All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, cfriesen@nortel.com,
	oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
	johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com,
	michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
	tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
	nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it, luca.abeni@unitn.it,
	dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it,
	insop.song@ericsson.com, liming.wang@windriver.com
Subject: [PATCH 12/16] rtmutex: turn the plist into an rb-tree.
Date: Fri,  6 Apr 2012 09:14:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1333696481-3433-13-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1333696481-3433-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com>

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Turn the pi-chains from plist to rb-tree, in the rt_mutex code,
and provide a proper comparison function for -deadline and
-priority tasks.

This is done mainly because:
 - classical prio field of the plist is just an int, which might
   not be enough for representing a deadline;
 - manipulating such a list would become O(nr_deadline_tasks),
   which might be to much, as the number of -deadline task increases.

Therefore, an rb-tree is used, and tasks are queued in it according
to the following logic:
 - among two -priority (i.e., SCHED_BATCH/OTHER/RR/FIFO) tasks, the
   one with the higher (lower, actually!) prio wins;
 - among a -priority and a -deadline task, the latter always wins;
 - among two -deadline tasks, the one with the earliest deadline
   wins.

Queueing and dequeueing functions are changed accordingly, for both
the list of a task's pi-waiters and the list of tasks blocked on
a pi-lock.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/init_task.h |   10 +++
 include/linux/rtmutex.h   |   18 ++----
 include/linux/sched.h     |    4 +-
 kernel/fork.c             |    3 +-
 kernel/rtmutex-debug.c    |   10 +--
 kernel/rtmutex.c          |  151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 kernel/rtmutex_common.h   |   24 ++++---
 kernel/sched.c            |    4 -
 8 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
index cfd9f8d..7a2da88 100644
--- a/include/linux/init_task.h
+++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
 #include <linux/user_namespace.h>
 #include <linux/securebits.h>
+#include <linux/rbtree.h>
 #include <net/net_namespace.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -134,6 +135,14 @@ extern struct cred init_cred;
 
 #define INIT_TASK_COMM "swapper"
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
+# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES						\
+	.pi_waiters = RB_ROOT,						\
+	.pi_waiters_leftmost = NULL,
+#else
+# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES
+#endif
+
 /*
  *  INIT_TASK is used to set up the first task table, touch at
  * your own risk!. Base=0, limit=0x1fffff (=2MB)
@@ -200,6 +209,7 @@ extern struct cred init_cred;
 	INIT_FTRACE_GRAPH						\
 	INIT_TRACE_RECURSION						\
 	INIT_TASK_RCU_PREEMPT(tsk)					\
+	INIT_RT_MUTEXES							\
 }
 
 
diff --git a/include/linux/rtmutex.h b/include/linux/rtmutex.h
index 5ebd0bb..2344d71 100644
--- a/include/linux/rtmutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtmutex.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #define __LINUX_RT_MUTEX_H
 
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
-#include <linux/plist.h>
+#include <linux/rbtree.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock_types_raw.h>
 
 extern int max_lock_depth; /* for sysctl */
@@ -22,12 +22,14 @@ extern int max_lock_depth; /* for sysctl */
  * The rt_mutex structure
  *
  * @wait_lock:	spinlock to protect the structure
- * @wait_list:	pilist head to enqueue waiters in priority order
+ * @waiters:	rbtree root to enqueue waiters in priority order
+ * @waiters_leftmost: top waiter
  * @owner:	the mutex owner
  */
 struct rt_mutex {
 	raw_spinlock_t		wait_lock;
-	struct plist_head	wait_list;
+	struct rb_root          waiters;
+	struct rb_node          *waiters_leftmost;
 	struct task_struct	*owner;
 	int			save_state;
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
@@ -79,7 +81,7 @@ struct hrtimer_sleeper;
 
 #define __RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_PLAIN(mutexname) \
 	.wait_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(mutexname.wait_lock) \
-	, .wait_list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(mutexname.wait_list) \
+	, .waiters = RB_ROOT \
 	, .owner = NULL \
 	__DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname)
 
