From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched: Avoid unnecessary work in reweight_entity
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:21:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4B2105.4080306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120227051021.GB28139@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 02/27/2012 01:10 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> * Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2012-02-27 13:07:28]:
>
>>> Is that benchmark run in root (cpu) cgroup? If so, reweight_entity() should not
>>> kick in at all.
>>
>>
>> That's right, if no children group, 'reweight_entity' won't be called, so I have
>> created a cpuset group under root group named 'rg1', and created a memory group
>> under 'rg1' named 'sub', I attached the current shell to the 'sub' cgroup.
>
> 'cpu' and 'cpuset' cgroup resource controllers are separate. By above
> steps, you would still be running kern-bench in root cgroup as far as cpu
> cgroup controller is concerned ..
I think I really need some study on cgroup first...I've done some totally useless
test :( , but still confused that why sys time reduced?
And I got a server with Redhat now, so I will do:
1. cgcreate -g cpu:/subcg1
2. echo $$ > /cgroup/cpu/subcg1/tasks
3. open another shell
4. do 1~3 multi times, plan to get 7 cpu cgroup with 7 shell attached to each one.
5. run kernbench in each shell
Please tell me if I missed some thing :)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> - vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-27 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 9:37 [PATCH] sched: Avoid unnecessary work in reweight_entity Michael Wang
2012-02-06 10:31 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-07 2:18 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-07 2:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Wang
2012-02-08 2:10 ` [PATCH v3] sched: " Michael Wang
2012-02-16 14:14 ` [PATCH v4] " Michael Wang
2012-02-16 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-17 2:28 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-17 6:03 ` [PATCH v5] " Michael Wang
2012-02-18 1:43 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-20 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-23 10:40 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-24 2:08 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-25 13:56 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-27 4:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-27 5:07 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-27 5:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-27 6:21 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2012-02-27 6:44 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-16 14:32 ` [PATCH v4] " Michael Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4B2105.4080306@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.