-16 14:32 ` [PATCH v4] " Michael Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329402561.2293.225.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.