@@ -120,12 +122,4 @@ extern int rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
 
 extern void rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
-# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES(tsk)						\
-	.pi_waiters	= PLIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.pi_waiters),	\
-	INIT_RT_MUTEX_DEBUG(tsk)
-#else
-# define INIT_RT_MUTEXES(tsk)
-#endif
-
 #endif
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 23cca57..5ef7bb6 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct sched_param {
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/timex.h>
 #include <linux/jiffies.h>
+#include <linux/plist.h>
 #include <linux/rbtree.h>
 #include <linux/thread_info.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
@@ -1551,7 +1552,8 @@ struct task_struct {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
 	/* PI waiters blocked on a rt_mutex held by this task */
-	struct plist_head pi_waiters;
+	struct rb_root pi_waiters;
+	struct rb_node *pi_waiters_leftmost;
 	/* Deadlock detection and priority inheritance handling */
 	struct rt_mutex_waiter *pi_blocked_on;
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index b263c69..344e0b4 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1033,7 +1033,8 @@ static void rt_mutex_init_task(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&p->pi_lock);
 #ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
-	plist_head_init(&p->pi_waiters);
+	p->pi_waiters = RB_ROOT;
+	p->pi_waiters_leftmost = NULL;
 	p->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
 #endif
 }
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex-debug.c b/kernel/rtmutex-debug.c
index 8eafd1b..e80670d 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex-debug.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
 #include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/plist.h>
+#include <linux/rbtree.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
 
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void printk_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int print_owner)
 
 void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
 {
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!plist_head_empty(&task->pi_waiters));
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&task->pi_waiters));
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->pi_blocked_on);
 }
 
@@ -152,16 +152,14 @@ void debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 void debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
 {
 	memset(waiter, 0x11, sizeof(*waiter));
-	plist_node_init(&waiter->list_entry, MAX_PRIO);
-	plist_node_init(&waiter->pi_list_entry, MAX_PRIO);
+	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
+	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry);
 	waiter->deadlock_task_pid = NULL;
 }
 
 void debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
 {
 	put_pid(waiter->deadlock_task_pid);
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!plist_node_empty(&waiter->list_entry));
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!plist_node_empty(&waiter->pi_list_entry));
 	memset(waiter, 0x22, sizeof(*waiter));
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c
index b525158..6234c0e 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -102,16 +102,110 @@ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 }
 #endif
 
+static inline int
+rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
+		     struct rt_mutex_waiter *right)
+{
+	if (left->task->prio < right->task->prio)
+		return 1;
+
+	/*
+	 * If both tasks are dl_task(), we check their deadlines.
+	 */
+	if (dl_prio(left->task->prio) && dl_prio(right->task->prio))
+		return (left->task->dl.deadline < right->task->dl.deadline);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void
+rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+	struct rb_node **link = &lock->waiters.rb_node;
+	struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
+	struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
+	int leftmost = 1;
+
+	while (*link) {
+		parent = *link;
+		entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry);
+		if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) {
+			link = &parent->rb_left;
+		} else {
+			link = &parent->rb_right;
+			leftmost = 0;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (leftmost)
+		lock->waiters_leftmost = &waiter->tree_entry;
+
+	rb_link_node(&waiter->tree_entry, parent, link);
+	rb_insert_color(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
+}
+
+static void
+rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+	if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry))
+		return;
+
+	if (lock->waiters_leftmost == &waiter->tree_entry)
+		lock->waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->tree_entry);
+
+	rb_erase(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
+	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry);
+}
+
+static void
+rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+	struct rb_node **link = &task->pi_waiters.rb_node;
+	struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
+	struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
+	int leftmost = 1;
+
+	while (*link) {
+		parent = *link;
+		entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry);
+		if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) {
+			link = &parent->rb_left;
+		} else {
+			link = &parent->rb_right;
+			leftmost = 0;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (leftmost)
+		task->pi_waiters_leftmost = &waiter->pi_tree_entry;
+
+	rb_link_node(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, parent, link);
+	rb_insert_color(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+}
+
+static void
+rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+	if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry))
+		return;
+
+	if (task->pi_waiters_leftmost == &waiter->pi_tree_entry)
+		task->pi_waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
+
+	rb_erase(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
+}
+
 static inline void init_lists(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
-	if (unlikely(!lock->wait_list.node_list.prev))
-		plist_head_init(&lock->wait_list);
+/*	if (unlikely(!lock->wait_list.node_list.prev))
+		plist_head_init(&lock->wait_list);*/
 }
 
 /*
- * Calculate task priority from the waiter list priority
+ * Calculate task priority from the waiter tree priority
  *
- * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter list is empty or when
+ * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter tree is empty or when
  * the waiter is not allowed to do priority boosting
  */
 int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task)
@@ -119,7 +213,7 @@ int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task)
 	if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task)))
 		return task->normal_prio;
 
-	return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->pi_list_entry.prio,
+	return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio,
 		   task->normal_prio);
 }
 
@@ -245,7 +339,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
 	 * When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further
 	 * priority adjustment is necessary.
 	 */
-	if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->list_entry.prio == task->prio)
+	if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->task->prio == task->prio)
 		goto out_unlock_pi;
 
 	lock = waiter->lock;
@@ -266,9 +360,9 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
 	top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
 
 	/* Requeue the waiter */
-	plist_del(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
-	waiter->list_entry.prio = task->prio;
-	plist_add(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
+	rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
+	waiter->task->prio = task->prio;
+	rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
 
 	/* Release the task */
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
@@ -294,17 +388,15 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
 
 	if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
 		/* Boost the owner */
-		plist_del(&top_waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
-		waiter->pi_list_entry.prio = waiter->list_entry.prio;
-		plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+		rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, top_waiter);
+		rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
 		__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
 
 	} else if (top_waiter == waiter) {
 		/* Deboost the owner */
-		plist_del(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+		rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
 		waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
-		waiter->pi_list_entry.prio = waiter->list_entry.prio;
-		plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+		rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
 		__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
 	}
 
@@ -405,7 +497,7 @@ __try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
 
 		/* remove the queued waiter. */
 		if (waiter) {
-			plist_del(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
+			rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
 			task->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
 		}
 
@@ -415,8 +507,7 @@ __try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
 		 */
 		if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
 			top = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
-			top->pi_list_entry.prio = top->list_entry.prio;
-			plist_add(&top->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
+			rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, top);
 		}
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
 	}
@@ -475,13 +566,11 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 	__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
 	waiter->task = task;
 	waiter->lock = lock;
-	plist_node_init(&waiter->list_entry, task->prio);
-	plist_node_init(&waiter->pi_list_entry, task->prio);
 
 	/* Get the top priority waiter on the lock */
 	if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
 		top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
-	plist_add(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
+	rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
 
 	task->pi_blocked_on = waiter;
 
@@ -492,8 +581,8 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 
 	if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
-		plist_del(&top_waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters);
-		plist_add(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters);
+		rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter);
+		rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter);
 
 		__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
 		if (rt_mutex_real_waiter(owner->pi_blocked_on))
@@ -545,7 +634,7 @@ static void wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 	 * boosted mode and go back to normal after releasing
 	 * lock->wait_lock.
 	 */
-	plist_del(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &current->pi_waiters);
+	rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
 
 	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
 
@@ -569,7 +658,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 	int chain_walk = 0;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&current->pi_lock, flags);
-	plist_del(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list);
+	rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
 	current->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&current->pi_lock, flags);
 
@@ -580,13 +669,13 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
 
-		plist_del(&waiter->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters);
+		rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, waiter);
 
 		if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
 			struct rt_mutex_waiter *next;
 
 			next = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
-			plist_add(&next->pi_list_entry, &owner->pi_waiters);
+			rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, next);
 		}
 		__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
 
@@ -596,8 +685,6 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
 	}
 
-	WARN_ON(!plist_node_empty(&waiter->pi_list_entry));
-
 	if (!chain_walk)
 		return;
 
@@ -625,7 +712,7 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
 
 	waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
 	if (!rt_mutex_real_waiter(waiter) ||
-	    waiter->list_entry.prio == task->prio) {
+	    waiter->task->prio == task->prio) {
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -779,7 +866,6 @@ static void  noinline __sched rt_spin_lock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
 
 	BUG_ON(rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock) && &waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
-	BUG_ON(!plist_node_empty(&waiter.list_entry));
 
 	raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
 
@@ -1286,7 +1372,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_destroy);
 void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name)
 {
 	lock->owner = NULL;
-	plist_head_init(&lock->wait_list);
+	lock->waiters = RB_ROOT;
+	lock->waiters_leftmost = NULL;
 
 	debug_rt_mutex_init(lock, name);
 }
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h
index 6ec3dc1..aa2be42 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -40,13 +40,13 @@ extern void schedule_rt_mutex_test(struct rt_mutex *lock);
  * This is the control structure for tasks blocked on a rt_mutex,
  * which is allocated on the kernel stack on of the blocked task.
  *
- * @list_entry:		pi node to enqueue into the mutex waiters list
- * @pi_list_entry:	pi node to enqueue into the mutex owner waiters list
+ * @tree_entry:		pi node to enqueue into the mutex waiters tree
+ * @pi_tree_entry:	pi node to enqueue into the mutex owner waiters tree
  * @task:		task reference to the blocked task
  */
 struct rt_mutex_waiter {
-	struct plist_node	list_entry;
-	struct plist_node	pi_list_entry;
+	struct rb_node          tree_entry;
+	struct rb_node          pi_tree_entry;
 	struct task_struct	*task;
 	struct rt_mutex		*lock;
 	bool			savestate;
@@ -58,11 +58,11 @@ struct rt_mutex_waiter {
 };
 
 /*
- * Various helpers to access the waiters-plist:
+ * Various helpers to access the waiters-tree:
  */
 static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
-	return !plist_head_empty(&lock->wait_list);
+	return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&lock->waiters);
 }
 
 static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
 	struct rt_mutex_waiter *w;
 
-	w = plist_first_entry(&lock->wait_list, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
-			       list_entry);
+	w = rb_entry(lock->waiters_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
+		     tree_entry);
 	BUG_ON(w->lock != lock);
 
 	return w;
@@ -79,14 +79,14 @@ rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 
 static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	return !plist_head_empty(&p->pi_waiters);
+	return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&p->pi_waiters);
 }
 
 static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
 task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	return plist_first_entry(&p->pi_waiters, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
-				  pi_list_entry);
+	return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
+			pi_tree_entry);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, bool savestate)
 	debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(waiter);
 	waiter->task = NULL;
 	waiter->savestate = savestate;
+	rb_init_node(&waiter->tree_entry);
+	rb_init_node(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
 }
 
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 92d5e26..00e69a0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -8824,10 +8824,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 	open_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ, run_rebalance_domains);
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
-	plist_head_init(&init_task.pi_waiters);
-#endif
-
 	/*
 	 * The boot idle thread does lazy MMU switching as well:
 	 */
-- 
1.7.5.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-06  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-06  7:14 [RFC][PATCH 00/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE v4 Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 01/16] sched: add sched_class->task_dead Juri Lelli
2012-04-08 17:49   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-08 18:09     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 02/16] sched: add extended scheduling interface Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 03/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE data structures Juri Lelli
2012-04-23  9:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23  9:47     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23  9:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23  9:55         ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 10:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23  9:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23  9:28     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23  9:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23  9:36     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23  9:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23  9:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 10:16     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 10:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 10:33         ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 04/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE SMP-related " Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 05/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE policy implementation Juri Lelli
2012-04-11  3:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11  6:54     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 13:41   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11 13:55     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 10:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 10:18     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 10:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 10:37     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 21:25       ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2012-04-23 21:45         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 23:25           ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2012-04-24  6:29             ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-24  6:52               ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 11:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 12:13     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 12:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 13:37         ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 14:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 11:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 11:57     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 11:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 14:43     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 15:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 21:55     ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2012-04-23 21:58       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 23:21         ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2012-04-24  9:50           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24  1:03         ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-23 14:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 14:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 15:34     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 14:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 15:39     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 15:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 16:41         ` Juri Lelli
     [not found]           ` <4F95D41F.5060700@sssup.it>
2012-04-24  7:21             ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-24  9:00               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 10:10         ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23 15:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 15:37     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 06/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE push and pull logic Juri Lelli
2012-04-06 13:39   ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-06 17:31     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-07  2:32       ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-07  7:46         ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-08 20:20         ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-09 12:28           ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-10  8:11             ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 15:57               ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11 16:00           ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11 16:09             ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 14:10     ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-12 12:28       ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-12 12:51         ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-12 12:56           ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-12 13:35             ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-12 13:41               ` Hillf Danton
2012-04-11 16:07   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11 16:11     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 16:14   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-19 13:44     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 16:21   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11 16:24     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 16:33   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-24 13:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 18:50       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-24 18:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 19:01           ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11 17:25   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11 17:48     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 07/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE avg_update accounting Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 08/16] sched: add period support for -deadline tasks Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 20:32   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11 21:56     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 22:13     ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2012-04-12  0:19       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-12  6:39     ` Luca Abeni
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 09/16] sched: add schedstats " Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 10/16] sched: add resource limits " Juri Lelli
2012-04-24 15:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 15:22     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-24 16:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-24 17:14         ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 11/16] sched: add latency tracing " Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 21:03   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-12  7:16     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-16 15:51     ` Daniel Vacek
2012-04-16 19:56       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-16 21:31         ` Daniel Vacek
2012-04-06  7:14 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2012-04-11 21:11   ` [PATCH 12/16] rtmutex: turn the plist into an rb-tree Steven Rostedt
2012-04-22 14:28     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23  8:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 11:37       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 13/16] sched: drafted deadline inheritance logic Juri Lelli
2012-04-12  2:42   ` Steven Rostedt
2012-04-22 14:04     ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-23  8:39     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 14/16] sched: add bandwidth management for sched_dl Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 15/16] sched: speed up -dl pushes with a push-heap Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  7:14 ` [PATCH 16/16] sched: add sched_dl documentation Juri Lelli
2012-04-06  8:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE v4 Luca Abeni
2012-04-07  9:25   ` Tadeus Prastowo
2012-04-06 11:07 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-04-07  7:52 ` Juri Lelli
2012-04-11 14:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/16] sched: " Steven Rostedt
2012-04-11 14:28   ` Juri Lelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1333696481-3433-13-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --to=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hgu1972@gmail.com \
    --cc=insop.song@ericsson.com \
    --cc=johan.eker@ericsson.com \
    --cc=liming.wang@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=p.faure@akatech.ch \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raistlin@linux.it \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.